Christmas Tree

Beautiful TV’s if you can avoid screen burn in. Most can, but I’m not 100% sure the risks is worth it at those price points especially as not covered by warranty.

Watched shit loads of reviews from hdvtest, a forums, rtings etc. Seems to beat all the other competition such as Samsung Q90r etc on overall picture quality. I would have gone for oled but too worried about screen burn in. Seems that this model with the x1 processor and android 9 update is about as good as you can get for led at around £1100 I can u sets tans going cheaper but as I will not change for about 5 years then this ticks most of the boxes for main room.

Went for the Sony xg95 on bnpl so that future CT has to sort this out and not me.

It’s pretty simplistic, if Starmer moves to centre / slight centre left, he’ll romp home.

8-0 thrashing of SW YouTube 3pm Saturday

I’ve used this brown bread recipe twice and very nice both times. https://www.dovesfarm.co.uk/recipes/traditional-wholemeal-bread

My last word on this. Other than taking my approach of radically protecting the elderly and getting the rest of us back to work, HOW else does this end? The virus is here and we have no vaccine. Do we stay locked down for a year, five, 10? How many millions do we let lose their jobs, their homes, their education? What happens when the government can’t sell any more debt to pay for everything? We could hide away til the r rate is 0.3 but at some point when we all come out it will rapidly rise. If not my plan, then WHAT plan.

Even though I’ve continually argued in favour of radically protecting the pensioners

Never said it was.

If everyone goes back to work I won’t need to stay in the house, I’ll have customers

Not at all, I’ve suggested everything is radically focussed on protecting the elderly and getting the country back to normal.

Nobody’s flying, commuting to London via train, drinking in restaurants or pubs, visiting hospitals, getting home deliveries, and are instead working from home..... Thought you were good at math.

Now you are being thick. The death rate for the working population is 0.0062% Death rates move around a bit depending on sample size but not enough to vastly change the very small risk for that age group.

WRONG! The death rate for 16-64 (the working population is tiny). 0.0062% according to professor Renton. That level of risk is minuscule to the very real risk the lockdown is causing.

There is no work

Only published today. I know you know how stats work.

The point I’ve tried to make is that the chances of this killing anyone aged 16-64 are tiny where as the damage the lockdown is doing to health, jobs etc are very real. You are not going to stop driving because of a small risk you might crash and die. Throw everything at protecting those in danger and everyone else get back to life. Other than a vaccine, THIS is the only way out.

I think your maths is wrong

ONS data published this morning. (Taxi drivers and Chefs most at risk )

Because the whole country is paralysed with fear so much so that many people who are factually are more likely to die in a car crash than from corona are too scared to leave their home, visit the doctors. Protect those who are at risk, give the NHS everything it needs and get the rest of the country back to some sort of normality.

Worth bearing in mind the death rate for this amongst the working age population is very, very small. 2,494 from 40 million = 0.00006 % That tiny risk needs weighing up against the missed cancer diagnosis, the rising unemployment, the companies going bust. The chance of dying in a car crash is 0.00005%

:lol: I think it’s been around a bit longer than that.

Because the new normal is going to need everyone, politicians, business, unions working together to create it. IMO

To focus minds on what we should do now. Nationalise care homes, build nightingale care homes, transfer all care staff to NHS status. Etc