manc-mag

Seriously this is fucked up. And I'm guessing John Smiths fuelled to boot. Christ. Every reply to you starts with "obsessed" now it's like he has an obsession with telling you how obsessed you are Leazes, this is some pretty degrading trolling for an argument, even by your standards. Plus I think you've been at the sauce in all honesty. In all good grace, people are just saying 'abort thread' tbh and no harm done.

Seriously this is fucked up. And I'm guessing John Smiths fuelled to boot. Christ.

obsessed. Reality lost on you though, as usual. No, people don't say what you said above. And if I can make a helpful suggestion, I think you'd be well advised to try and confine your cringeworthy nonsense to the one thread where possible. The last few days has been a catastrophe even by your standards.

Shambolic thread.

The gym clearly leaving Gemmill as weak as a kitten tbh. Can't even press and hold his IPhone buttons after a session.

He lives a couple of roads from me as it happens. True story. I wouldn't have him in the house though.

Putting two and two together though, it would account for why some old bloke was elbowing him and protesting that he'd "been there since 1954" if Henda was sat in his seat, having gone to the wrong corner of the ground.

Thankyer verrmuch.

I heard his tickets were wrongly addressed anyway tbf. They wrote upon it: "Return to Henda"

Upside down ticket? Walking to the north-east corner and not realising which direction he was travelling in and how the stadium is orientated in relation to that. 'You're in Newcastle (not Gateshead) and you've got your back to the river, which direction are you travelling in?' If you dont know the answer to that, you've got ovaries. I don't remember him saying he arrived by boat, like.

Ah well you picked the right end for the respective goals.

Thought you'd mentioned you were in the South West corner, mate? Was hoping to see some old twat elbowing you anyway.

Anyway, 30 pages. Fuck this for a laugh.

You could be 100% "right" in your predictions about Ashley's spending plans, but you'll fail to find anyone who categorically refutes that point anyway. At the same time, being proved "right" in that regard wouldn't vindicate your views about Shepherd or indeed vitiate the (perfectly valid and contextual) points others make about the realities of financing NUFC these days, post-Shepherd. It's a failure to grasp these basic rudiments that render you incapable of participating in sensible debate.

only to tits who think it IS representative of the entire years of the Halls and Shepherd. Like you, when you spouted that bollocks about the club "lacking the total professionalism to actually win something"...I didn't answer that particular nonsense, because it implies that the likes of the smogs, Leicester to name 2 actually WERE more professional than we were for those 15 years, which is clearly bollocks. At the end of the day, however short the club were, only 4 clubs during that entire period were more professional than we were, and managers such as Keegan, Dalglish, Gullit and Robson would clearly know and understand these areas and rectify them during over a decade of managing the football club. I don't get your problem. Why do you think you know more than everybody, you know nothing about me, but you think you know more than me, is it because you have some sort of ego problem ? You were wrong man, just admit it instead of arguing and bickering like a big bairn all the time. If I am wrong about Mike Ashley, if he invests the Carrol money completely into signing players with the intention of coming out of this a better team and spends a period of time in the top 4-6 places and competing at the level the previous owners did, then I will admit I am wrong. No problem, in fact as I am paying for 3 years upfront again, I hope he does. But having witnessed 4 years already of his "plan" it doesn't look too good does it......not all of us were attracted to the club by the Halls and Shepherd and not all of us have bailed out since they sold and then have the hypocrisy to criticise how they ran the club. But he won't show the ambition and use that money completely, his "plan" is to survive in the premiership with minimum expenditure. You have already said this is nonsense. You will see. But at least you can say he has a "plan" although it isn't the sort of "plan" you may like, and others who absurdly expected ambition on the field was an automatic right when you said anybody but the Halls and Shepherd would be better owners. Bookmark this thread. OK, mate. OK. Tbh I think that's more your insecurities coming out because, as you never tire of telling everybody, you "know more about the club than anyone." You can't debate though so it makes no odds at the end of the day. I've asked a simple question which you can't answer and instead you're going through your default routine of countering with made up statements. Fair enough, but everyone can see it for what it is.

And in reference to your edit, aye, I said he didn't have a plan at the end. Or a clue. It had become a shambles. You'll interpret that (somehow) as being a criticism of his entire tenure and ingratitude at playing in Europe etc etc in bygone years.

give it a rest. Mike Ashley will never match the Halls and Shepherd, even with his "plan", and the limit of his ambition is to survive in the premiership with as little expenditure as possible. Only a complete prick can't see that, like you. And whats more, you won't admit you were wrong when this stares you in the face either. Now. Fuck off, and stop derailing threads and stalking me, you are boring and a tosser without the balls to admit you have been proved completely wrong. Bookmark this thread. See my post (above) in response to Skidders. Answer in your own time. One line, a future event and it has to contradict something I'm saying. Thread bookmarked. I've told you already what will happen and you have disagreed. You have bookmarked the thread. Good. Have you searched for your posts when you said Villa's "plan" would do better than the "planless" Halls and shepherd yet ? I don't hold out much hope for you anyway, because when I am proved conclusively correct about Mike Ashley [as if 4 years of his "plan" isn't enough already] you will just wriggle your way out of admitting you were spouting bollocks again anyway. What a fuckin big bairn you are man. I'm starting to think you are an even bigger tit than some of the arseholes on NO who also insisted anybody but Fred would be better for the club and also took ambition and knowledge of the club for granted. I think in the end it was established that your view was essentially that because one plan (the Aston Villa plan being the particular case study) failed, that was conclusive evidence that all plans were bad or not worth making. Which of course is just palpable nonsense. That one I'm not even getting into as (despite claiming I'm obsessed), I can quite clearly see what defect of reason lies at the bottom of that 'debate'. Crazy. Give it a rest man. Once a tit always a tit. You were wrong and haven't got it in you to admit it. Obsessed or what. Basically that paragraph represented your view so I stand by the statement.

Fuck off.

give it a rest. Mike Ashley will never match the Halls and Shepherd, even with his "plan", and the limit of his ambition is to survive in the premiership with as little expenditure as possible. Only a complete prick can't see that, like you. And whats more, you won't admit you were wrong when this stares you in the face either. Now. Fuck off, and stop derailing threads and stalking me, you are boring and a tosser without the balls to admit you have been proved completely wrong. Bookmark this thread. See my post (above) in response to Skidders. Answer in your own time. One line, a future event and it has to contradict something I'm saying. Thread bookmarked. I've told you already what will happen and you have disagreed. You have bookmarked the thread. Good. Have you searched for your posts when you said Villa's "plan" would do better than the "planless" Halls and shepherd yet ? I don't hold out much hope for you anyway, because when I am proved conclusively correct about Mike Ashley [as if 4 years of his "plan" isn't enough already] you will just wriggle your way out of admitting you were spouting bollocks again anyway. What a fuckin big bairn you are man. I'm starting to think you are an even bigger tit than some of the arseholes on NO who also insisted anybody but Fred would be better for the club and also took ambition and knowledge of the club for granted. I think in the end it was established that your view was essentially that because one plan (the Aston Villa plan being the particular case study) failed, that was conclusive evidence that all plans were bad or not worth making. Which of course is just palpable nonsense. That one I'm not even getting into as (despite claiming I'm obsessed), I can quite clearly see what defect of reason lies at the bottom of that 'debate'. Crazy.

Pretty much my opinon. I dislike to much MA has done and every time I start to think he is finally "getting it" he makes another fuck up of a decision. TBF, we were spoiled by the highs of the previous regime and many made this the benchmark. Loads of clubs would be happy with MA and the way he is running the club. Me? I think he is a wanker of the highest order. However, I do now think we are in a better position than we were when he took over. Pains me to say it. The Halls etc brought us the best times I known supporting this club and it would not surprise me if I dont see them again in my lifetime. But football has changed, not just our club. The league was easier than it was now as well. What I dont get is why some people think that you can only support Ashley or Shepherd and not see the merit of both regimes while taking on board the fuck ups of both? Aye, spot on! Or just be entitled to a balanced view, in other words.

Nee chance of them playing then! Good. Advantage us so let's do ourselves a favour and win a winnable game.

What were the injuries? Genuinely don't know. If they're just post match 'niggles' then I'll bet one gets fit for the weekend at least. If they're both out then there's no excuses for not picking up 3 points providing we're up for it. Barton back and (potentially) Ireland to come in for us should give us the momentum needed, so fingers crossed they're available.

give it a rest. Mike Ashley will never match the Halls and Shepherd, even with his "plan", and the limit of his ambition is to survive in the premiership with as little expenditure as possible. Only a complete prick can't see that, like you. And whats more, you won't admit you were wrong when this stares you in the face either. Now. Fuck off, and stop derailing threads and stalking me, you are boring and a tosser without the balls to admit you have been proved completely wrong. Bookmark this thread. See my post (above) in response to Skidders. Answer in your own time. One line, a future event and it has to contradict something I'm saying. Thread bookmarked.