JawD

I particularly like the abstract images but there's something about the first image I like also.

I mostly agree with the comments but there is one critical position which I think led to our relegation. Manager. The reason imo that we went down was not due to players but the mismanagement of the club as a whole. Morale was rock bottom and we had multiple so called managers with different idea's and approaches. No wonder the side didnt know what they were doing and in the end it was like every man for himself. This alone make now the winner over then as we have a side all pulling in the same direction focussed on the job in hand.

I get loads of emails asking for account info. Many of them offering to pay me thousands of dollars for some simple transactions. I dont have time to look at them so I could give them your details if you like. Im sure they would get your password sorted in seconds. Edit : Damn Ant, same thinking though

The most expensive way to drink coffee. Just get a filter machine and spend money on the quality of the coffee and not on little round bits of gold packaging and sexy writing. The writing isnt that sexy tbf

I still like my Tassimo but having used it a while now I'd say my only gripe was that the portion sizes are for gnomes. I like my coffee in a mug, so i can either use 2 pods per cup (3 in some cases) or add extra water which dilutes. Still canny though.

And THAT is why chinees shred ducks.

Him, not keegan was our best manager of the last 20 years. if he was given the same relative budgets and support, i reckon we could have cracked the top 2 again. It's a tough one for me. I think one of the greatest tragedies of our last 20 or so years though (perhaps even more than not winning the league in 96) was him not taking over when KK left. I think he could've worked wonders with that team. SBR would have tweeked KK's team where it needed and not ripped it apart bringing in his mates.

Rob the WUM and by fuck its working I know he's on the wind-up tbf but I see no problem in demonstrating the fallacy of his argument at the same time. aye, of course maybe he actually believes what he say I quote a fact - you may not like it - he's won 34 out of 56 played or 60.7% - KK in 92-97 was 55% But based on your theory. They both had very similar ratio's in their first full season: KK 1992/3 W29 of 46 = 63% CH 2009/10 W30 of 46 = 65% Now KK followed this with W23 of 42 = 55% See where I'm going with this?

he is dear boy he is tell me who has a better record of results? Stan Seymour - FA Cup twice Joe Harvey - Div 2 Champs ( equivalent to today's Championship) and Fairs Cup. If Chris wins us the FA or League cup, then he may equal these two. Long way to go til he's the most successful. if you look at games won v games played he's wayyyy ahead............ and all my life I've wanted a consistent (winning) team If the ratio is the same in 2 years I'll agree.

Got to back Alex on this one like. You simply can't compare antything CH has or has not done yet. He hasnt had a proper stint at the top tier and you cant compare his one good season in the Championship against some of our great managers who spent years in the top flight. Its just far too early. As for being successful, surely winning something is the pinnacle of success? Not like our list is very long to choose from there. After that Id say Europe and top tier progress.

Quite similar. But maybe because my expectations were so low. Then again, realistic. I dont think you can simply measure how you have done by how much you spent? Thats more a pissing contest. Id sooner get the better deals than blow millions way over the odds on players like Man City. I mean look at Sunderland? They were actually one of the highest spending clubs? But Im happier with our lot. Ben Arfa I think could be a great signing if his head stays here, also good that we held our nerve on that one. Dels like Sol and Gosling could be excellent given their value and so on. Overall, I'm happy with the signings made. I wanted a forward but Im not sure if CH will play Ben Arfa as a forward or just behind Carroll etc. Squad still thin in area's though. I do think its good enough to stay up though.

I did laugh at this like Gyan - 50 goals in 255 games Shola - 42 in 211.

Some peoples RAM may be to slow to access different sites at speed mate. I'm lucky me computers got 4gb ram and I've got the xtra large internet package. I can get info across on here fast. Not all me info is from the BBC as I say I can access different sites at speed. Some nice pics above by the way but this not a scouse thread this a transfer deadline thread so keep the info coming please lads

Off to Wigan

While Id liked to have seen a forward come in, Im wondering what CH's intention is with Hatem?

With or without Heskey Rooney's been totally shite, for club and country since scoring in Munich in March. and the recent Pen doesnt take away how shit he's been either.

1 x egg salad 1 x small pack sushi 1 x muller rice Then for this afternoon 125g blueberries 1 bag beef jerky

And without a big crowd or quality signings?

Given that stupid statement I wasn't expecting much if anything from this transfer window so as it stands I'm very happy. If Ben Arfa and Tiote turn out to be what they've been talked up as (and we have a reasonable injury time), I can see us getting up towards mid table saftey. Who's going to score goals? Carroll? rely on him all year when he could be going to jail, nolan a shit PL midfeilder? I also notice santa cruz ain't going on loan to lazio.. hughton hughton sign him up! Carroll wont be getting sent down man. He may well get injured though. I'd liked to have seen another foward but remains to be seen if CH is planning on one up front with Hatem supporting.

City or Sunderland? From what I seen of the game it was more City being shite.

You can like. Spot a mackem accent a mile off. Lass at work is a mackem and we take the piss out of her accent all the time.

TT: If you want to joinToontastic, you have to really hate the Mackems. Curious Yank: I do! TT: Oh yeah, how much? Curious Yank: A lot! TT: Right, you're in.

My first. Cost me £300 in 1992.

Cheers. Wolfshot is from the Hancock Museum / Great Northern Museum.