Jump to content

manc-mag

Donator
  • Posts

    16306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by manc-mag

  1. Did you? I was in for bit and then left Why didn't you introduce yourself you berk? I did to Matty and MancMag (a handsome chap )and said alright to Alex and Catmag but it was a bit cliquey. and there was a couple of lads i like to talk to but i always forget what they post as, Walliver i think? Tom man was that you? Jesus what was going on yesterday? I saw Luke on the way to the ground and he had an affro and i saw Greg who was (literally, in his own words) 6 stones lighter than when I last saw him. It's like everyone was in disguise. Has your hair got a lot lighter or summat? What's changed?
  2. How obsessed are you with 'being right' you massively inadequate cretin?
  3. More contrary bollocks from you. Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles. Right-o. Utter bumlicking hypocrisy. First off you have the overly sensitive wannabe doctor who deliberately attacks my posts at every opportunity because of one off-hand remark I once made, and then you have the scally lawyer who thinks he's the definitive judge and jury for this board, an arrogance which isn't helped by his sychopantic clique buddies. Fuck right off, the pair of you. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with, btw, since Luke's label of me as being contrary is somewhat in opposition to the 'precious claptrap' you've deigned to assign to me. Out of interest, what proportion of my other posts have been precious claptrap? Since it's my trademark, I'd assume it to be quite high. Unless you're talking shite again. Or in fact as that should read: But of course the truth and lawyers are rarely seen in the same sentence. You clueless embarrasment.
  4. More contrary bollocks from you. Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles. Right-o. Utter bumlicking hypocrisy. First off you have the overly sensitive wannabe doctor who deliberately attacks my posts at every opportunity because of one off-hand remark I once made, and then you have the scally lawyer who thinks he's the definitive judge and jury for this board, an arrogance which isn't helped by his sychopantic clique buddies. Fuck right off, the pair of you. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with, btw, since Luke's label of me as being contrary is somewhat in opposition to the 'precious claptrap' you've deigned to assign to me. Out of interest, what proportion of my other posts have been precious claptrap? Since it's my trademark, I'd assume it to be quite high. Unless you're talking shite again. I happened to express a moderate opinion in response to Fop's trademark hysteria. If you see that as arrogance then fair enough tbh. Personally, I would say a more compelling example of arrogance would be the unsolicited testimonials on your website. For the record I think you take yourself remarkably seriously and have a bit of an over inflated opinion of yourself. Examples of this would be the fact I know anything at all about your "successful relationship" status and the fact that you earn more than certain posters you don't like (I think the lad might have worked in a supermarket or summat). Apparently though this vision of success gets very easily threatened, at which point you come across as a bit of a delicate flower and your posting style becomes distinctly defensive and/or precious. For some reason I get the distinct impression that Luke threatens you. Alex called it right with the Thompers/hypocrite observation btw. You are.
  5. More contrary bollocks from you. Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles.
  6. His cheeks will be glowing red with rage right now. any need for the 'with rage' bit? Precisely.
  7. His cheeks will be glowing red with rage right now.
  8. Ritchie wears jumpers without sleeves and can't be trusted.
  9. I reckon this might be partially why you don't notice how police officers actually are. Please tell me you now specialise in housing law or something? cuckoo!
  10. Fop you boss-eyed wank hound! If anything, Fish is the dissenting voice on many issues and he doesn't shy away from giving his opinion even when his is the minority voice.
  11. At what stage does it become unacceptable irrespective of their celebrity btw? Presumably nobody wants an 80 year old's notch on their bedpost?
  12. Any movement/further thoughts on this yet? Apparently wor lass has arranged to do some entertaining on this weekend (she organises weeks/months in advance like a military operation) and I'm expected to do my bit. I reckon I'll play whatever we sort out but just wondered if a different date was now favoured? Where's Cath when you reluctantly need her?
  13. Scenes reminiscent of Rodney Marsh and George Best playing out their days at Fulham tbh. Only with less hair obviously.
  14. Every fucker's a 5-a-side Maradonna!
  15. Is that a telescope in your pocket....?
  16. definitely there's very few famous people I wouldnt do just so i could tell my mates down the pub! if i wasnt married of course Patrick Moore?
  17. Nah, that one wouldn't work on me, I have to admit. Said in the third person in the style of the Hunny Monster
  18. She's got a very sexy gravelly voice apparently. I'd phone sex it. I'd be up for that, as long as she didnt come out with any anti-arab shit halfway through. That's unnacceptable.
  19. Even if only just to be able to say you'd done it...?
  20. Correct but they're good from the point of view of getting kids into reading imo. Adults who've read the whole series however... I it's unprecedented on that level so fair do's. The films on the other hand are unmitigated shit.
  21. That's the bit I didn't get-what a shit example to use. Sounds like the type who just doesn't like 'stories' generally.
  22. Harry Potter is unmitigated shit.
  23. How do you make that out? to be honest, Fop will stick a smiley on the end of a lot of posts inferring a greater depth to his words. Often times his words are pretty staid and as poignant as anybody else's, bu this addition of a smiley, in his mind, affords him some degree of gravitas and profundity... when really he's said nothing of note. Mancy is right (as much as anybody who's geographically and stylistically inept can be) but Fop will merrily carousel until the boredom sets in and at that point he will declare himself the winner. Anyone who deems fit to challenge will again be met with a barrage of inane detritus wrapped as sense and formula. Edit:- I'm a true blue sesquipedalian My feeling was and without resorting to his normal largesse Fop was holding his own against a pretty early use of condescending small weapons fire. On the other hand Manc tried to back out early doors seeing the morass his lectors had been drawn into caught as they were in a ravine flanked by the two hills of Fops unwavering quasi-rationale. His Romulus (Sunday supplement style phraseology) and his Remus ( the instinctive need to have a pop at plod). You're not fucking kidding, there. The lad is off his tits.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.