Gemmill

I had that strip, and the tracksuit with the diagonal grey and white stripes towards the bottom of one of the legs.

Vic is the expert on losing jobs btw.

Gemmill do you even have an argument/a point/thoughts/a brain ? Easy to sit back and try (unsuccessfully i might add) to pick holes in someone else's argument without offering positive thoughts on a route forward yourself. My point is simply this: 1. We are not going to be able to sign a John Terry or a Rio. 2. We 've paid big money for the likes of Boumsong, Shambles and have even brought in experienced Full backs in Car and baba and it hasn't worked out, (failed miserably in fact). Should we 'A' panic and sign another big money defender i.e. Curtis for £9m who may well turn out to be another flop like Shambles or Boum or should we 'B' let pearson work with the very promising potential, crop of youngster defenders and mould them into quality players? Taylor is our future in defence build round him. When i put it like this, surely even Gemmill can figure it out the right move. I don't know how you dare accuse me of having no brain, with some of the thick as pigshit stuff you spout on here. "Let's stick with the current defenders that we have. They might just come good." Have you heard of C. Sign an experienced centre-half? Or are you only allowing yourself the two options, you fucking numbskull. OOOooo don't let me get to you Gemmy baby And who exactly would you have us sign? Give an example? P.s. Not a bad sugestion though for you, who did you steal it off? Honestly mate, you're an idiot and you prove it every time you post on here. A month back you posted your starting 11 if everyone at the club was fit, and it featured Duff at left back. A left winger at left back. A few weeks have passed and now you say that we need sign no defenders despite that fact that you think our best left back is a left winger. Keep up the good work. In future, stick to your TEAM FOR A MATCH 3 WEEKS FROM NOW and PLAYER RATINGS threads. Clearly logical thought is not your strong point.

Gemmill do you even have an argument/a point/thoughts/a brain ? Easy to sit back and try (unsuccessfully i might add) to pick holes in someone else's argument without offering positive thoughts on a route forward yourself. My point is simply this: 1. We are not going to be able to sign a John Terry or a Rio. 2. We 've paid big money for the likes of Boumsong, Shambles and have even brought in experienced Full backs in Car and baba and it hasn't worked out, (failed miserably in fact). Should we 'A' panic and sign another big money defender i.e. Curtis for £9m who may well turn out to be another flop like Shambles or Boum or should we 'B' let pearson work with the very promising potential, crop of youngster defenders and mould them into quality players? Taylor is our future in defence build round him. When i put it like this, surely even Gemmill can figure it out the right move. I don't know how you dare accuse me of having no brain, with some of the thick as pigshit stuff you spout on here. "Let's stick with the current defenders that we have. They might just come good." Have you heard of C. Sign an experienced centre-half? Or are you only allowing yourself the two options, you fucking numbskull. OOOooo don't let me get to you Gemmy baby And who exactly would you have us sign? Give an example? Not my job to give examples. It's up to the club to establish a scouting network that does this for them. Sticking with the current back line on the off-chance that Edgar and Huntington just might make it as Premiership players is crazy though. How many goals have we conceded in January alone? And you want to persevere with this defence. Interesting as well that in your team for Villa you've selected Duff at left-back. Good way of demonstrating your faith in the defenders you say we should be sticking with.

I like the way that, in the House of the Banned, you're described as "very silly." Kitman - how's New Zealand?

Gemmill do you even have an argument/a point/thoughts/a brain ? Easy to sit back and try (unsuccessfully i might add) to pick holes in someone else's argument without offering positive thoughts on a route forward yourself. My point is simply this: 1. We are not going to be able to sign a John Terry or a Rio. 2. We 've paid big money for the likes of Boumsong, Shambles and have even brought in experienced Full backs in Car and baba and it hasn't worked out, (failed miserably in fact). Should we 'A' panic and sign another big money defender i.e. Curtis for £9m who may well turn out to be another flop like Shambles or Boum or should we 'B' let pearson work with the very promising potential, crop of youngster defenders and mould them into quality players? Taylor is our future in defence build round him. When i put it like this, surely even Gemmill can figure it out the right move. I don't know how you dare accuse me of having no brain, with some of the thick as pigshit stuff you spout on here. "Let's stick with the current defenders that we have. They might just come good." Have you heard of C. Sign an experienced centre-half? Or are you only allowing yourself the two options, you fucking numbskull.

Hmmm...good point. Might just tell him to get the train, and suffer.

Aye, to most people, it's plainly obvious that with promising young players at the club, you need an old head playing alongside them for them to learn from, and to allow them to develop at a reasonable pace. For some reason the fucking divvy in charge seems to want to assemble a back 4 with an average age of around 21.

By the way, Toptoon, you're basically saying that we've got a collection of players that aren't good enough, along with some young lads who may or may not make it one day, plus the "awesome" Steven Taylor, and that we should just stick with them. And you're saying the only alternative to this is panic buying an expensive flop. However I try to look at your argument it just looks like a load of bollocks to me.

TOPTOON - Easily pleased.

Cheers mister. Will get him to get it sorted then.

Right-click on the link at the top of the thread, mick. Is that what you're doing?

He already knows this. Cheers lads, flight probably the least hassle then by the look of things. He was on about hiring a car, but it would be a twat of a drive I would think. I think work is paying so he may as well just fly then hire a car/get a train/taxi from Heathrow.

Night night, filthbag!

Grimbo was spot on about Robert anyway btw. The lad was predominantly lazy and shite in his last season and a half and his career subsequent to his time at NUFC has proven that he's a spent force (despite the wailing from his fans that some other team was going to benefit from his greatness).

I dunno like, I think your reputation may have been enhanced.

BUSTED!

A mate is coming over from America and is heading to Newcastle from Amsterdam, but then has to get from Newcastle to Egham for work. My geographical knowledge of this country is pathetic so was hoping someone on here would know the best way to travel - flight, car, train, whatever? Cheers.

Git! Thats a BOTTLE of wine you owe me Bianca, now do some work and stop playing on a message board!! what i said was to emphsise the difference between what people will do during casual sex with someone they hardly know and what couples do in a meaningful relationship. No no no, what you said was that you take it up the hoop.

Don't you just right click and Save Target As?

Totally busted btw, T-R, cos in that link you specifically refer to "when you've been in a relationship as long as I have, you have to try new things". You should never have accused me of making it up.

http://www.toontastic.net/forum/index.php?...st&p=146101

Oiii I never said such a thing Look what you've done now Bianca!!! I think where it came about was when someone posted that mobile video of that Geordie lass demanding that that lad hoy something up hers, and you responding with "What's wrong with that?" or something along those lines. You then informed us all that certain concessions are required to spice things up. Your memory is shocking Bianca Stop twisting what i really said, which was more along the lines of.... what two people that are in a commited relationship did was up to them. Yes, im sure couples who are together for years must try new things. But i never said anything about ME personally. Thats a large glass of red wine you owe me when i meet you all. You dorty liar! The suggestion was very much that your husband is a Brown Wing Commander. That's TWO glasses of red wine I owe you.

Apparently it's legal to take the stuff but it has to be registered as wreckage and if the owner turns up you have to give it back. Yeah, the lads with the bike had some forms that they were filling in. I would have thought that showing their nice new bike that someone else owns on telly was a bit of a faux pas though.

Oiii I never said such a thing Look what you've done now Bianca!!! I think where it came about was when someone posted that mobile video of that Geordie lass demanding that that lad hoy something up hers, and you responding with "What's wrong with that?" or something along those lines. You then informed us all that certain concessions are required to spice things up.