manc-mag

and just how am I supposed to confirm its your nephew? does it end with the credits scrolling and the words "Divvy kid having his tie knotted by bigger boy played by Manc Mags little nephew"? 83625[/snapback] 83627[/snapback] You bell end. It's a Shreddies ad. He's the boy getting his tie knotted. How much more specific do I need to be? Saw it incidentally. Talk about blink-and-you'd-miss-it. The jumped up little prima donna 83637[/snapback] I think it was the words "my nephews the little one, can anyone confirm" that threw me like, cant you recognise your own flesh n blood? tart! 83644[/snapback] I hadnt seen the ad myself at that stage you big hom.

That sounds like Lemmings on the Amiga

Gets the looks from wor side of the family like.

and just how am I supposed to confirm its your nephew? does it end with the credits scrolling and the words "Divvy kid having his tie knotted by bigger boy played by Manc Mags little nephew"? 83625[/snapback] 83627[/snapback] You bell end. It's a Shreddies ad. He's the boy getting his tie knotted. How much more specific do I need to be? Saw it incidentally. Talk about blink-and-you'd-miss-it. The jumped up little prima donna

In all honesty, how big is GF these days? I'd never have thought he had the potential to become a fully accredited fat jabber.

Aye in the mornings but also tea time apparently. Pester power n all that. Still not seen it but I know one or two people have-giz a nudge if you clock it, pet!

you got one I could borrow? 83604[/snapback] I thought Wacky froze his dogs turds and then threw them over the wall? I'm sure there was a thread about that?

83584[/snapback] Genuine helpful advice tbh 83589[/snapback] Aye, a knarrr man. I happen to agree but I just liked the way you said it. In all honesty Zath, I like the sentiments but I'd be cautious about overdoing it! Minister in a referees outfit might be apt mind.

...is in a new Shreddies ad on TV. Apparently it's started screening today but I havent seen it. He doesnt do owt as far as I can gather, just in a scene with another boy who plays his 'brother'(who knots his tie for him). My nephew's the little one. Can anyone confirm?

Some sort of fucking authority on turnips are we?

Because you're the protector of all things furry? 82301[/snapback] Apart from cows, pigs and sheep. 82370[/snapback] Word of advice, don't eat the furry pigs. 82373[/snapback] 82430[/snapback] What about hairy pie? 82437[/snapback] thats right....bring it down to your level !!! 82451[/snapback] The rest of us are on our tiptoes trying to reach that level tbh.

what would you like to chat about ??? 81990[/snapback] Actually I'm just off to watch Celeb BB , but feel free to put the world to rights in this liddle thread 81995[/snapback] oops...forgot ...me too 82000[/snapback] Got my 'My Name is Earl' catch up to watch at 10.30 82004[/snapback] Jason Lee, absolute legend! 82429[/snapback]

I believe that should be pronounced "soooopoyb!" 82384[/snapback] I'm worried that I read it as being pronounced like that straight away, without even getting to your post.... 82395[/snapback] Are you saying my post was obselete and quite simply a waste of everyones time? Are you Lou. Are you? 82397[/snapback] Worry ye not manc- my pronunciation was indeed incorrect and I appreciate your intervention which will have prevented any future embarresment I would have endured 82398[/snapback] Thanks SBTP. I'd never been so insulted tbh.

So- roughly how many ml. did you spew and subsequently have to clean up? You do realise this could be used as a ruse as to why your keyboard is really so sticky. 704[/snapback] 10cc. FACT!

I believe that should be pronounced "soooopoyb!" 82384[/snapback] I'm worried that I read it as being pronounced like that straight away, without even getting to your post.... 82395[/snapback] Are you saying my post was obselete and quite simply a waste of everyones time? Are you Lou. Are you?

Surely the corrogated shape of the aparatus would lead to sandwich structural integrity problems? 82391[/snapback] Not really, he just eats it straight off the grill, snout first.

Pretty much your staple diet tbh.

I believe that should be pronounced "soooopoyb!"

I'm sorry, but there is no way on this earth that SMO has nutmegged Peter Beardsley.

PS surgery closed, my jokes are getting fucking abysmal.

I'm allergic tbh. Quite partial to a fig roll though.

Sounds like a fair deal. My courtroom style is quite theatrical though (I enter to the sound of Prodigy's Firestarter), but as long as you're okay with that.

They'll put your version of events to him and ask for his response to them. They'll then take a view as to which version is the more plausible on the balance of probabilities (as this would be the standard of proof if it ever went to court) and would then get back to him with their conclusions-ie in essence whether they thought they had a good case or whether conversely they thought the litigation risk was so great (for which read 'youre a lying little mackem shitehawk') as to make settlement the better option (ie admit liability). Ultimately the dispute would be between you and him, not the insurers and therefore if he chose to ignore what his insurer was saying he could still take it to court, though in practice whether this would happen would probably (as with all things) be a matter of money. ie it might be the case that, on the basis of the wording of his policy his insurer would be absolved from funding litigation if they'd made a recommendation to him not to proceed with the dispute. In that potential scenario he'd then have to then fund the process himself..... ......and what with you sat there throwing £50 notes about screaming that you earn more in a day than the court clerk does in a year, he'll soon see his arse over. 81775[/snapback] Cheers mate. So it's not a completely lost cause then, although it'll depend on how ropey his version of events is. I'll see what happens then - I would consider taking the little shit to court on principle like, but it might just be easier to suffer the increased premium if he maintains he's not at fault and his insurance company won't cough up. Might be cheaper an'all - cost of repair is around £1200. 81782[/snapback] Basically mate, just re-iterrate that you were in the outside lane, that you were not speeding and that he didnt indicate (and blatantly couldnt have been keeping a proper lookout if you were already occupying the same space he was apparently so keen on himself). Definitely not a lost cause. Basically at this stage its all talk and seeing how the land lies - his insurer has gone to him and he's said what he's said (perhaps he's waxed it cos he's fucked a works van etc etc-who knows?) but in essence they're gonna at least test the responses they get back. Where it changes though is if/when it gets to court. What you need to stress is, it doesnt matter what the little mackem dickhead is saying now (theres nee recriminations at this stage), ultimately you'd be prepared to put your version down with a signed statement of truth and repeat exactly the same in court-and that youre perfectly aware that to wilfully mis-state anything would be to attempt to pervert the course of justice and you understand that that is an extremely serious offence. He would ultimately have to be able to say the same thing himself-and thats very possibly when he would see his arse. PS hope for Newcastle County Court and not Sunderland County Court. 81801[/snapback] Reet cheers mister. I'm a bit more chilled about it now. I was livid earlier when I first found out cos I thought that was that. 81807[/snapback] No probs. That'll be £5,000 please.

You can always do that and claim it back after if it's decided he's liable.