adios

Now those fuckers know how to kick off.

Google really need to sort out dynamic hotwords for their devices or we'll soon have an army of devices responding to our commands. #dictionarydefinitionoffirstworldproblems

That too.

Aye, Dear Zachary remains one of the most moving things I've ever watched.

Finally scientists have a worthy reason to invent time travel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNOIQ_OUHeU Not the greatest angle for the initial ball in, but nothing looks out of sorts.

Alright Jonjo.

I thought Ashley owned stock in Puma, in the region of 15%, but computer says no. Maybe he held some for a short time?

I was going to get on the "supporting a shitty regime that supports Sharia law and basically imprisons Indian workers" train, but I really couldn't have put it more succinctly than this.

I do think it's naive to think they didn't intend the press to misinterpret that, though I have been wrong before. Can't remember when.

Yep, I think you're right, as I stated above, and I trusted the news sources too quickly with just a brief glance at the source material at the time. Since they're failing the Luhn test, I don't think they're any kind of sensitive numbers at all. I'm probably going to email that Gizmodo journalist at some point to get his take, as he's stuck to his guns after Wikileaks rebuked him. SSNs and PPNs shouldn't be freely bandied about, but I don't think there's any regulation stipulating that. I probably owe yourself and Mr Assange an apology.

Checksum is failing on those numbers, which I obviously didn't check before. Not sure what to make of it.

Example: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/99 (looks like 16 digit cc numbers and bank sort code) I also see SSNs and PPNs leaked, not sure if in that example (but I can link if needed). It's not about the cards being leaked, it's about Assange and Wikileaks (according to you) still maintaining this blatant untruth. It's about integrity, which I'm sure you agree is integral to an organisation with this kind of power/responsibility.

Sorry, missed your second point at the time. This source? That's clearly misinformation based on what's actually in the leaks (assuming I'm not being lied to by multiple credible news sources - if those even exist anymore). Are the media and the DNC culpable in this? Absolutely. The point I'm making is about the integrity of Assange, which calls into question the integrity of Wikileaks itself. I have mixed feelings about the value of these leaks. Taking a long view, there's a decent chance it's positive, but it's very complex and I don't think we really know. Short term it appears to have been a fucking disaster. I think Trump is largely in the White House due to this mess. But feck it, we're moving to the wings in politics and now we just have to pray this lurch to the right all over the West is the dying cry of the angry white man before a move to proper leftist ideals.

Ritchie way more effective on that side too.

Hasn't he mostly gone for fluid attacking football at home? He got it very wrong today like.

Loving the 'unbeaten record disappeared' too. By that logic, all unbeaten runs are bad because they come to an end at some point.

Big win for you today, @@Noelie.

I looked at the leaks, with the full CC numbers on them. Do I need to dig it up? It kind of sounds like you're already conceding the point. Deflecting fault to the DNC doesn't change anything about what he did. No thoughts on the misinformation in their latest tweets as referenced in that NYT article? @@Rayvin, I have mixed feelings about their overall value, regardless of Assange. It just calls their whole operation into question. I think Snowden is a hero fwiw.

Are we mathematically safe from the drop yet?

Huddersfield win.

What's the bidding at?

15 mins. Easy 4-3.

Sounds like Rafa got this completely wrong tbf.