Craig

Agree he's a better player, but he's not 3 times the player....

166639[/snapback] And STILL Anal Oliver persists..... 166667[/snapback] He might be right to - there's certainly a chance we'll get him before the season starts. 166677[/snapback] Didn't his 'Dad' come out and say there was no way in hell SWP would be coming up North?? 166682[/snapback] Where? And wasn't Manchester up north? By the way, I think it's Klose who the story is about 166683[/snapback] I meant back up north........pendant!

166639[/snapback] And STILL Anal Oliver persists..... 166667[/snapback] It's not Oliver is it? 166678[/snapback] And you don't think Oliver has any influence on Luke Edwards at all? AO has put his chips on SWP coming here, I bet that 'lead' from this story has come from Oliver!

166639[/snapback] And STILL Anal Oliver persists..... 166667[/snapback] He might be right to - there's certainly a chance we'll get him before the season starts. 166677[/snapback] Didn't his 'Dad' come out and say there was no way in hell SWP would be coming up North??

This is the same Marlon Harewood who, the season before last, wasn't even considered good enough for West Ham in the Championship and most of their fans wanted him gone. He had a better season last year - he's no improvement on what we have and we don't have the luxury of being able to buy 'willy-nilly'. Ashton - yes please! Harewood - no thanks!

Well I for one think Bramble has deserved it. He's certainly started to get his head down and concentrate more. Just need a new left back coming in and then he won't have to worry unduly about covering Babayaro's 'wanderings'...

166639[/snapback] And STILL Anal Oliver persists.....

Scott Parker offers considerably better value for money IMO!

Well now that I've perused the said video, I suspect that when she realises that it's been released in the open it probably won't be the first time she's been disappointed.... And if I was the boyfriend, there's no way I'd have let that in the open - two minute taffy tbh!

You're right whereas you often hear lasses from other parts of the country saying 'I love a Scunthorpe accent' 166495[/snapback] No such thing as a Scunthorpe accent, but nice try 166508[/snapback] You have a 'brummy' accent by all accounts

He did win the world cup though! (I know, I know....so did Gui'varch! )

That's cos he's still wanking over the idea of SWP making his way north!

But you did it your way ? 166391[/snapback] I did it sideways 166392[/snapback] Kinky 166394[/snapback] I seriously worry about your 'wank-bank' at times Mr W!

According to .COM, we're going to be drawn against one of these.... Estonia: Levadia Tallinn Ireland: Drogheda United Latvia: Ventspils Lithuania: Kaunas Wales: Llanelli

Just mentioned it to a bloke in the office that they've signed Pennant. He just chuckled away to himself saying "Bellamy and Pennant at the same club, that should be fun........" 165323[/snapback] Liverpool to pick up our title as the brat brigade I think. Any chance of them getting Anelka? 166360[/snapback] Robbie Savage as well! 166365[/snapback] diego maradona pointless exercise really isn't this? 166367[/snapback] Violet out of the 'Just William' books. 166373[/snapback] if we're going down this route then surely we need that photo of alreetlike huffing when she was a kid!

Batman of the internet tbh. 166371[/snapback] fame at last!

Thanks, I'm rather pleased with it myself, it really does sum him up, especially the playboy logo 166358[/snapback] I can offer you the actual UK number-plate font if you want to make it look even more realistic

Just mentioned it to a bloke in the office that they've signed Pennant. He just chuckled away to himself saying "Bellamy and Pennant at the same club, that should be fun........" 165323[/snapback] Liverpool to pick up our title as the brat brigade I think. Any chance of them getting Anelka? 166360[/snapback] Robbie Savage as well!

Who do you think I am, the internet police?

The whole crux of the clip in question is that you have to pay to watch it. If it's posted on YouTube, it's evading that payment. Would it be right for us to walk through an open gate at SJP rather than pay for a ticket? 166140[/snapback] Thanks for clearing things up. I disagree slightly with you on the matter, however. Now, hacking off clips from Newcastle World would be unfair since those clips belong completely to the club. But suppose Im capping clips from Sky or BBC, im paying for those channels and the club itself gets a good deal of money in broadcasting rights etc from those channels. Thus in my opinion its fair to have a ban on distributing clips from Newcastle World, but not from other sources. Even if the clips reach people who havent subscribed for those channels, the club shouldnt be bothered. The fee they get more than compensates for that in my opnion. 166312[/snapback] If Sky turn around and ask for clips of something that was displayed on one of their channels to be removed, they are well within their rights as they own the copyright and it is allowing the possibility of someone who has not paid a subscription to view their material. Same goes for the BBC really because people who have not paid the TV licence would be able to view material. The only 'safe' submissions to YouTube are effectively home-made clips 166327[/snapback] What excatly would qualify as 'home-made'? I thought home-made compilations are banned as well. 166331[/snapback] Home-made?? Camcorder stuff - you filmed it, you own it! 166340[/snapback] like the video of imogen that her ex boyfriend released on the net 166353[/snapback] And the link is?

Now thats a euphenism if ever there was one. 166342[/snapback] Sounds like the plot out of some dodgy porn film!

Pineapple Head? 166320[/snapback] Detective is flat, no longer is always flat out... 166328[/snapback] Got the number of the getaway car, didn't get very far.... *Can always rely on you Dave *

The whole crux of the clip in question is that you have to pay to watch it. If it's posted on YouTube, it's evading that payment. Would it be right for us to walk through an open gate at SJP rather than pay for a ticket? 166140[/snapback] Thanks for clearing things up. I disagree slightly with you on the matter, however. Now, hacking off clips from Newcastle World would be unfair since those clips belong completely to the club. But suppose Im capping clips from Sky or BBC, im paying for those channels and the club itself gets a good deal of money in broadcasting rights etc from those channels. Thus in my opinion its fair to have a ban on distributing clips from Newcastle World, but not from other sources. Even if the clips reach people who havent subscribed for those channels, the club shouldnt be bothered. The fee they get more than compensates for that in my opnion. 166312[/snapback] If Sky turn around and ask for clips of something that was displayed on one of their channels to be removed, they are well within their rights as they own the copyright and it is allowing the possibility of someone who has not paid a subscription to view their material. Same goes for the BBC really because people who have not paid the TV licence would be able to view material. The only 'safe' submissions to YouTube are effectively home-made clips 166327[/snapback] What excatly would qualify as 'home-made'? I thought home-made compilations are banned as well. 166331[/snapback] Home-made?? Camcorder stuff - you filmed it, you own it!

The whole crux of the clip in question is that you have to pay to watch it. If it's posted on YouTube, it's evading that payment. Would it be right for us to walk through an open gate at SJP rather than pay for a ticket? 166140[/snapback] Thanks for clearing things up. I disagree slightly with you on the matter, however. Now, hacking off clips from Newcastle World would be unfair since those clips belong completely to the club. But suppose Im capping clips from Sky or BBC, im paying for those channels and the club itself gets a good deal of money in broadcasting rights etc from those channels. Thus in my opinion its fair to have a ban on distributing clips from Newcastle World, but not from other sources. Even if the clips reach people who havent subscribed for those channels, the club shouldnt be bothered. The fee they get more than compensates for that in my opnion. 166312[/snapback] If Sky turn around and ask for clips of something that was displayed on one of their channels to be removed, they are well within their rights as they own the copyright and it is allowing the possibility of someone who has not paid a subscription to view their material. Same goes for the BBC really because people who have not paid the TV licence would be able to view material. The only 'safe' submissions to YouTube are effectively home-made clips

Please god no to Marlon Harewood.... As others have said, he's no better than Shola!