Super_Steve_Howey

the world doesn't need smug ginger twat's

If i was your fella, hours ago

pregnant?

see 51.

If he bangs a screamer in tomorrow I will feel physically sick, and there will be this doubt knawing away at my soul as to whether he upped his game on the back of the booing he is inevitably going to get he won't score though, he only ever scored on the break, our defence will be deeper than the challenger deep tomorow.

just, well, eh?

52. Keep a secret ( I hope someone's going to add these to the list, I don't want to be wasting my time here... )

Planning and club and player management wise Bolton are light years ahead of us now. they even know how to organise bungs better than us Zurich is in Switzerland right?

Allardyce doesn't like to talk about Nolan though...

I came down to watch wor Craig especially

51. Let it lie

depreciation is a cost whether paid for up-front or on the never never, cars have a finite usable life. you also forgot servicing, which is necessary but a total rip-off, mechanics are complete cunts and cars are stupidly complex these days, plus necessary routine replacement costs such as tyres, bulbs, oil etc. One puncture on my motor and that's a good weekend reduced to a shite one. Also, consider where you work, where you live, and where you are likely to drive, re: parking costs/charges and potential vandalism or damage that your insurance company usually get out of paying for one way another. These repairs are also eye wateringly expensive. Plus, over the likely lifetime of owning a car, there are the unknowns of increasing insurance costs, the green movement on increasing car tax etc, potential road pricing etc etc Finally, consider your health. I went from a fit and healthy person to a fat lazy bastard, without changing anything about my lifestyle or diet/exercise. Only 2 common factors, aging and when I started driving. I've owned a house and a car for years, and made a lot of bad financial decisions that have cost a lot of money, but I feel physically sick whenever I think what I've spent on the car. And I am lucky enough to own the car of my dreams (well, within reason)

why is it a bad thing that most medicines are derived from nature? Are you saying it is immoral to profit from naturally occuring events?

15 to 20% of people with 'AIDS' have no presence of HIV. ??? source?!?!? Just put HIV doesn't cause aids into google....100's of pages will come up. There is doubt around the whole aids/hiv issue since the early 90's. Not saying I beleive it, but it is interesting how thw WHO and drugs companies have steamrollered all the contradictory research. would any of this be credible research? I only say this as I'm pretty sure if you Google 'moon landings faked', you get 100's of pages... Well you should see the carefully constrcted parameters of what constitutes aids then - you couldn't make it up. HIV fails many long standing scientific tests that constitute what a disease causing virus is. For instance monkeys have been injected for 20 years with live HIV and something like 9/10 never develop aids. Ever. part of the reason why a cure is so far off is that HIV isn't a readily identifiable disease. It has many many iterations and mutations IIRC. Alos, it is these non-progressing HIV cases that are being studied for some vaccine leads. HIV is an old virus and has been around for 100's of years....Why it would suddenly start giving people 'aids' is part of the mystery I agree. IIRC HIV the monkey version is old. It was never present in humans until AIDS was noticed, the transition from monkeys to humans is thought to be from tribesmen eating monkeys? or having sex with them (all of this is from memory before someone starts pulling me up on it) Humans getting aid from monkeys is utter cobblers for a start. Closer would be the high use of anti-biotics combined with the gay lifestyle. It has been suggested that the very active sections of the gay community who 'also' use high doses of various anti-biotics to counter the 'results' of this lifestyle (especially in the 90's) MAY have mutated their immune system to exhibit 'aids like' symptoms. This is one theory that has been passed over as it wasn't deemed politically palatable. Of course in fairness there are different types of aids as 'they say' now. The African version behaves totally differently as infection rates and footprint shows it infects men and women equally as against the Western conterpart which is still found predominantly in males. 90% in some areas. The whole HIV aids thing is so wracked with politics and money for Africa, it is difficult IMO for dissenting research (and there are dissenting voices from A grade scientists) to gain a foothold in the public domain. I have no firm opionon but as they have got nowhere in 20 years with HIV perhaps they should look elsewhere. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...st_uids=1349680 like I say this is from memory, google aids monkeys and it's 50/50 for and against " The African version behaves totally differently as infection rates and footprint shows it infects men and women equally as against the Western conterpart which is still found predominantly in males. 90% in some areas." -didn't understand this - are you talking AIDs or HIV??

except you normally can't tell whether he's won 5-0 or lost 5-0 in the post match interview. Miserable ginger cock

are they going to cut his feet off?

Not good news if he thinks every Nigerian hates him. There are a few over here...

comes with the job description surely?

don't drink the 330ml cans of Heineken during Ramadan - they're non-alchoholic

15 to 20% of people with 'AIDS' have no presence of HIV. ??? source?!?!? Just put HIV doesn't cause aids into google....100's of pages will come up. There is doubt around the whole aids/hiv issue since the early 90's. Not saying I beleive it, but it is interesting how thw WHO and drugs companies have steamrollered all the contradictory research. would any of this be credible research? I only say this as I'm pretty sure if you Google 'moon landings faked', you get 100's of pages... Well you should see the carefully constrcted parameters of what constitutes aids then - you couldn't make it up. HIV fails many long standing scientific tests that constitute what a disease causing virus is. For instance monkeys have been injected for 20 years with live HIV and something like 9/10 never develop aids. Ever. part of the reason why a cure is so far off is that HIV isn't a readily identifiable disease. It has many many iterations and mutations IIRC. Alos, it is these non-progressing HIV cases that are being studied for some vaccine leads. HIV is an old virus and has been around for 100's of years....Why it would suddenly start giving people 'aids' is part of the mystery I agree. IIRC HIV the monkey version is old. It was never present in humans until AIDS was noticed, the transition from monkeys to humans is thought to be from tribesmen eating monkeys? or having sex with them (all of this is from memory before someone starts pulling me up on it)

15 to 20% of people with 'AIDS' have no presence of HIV. ??? source?!?!? Just put HIV doesn't cause aids into google....100's of pages will come up. There is doubt around the whole aids/hiv issue since the early 90's. Not saying I beleive it, but it is interesting how thw WHO and drugs companies have steamrollered all the contradictory research. would any of this be credible research? I only say this as I'm pretty sure if you Google 'moon landings faked', you get 100's of pages... Well you should see the carefully constrcted parameters of what constitutes aids then - you couldn't make it up. HIV fails many long standing scientific tests that constitute what a disease causing virus is. For instance monkeys have been injected for 20 years with live HIV and something like 9/10 never develop aids. Ever. part of the reason why a cure is so far off is that HIV isn't a readily identifiable disease. It has many many iterations and mutations IIRC. Alos, it is these non-progressing HIV cases that are being studied for some vaccine leads.

I'd keep quiet about being the Baron of Benwell if I was him, not the kind of thing you publicise to the authorities

15 to 20% of people with 'AIDS' have no presence of HIV. ??? source?!?!? Just put HIV doesn't cause aids into google....100's of pages will come up. There is doubt around the whole aids/hiv issue since the early 90's. Not saying I beleive it, but it is interesting how thw WHO and drugs companies have steamrollered all the contradictory research. would any of this be credible research? I only say this as I'm pretty sure if you Google 'moon landings faked', you get 100's of pages...

from a Galaxy far far away.... Are you a little green man? only towards the end of the night...