Shearergol 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Should be in the XI you jest, shirley? who would he start ahead of? Pattison,or le Sib whos been awful last few games Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 19825 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 le sib has done ten times more for us than luque and HAS to start ahead of him. ironic when you consider their respective price tags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 le sib has done ten times more for us than luque and HAS to start ahead of him. ironic when you consider their respective price tags. Regardless of form. Interesting. He's been utter wank for two games now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 19825 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 le sib has done ten times more for us than luque and HAS to start ahead of him. ironic when you consider their respective price tags. Regardless of form. Interesting. He's been utter wank for two games now. i didn't think sibierksi had a bad game against spurs. i have never seen luque have a good game for us. he's certainly never shown any good form, unlike le sib. luque looked a good player for depor; he's never looked a good player for us and has done nothing to show that he deserves to start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pegasus Bridge 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Sibeirski worked his tits off against spurs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Sibeirski worked his tits off against spurs. As did Ramage last night. Still shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pegasus Bridge 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Sibeirski worked his tits off against spurs. As did Ramage last night. Still shit. Sibs would be a better CB than Ramage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Sibeirski worked his tits off against spurs. As did Ramage last night. Still shit. Sibs would be a better CB than Ramage. Wouldn't disagree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 9 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Sibeirski worked his tits off against spurs. As did Ramage last night. Still shit. ...as did Pattison...as did O'Brien. Anyone who'd still have those two ahead of Luque are idiots imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pegasus Bridge 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Sibeirski worked his tits off against spurs. As did Ramage last night. Still shit. ...as did Pattison...as did O'Brien. Anyone who'd still have those two ahead of Luque are idiots imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmericanMag 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Author Share Posted January 18, 2007 Let's not start that argument... One thing that springs to mind is the way that Martins played against Spurs. He did next to nowt for the whole game but when he had the opportunity he was able to put the ball in the net. Some were saying that is what you get with a 10 mil. buyer... Luque may be the same... does nothing much but when he does it counts. Like Palermo. It's just a theory.... not saying its fact or anything... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Sibeirski worked his tits off against spurs. As did Ramage last night. Still shit. ...as did Pattison...as did O'Brien. Anyone who'd still have those two ahead of Luque are idiots imo. Didn't you say Pattison was better than Emre, Rocker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pegasus Bridge 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Sibeirski worked his tits off against spurs. As did Ramage last night. Still shit. ...as did Pattison...as did O'Brien. Anyone who'd still have those two ahead of Luque are idiots imo. Didn't you say Pattison was better than Emre, Rocker? No, I said, last season, If Emre were to leave, Pattison could quite easily fill in the gap in midfield. Given his performances I seen of him at academy and reserve level, I thought that he could handle it. I was wrong, he's looked out of his depth this season. I can hold my hands up, I was wrong about him coming good. I remember Marc Walton being touted as the next Shearer, and by quite a few people Just shows you, doesn't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missed Sticks 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 Given the complete lack of options i'd at least put Luque on the bench and maybe start him on the left. I'd also play whoever plays for the reserves at LB and. Other option would be to put reserve LB at LB (obviously), Edgar at RB, Nobby on the RW and Milner at LW, Dyer up with Femi. Most worrying thought is Drainage and Hunts at CB tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobby 0 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STMHrljQeEY LUQUE video, playing for the reseves. deserves a chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gejon 2 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 If I could be arsed to search youtube I could probably find you a vid or two showing why Kazenga deserves a chance aswell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now