TheMoog 0 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Harry Redknapp says he won't be held to ransom by Liverpool in his pursuit of striker Peter Crouch. (Daily Star) £9m bid rejected. Liverpool are off their heads. Knocking back a £2M profit from a lad who hardly gets a start? Hardly got a start and still managed 11 goals. He`s at least worth 12 mil, if we don`t get it we should hang on to him for a season. Villa won`t get 20 mil for Barry. We`ll get him for 15. Won't he go on a free then if he's only got a year left? Hmm, £9m in the hand now for a player who doesn't start OR keep him for another year as a sub and get nothing for him... that doesn't exactly make sound business sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake 0 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 15m for Barry? Fuck me sideways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 15m for Barry? Fuck me sideways More realistic than 20 though..................... or the 20 plus paid for Hargreaves or Carrick who are both poor players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Harry Redknapp says he won't be held to ransom by Liverpool in his pursuit of striker Peter Crouch. (Daily Star) £9m bid rejected. Liverpool are off their heads. Knocking back a £2M profit from a lad who hardly gets a start? Hardly got a start and still managed 11 goals. He`s at least worth 12 mil, if we don`t get it we should hang on to him for a season. Villa won`t get 20 mil for Barry. We`ll get him for 15. Won't he go on a free then if he's only got a year left? Hmm, £9m in the hand now for a player who doesn't start OR keep him for another year as a sub and get nothing for him... that doesn't exactly make sound business sense. I`d rather keep him as I think he`s a good player. Give him a few more games and a new contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Harry Redknapp says he won't be held to ransom by Liverpool in his pursuit of striker Peter Crouch. (Daily Star) £9m bid rejected. Liverpool are off their heads. Knocking back a £2M profit from a lad who hardly gets a start? Hardly got a start and still managed 11 goals. He`s at least worth 12 mil, if we don`t get it we should hang on to him for a season. Villa won`t get 20 mil for Barry. We`ll get him for 15. Won't he go on a free then if he's only got a year left? Hmm, £9m in the hand now for a player who doesn't start OR keep him for another year as a sub and get nothing for him... that doesn't exactly make sound business sense. I`d rather keep him as I think he`s a good player. Give him a few more games and a new contract. For the love of god keep him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Harry Redknapp says he won't be held to ransom by Liverpool in his pursuit of striker Peter Crouch. (Daily Star) £9m bid rejected. Liverpool are off their heads. Knocking back a £2M profit from a lad who hardly gets a start? Hardly got a start and still managed 11 goals. He`s at least worth 12 mil, if we don`t get it we should hang on to him for a season. Villa won`t get 20 mil for Barry. We`ll get him for 15. Won't he go on a free then if he's only got a year left? Hmm, £9m in the hand now for a player who doesn't start OR keep him for another year as a sub and get nothing for him... that doesn't exactly make sound business sense. I`d rather keep him as I think he`s a good player. Give him a few more games and a new contract. For the love of god keep him. You lot could well do with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4290 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 15m for Barry? Fuck me sideways More realistic than 20 though..................... or the 20 plus paid for Hargreaves or Carrick who are both poor players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26856 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 15m for Barry? Fuck me sideways More realistic than 20 though..................... or the 20 plus paid for Hargreaves or Carrick who are both poor players. What a silly bitter wanker you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 15m for Barry? Fuck me sideways More realistic than 20 though..................... or the 20 plus paid for Hargreaves or Carrick who are both poor players. What a silly bitter wanker you are. I think they`re poor considering what was paid for them. How is that bitter? I assure you though that you are far more bitter than I. You tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc4ever 0 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Michael Carrick was £18.6m. Owen Hargreaves was £17m. '20 plus' indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SloopJohn 0 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Harry Redknapp says he won't be held to ransom by Liverpool in his pursuit of striker Peter Crouch. (Daily Star) £9m bid rejected. Liverpool are off their heads. Knocking back a £2M profit from a lad who hardly gets a start? Hardly got a start and still managed 11 goals. He`s at least worth 12 mil, if we don`t get it we should hang on to him for a season. Villa won`t get 20 mil for Barry. We`ll get him for 15. as I said. Martin O'Neil won't let him go for under 20m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26856 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 15m for Barry? Fuck me sideways More realistic than 20 though..................... or the 20 plus paid for Hargreaves or Carrick who are both poor players. What a silly bitter wanker you are. I think they`re poor considering what was paid for them. How is that bitter? I assure you though that you are far more bitter than I. You tool. You said they were poor players, not because of their transfer fee so stop back tracking. And I would prefer either of them to Mascherano plus they were both less expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay 8 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 15m for Barry? Fuck me sideways More realistic than 20 though..................... or the 20 plus paid for Hargreaves or Carrick who are both poor players. What a silly bitter wanker you are. I think they`re poor considering what was paid for them. How is that bitter? I assure you though that you are far more bitter than I. You tool. You said they were poor players, not because of their transfer fee so stop back tracking. And I would prefer either of them to Mascherano plus they were both less expensive. Thought Mascherano was less than both of them or at least the same price? and is younger and a better player what's not to prefer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Since Carrick went to Man Utd they've turned around a relatively barren spell (when Chelsea dominated) and have won two consecutive league titles and a European Cup so I'd suggest they're more than happy they've gotten value for money there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 5079 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Young with potential. Sounds like our kind of target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26856 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 15m for Barry? Fuck me sideways More realistic than 20 though..................... or the 20 plus paid for Hargreaves or Carrick who are both poor players. What a silly bitter wanker you are. I think they`re poor considering what was paid for them. How is that bitter? I assure you though that you are far more bitter than I. You tool. You said they were poor players, not because of their transfer fee so stop back tracking. And I would prefer either of them to Mascherano plus they were both less expensive. Thought Mascherano was less than both of them or at least the same price? and is younger and a better player what's not to prefer? Mascherano was £18.6m, Hargreaves £17m and Carrick £14m with the possibility of rising to £18.6m depending on appearances and club success so really Mascherano is the most expensive of the lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay 8 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Aye but Masch is still younger and a bit better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Mascherano and Carrick are different sorts of players though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SloopJohn 0 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Mascherano is easily the best defensive midfielder in the world. his range of passing is slightly worse than Carrick's but in every other facet he's better. hell, he's so good that he manages to cover both him and Gerrard's gaps in midfield whilst Stevie cavaliers around the pitch like a brainless bull. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Mascherano is quality but I wouldn't even class Carrick as a defensive midfielder, which was more my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay 8 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Yeah, you would be looking to be playing them both together in a 4-2-3-1 formation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Yeah, you would be looking to be playing them both together in a 4-2-3-1 formation. You could play both of them easily in the middle. In the formation you mention or a more conventional 4-4-2 imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay 8 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Yeah, you would be looking to be playing them both together in a 4-2-3-1 formation. You could play both of them easily in the middle. In the formation you mention or a more conventional 4-4-2 imo. I agree however I would prefer a more attacking player than Carrick in a 4-4-2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 Harry Redknapp says he won't be held to ransom by Liverpool in his pursuit of striker Peter Crouch. (Daily Star) £9m bid rejected. Liverpool are off their heads. Knocking back a £2M profit from a lad who hardly gets a start? Hardly got a start and still managed 11 goals. He`s at least worth 12 mil, if we don`t get it we should hang on to him for a season. Villa won`t get 20 mil for Barry. We`ll get him for 15. as I said. Martin O'Neil won't let him go for under 20m. Villa are down to £18M... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/t...lla/7450271.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SloopJohn 0 Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 Harry Redknapp says he won't be held to ransom by Liverpool in his pursuit of striker Peter Crouch. (Daily Star) £9m bid rejected. Liverpool are off their heads. Knocking back a £2M profit from a lad who hardly gets a start? Hardly got a start and still managed 11 goals. He`s at least worth 12 mil, if we don`t get it we should hang on to him for a season. Villa won`t get 20 mil for Barry. We`ll get him for 15. as I said. Martin O'Neil won't let him go for under 20m. Villa are down to £18M... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/t...lla/7450271.stm bbc are wrong as usual. 20m and he'll go. o'neil is furious with both barry and rafa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now