trophyshy

Is he not upset you've nicked his website's name for your username? Don't you think he might have liked to use it for himself?

Happy Birthday to you both!

I could go on but can't be arsed, there are dozens at least. Leazes you are unquestionably one of the most, if not the most, abusive posters on this forum. People may wind you up but that is really no excuse and your vitriol is unparalleled once you get going. I think others would have been banned long ago for less. I'm not calling for your banning, just making that observation.

MT don't take no shit!

He says adding to its length.

The longer this thread get the less likely we'll get into Europe.

to 'Over the Wall' tune If Cisse Scores twice and Suarez fuck all then Cisse will ma-atch Suarez's League haul

Monroe Transfer and BallsDeep in the same thread, this could get messy.

A close game with a lot of goals in it. Dare I say 4-3.

As the home side, 2 goals down in a FAQF this is a piss poor showing from them.

No Official Match Thread for the most important game of our season?

Like a Chinese finger trap, the louder the cries that Willo is so obviously feckless the greater weight it places to the argument that Krul should have been more authoritative. Push your fingers in lads.

Divisive, correlation with sitters/standers by the look of it.

And there should be a Pardew option.

Although maybe some people have one of them at 100%. Howay Craig you've fucked this right up.

'Mostly Krul' 'Mostly Williamson' 'About equally' Should cover it.

POLL!

It's fair and reasonable to say they construed to fuck it up together. Krul should clearly have been more decisive, but Williamson should have just hoofed it out when he noted Krul's lack of decisiveness. They can pick the bones out later, rather than the ball. If I fuck something up and my colleague has the chance to catch the ball so we don't sink then I expect him to do it. I don't expect him to add his fuck up on top of mine. They both play in positions where this sort of stuff is absolutely critical, the fact neither of them got it right could demonstrates either a lack of basic nous or a shortfall of trust in the other. Maybe they don't trust eachother, maybe one of them never knows what the other is going to do next, maybe one of them thinks the other is a liability, if so they should still have acted decisively. This, if you chose to argue it that way, points towards their training. So, Pardew out then. Heading it to the side of the keeper was as bad as Krul failing to call it effectively, and probably the last thing Krul expected Willo to do. They'll both live and learn.

Good post Chez, it's pretty ridiculous if people are still not acknowledging he deserves credit. He also has the tricky task of upstream managing which cannot be overstated with our hierarchy. He seems to have a good relationship with them and crowbarred £10m out of them in January. A few years of this progress would be nice. Hopefully Pardew's rising stock will signal buy just too late for England.

Comment under the Guardian piece; http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/mar/25/hatem-ben-arfa-newcastle-united-west-brom

I've been out all day and fired this up about 10 seconds before that debacle. He's fucking shite.

Says the man with the ORANGE turbot.

Atheism is a position. Here is the position of atheism. The evidence for the existence of a god is not sufficient. That's it. How is that hypocritical? Why should people not criticise something they think is not the truth? That's how we as a societies have progressed throughout time. It doesn't happen by sitting around saying, 'Well that seems like bullshit but I better not look for a better explanation because if I show up Gary he'll think I'm a dick'. You're being silly. I don't think you understand me here, i am not talking about normal atheists, i am talking about the ones who without understanding religion just say its bullshit, and try to force their views on people. Last i checked there isn't enough evidence to prove god doesn't exist either When these atheists group together they in a sense form a cult\ religion which is why i said they are hypocrites. So i wasn't being silly mate, its all about perception. Only by truly understanding bullshit can you call it religion. I can announce, fearlessly, that the existence of god or otherwise, will never be proven. Fair play then, just go on your instincts.