Jump to content

Kevin Carr's Gloves

Members
  • Posts

    11691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Kevin Carr's Gloves

  1. Aha! You know that, FOR GREAT JUSTICE!!!! So do you know how to adjust the tappets on an engine?
  2. Isn't Linux just a sparse variation of unix?
  3. I was a Nuclear Biological and chemical Recce specialist. It's all shit scary.
  4. A common mis diagnosis among the Irish p.s. Ewerk this is a dig at LM not the Irish
  5. Little miss sunshine. Didn't even make it to the end of the film. Unadulterated shite. Let's try to make this as quirky as possible. How about trying to make it either A: Funny or B: Entertaining or C: Thrilling did not live up to any of these criteria which is why I watch films (you can through in knowledge enhancement but knew it wasn't going to be that). The History Boys. Loved it funny and endearing although it was a bit of an Alan Bennet gay fantasy film where all the schoolboys want teacher to suck them off.
  6. They probably are as we were an embarrassment last night. lets see now.........all the clubs that don't play in europe are laughing at us, right ? Do you think manu are embarrassing when they are knocked out of the Champions League ???? I don't expect you to understand this mind ........ I know what you are saying, BUT, should we measure our standards on the failures of others? If Liverpool finish third and fail to get an automatic champions league place should they be thankful as the rest of the league finished below them? If (or rather when) west ham get relegated should they accept it as at least they arnt in the 2nd division? Just because we have been in a worst predicament doesnt mean our current state is acceptable? If you aim for average, you get average at best. As for being embarrassed. Yes it is. After we promise so much in the first leg, this performance was embarrassing. The negative approach (again) is embarrassing. We were completely played off the park from front to back. my point - which I realise that you get, along with one or two others - but Baggio and numerous others won't - is that I doubt very much that supporters of the clubs who never qualify for europe, along with supporters of those who have qualified but not so often as us, will be laughing. If they are its only to wind people up on message boards. I know that when we had shit directors and spent years getting nowhere near europe I didn;t laugh at clubs who were obviously superior to us - I mean, only an idiot does that and only a bigger idiot thinks they do. In fact, I meet many supporters of other clubs and almost to a man - apart from the fuckwits who "support" certain other clubs that you would expect to spout bullshit - they are not "embarrassed" or "laughing at us " at all, they wanted us to go through last night, and all the other rounds too, and they wish their own clubs were able to compete in europe ..... So far as last night is concerned, I think that I could have picked a team that would have scored a goal, instead being outplayed and outpassed, but that is only opinion. One point also worth mentioning, is that, once AGAIN, you could say that the players who play for Newcastle United didn't turn out for a big game. Now who do you blame for that, other than the players ........ This is what annoys the fuck out of me your "We should be happy we aren't worse". Fucking bastard no. We pump fucking millions into this fucking club and all we get is shit and excuses. I am never going to be happy being better than others until we are better than everyone. Now I can be happy with performances but being lower down the leageue than others like when SBR had us finishing just outside the top 4. But our performances are shite. Why the fuck should I be happy with that. Oh I forgot we are the fifth best shite. Firstly, I've never said I am "happy". Only pointed out that we have done fairly well, and moved forward a lot under the current board, and it would be very easy to end up with a board far worse than what we have. The proof of this possibility is everywhere, if people open their eyes and consider the possibilities, and events that have happened at other clubs throughout history. It's basic common sense, but it appears many people lack it. People who supported the club pre-1992 ought to be aware of this. I don't understand how they are not. But, see the post by spongebob, the idiots who come on here and insist that "everyone is laughing at us", are talking complete utter bollocks. I am fucking aware of it you twat that we could end up worse but fucking hell we are not in a good fucking position and am sick to death of you fucking well coming along and telling us to stop complaining. We have every fucking right to complain. And pre 1992 we weren't always shit pre 1992 we had some good times and some bad times. we won everything we have ever won pre 1992. In fact post 1992 we are in our most barren state than ever before because post 1992 we have won nothing. We have however benefitted from a complete overhaul of European competition. At the moment the club is in the shit. We are mid table at best with a clueless manager. Now if the fat fuck knows this then why is he not doing something about it.
  7. They probably are as we were an embarrassment last night. lets see now.........all the clubs that don't play in europe are laughing at us, right ? Do you think manu are embarrassing when they are knocked out of the Champions League ???? I don't expect you to understand this mind ........ I know what you are saying, BUT, should we measure our standards on the failures of others? If Liverpool finish third and fail to get an automatic champions league place should they be thankful as the rest of the league finished below them? If (or rather when) west ham get relegated should they accept it as at least they arnt in the 2nd division? Just because we have been in a worst predicament doesnt mean our current state is acceptable? If you aim for average, you get average at best. As for being embarrassed. Yes it is. After we promise so much in the first leg, this performance was embarrassing. The negative approach (again) is embarrassing. We were completely played off the park from front to back. my point - which I realise that you get, along with one or two others - but Baggio and numerous others won't - is that I doubt very much that supporters of the clubs who never qualify for europe, along with supporters of those who have qualified but not so often as us, will be laughing. If they are its only to wind people up on message boards. I know that when we had shit directors and spent years getting nowhere near europe I didn;t laugh at clubs who were obviously superior to us - I mean, only an idiot does that and only a bigger idiot thinks they do. In fact, I meet many supporters of other clubs and almost to a man - apart from the fuckwits who "support" certain other clubs that you would expect to spout bullshit - they are not "embarrassed" or "laughing at us " at all, they wanted us to go through last night, and all the other rounds too, and they wish their own clubs were able to compete in europe ..... So far as last night is concerned, I think that I could have picked a team that would have scored a goal, instead being outplayed and outpassed, but that is only opinion. One point also worth mentioning, is that, once AGAIN, you could say that the players who play for Newcastle United didn't turn out for a big game. Now who do you blame for that, other than the players ........ This is what annoys the fuck out of me your "We should be happy we aren't worse". Fucking bastard no. We pump fucking millions into this fucking club and all we get is shit and excuses. I am never going to be happy being better than others until we are better than everyone. Now I can be happy with performances but being lower down the leageue than others like when SBR had us finishing just outside the top 4. But our performances are shite. Why the fuck should I be happy with that. Oh I forgot we are the fifth best shite.
  8. You're wrong. About everything. Fact.
  9. Excellent article; Leazes will dismiss it as the work of a know-nothing southern fancy dan journalist. Us summed up. I think he already has read the first post on the article.
  10. Fucking love that episode I want to open a chocolate shop called the chocolate runway.
  11. This is my worry. Roeder returning to the long ball. When we kept the ball on the ground like Nobby advised in the paper we were awesome. But when Rodders made us play hump ball we were shit again. Exactly how we played.
  12. It is blatantly obvious Roeder didnt have a clue. When Huntington was getting raped time and again the only one offering him any support was Duff. So what does thick twat do he takes duff off. It was also blatantly obvious we needed to attack on the wings so what does thick twat do he decides a team of central midfielders will do the trick. With 25 minutes to go when everyone could see we wouldn't score with that team if we played till a week on Thursday he should have taken off Huntington and Butt/ Parker and Sibierski. Put Nzogbia on the left moving Duff back put Emre in the middle and Milner on the wing and Dyer up front with Martins. He is such a useless cock end.
  13. I can't disagree more we have been nowhere near creating with this long ball shite. Every time it gets humped it comes straight down our throat 5 seconds later.
  14. We shouldn't be surprised apart from about 5 games it is how we have played all season..
  15. Looking forward to seeing Roeder get the sack Would you trust Fred to replace him with someone other than Lee Clark? With any luck the fat fuck will die of a coronary soon.
  16. Looking forward to seeing Roeder get the sack
  17. Waste after waste after waste after waste. I fucking hate Roeder.
  18. Rodders is doing exactly what we knew he would and exactly what we knew he shouldn't. He has all the tactical nous of of a seven year old.
  19. If you are in glasgow have a pop into Caley uni and see all the people smoking right under the no smoking signs.
  20. LONDON (Reuters) - Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern said he was still committed to a united Ireland, speaking in an interview with the Guardian published on Thursday. "The Good Friday agreement provided a historic breakthrough in relation to the future of Northern Ireland," Ahern told the newspaper, referring to the 1998 agreement that largely ended 30 years of political and sectarian conflict there. (Advertisement) "I am personally deeply committed to a united Ireland and I make no secret of that fact," he said. "But the most important thing is that we have peace and hopefully reconciliation between everyone on this island. We need to have a unity and a friendship among the people and that must be our first priority." The comments came as Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams said a deal on power-sharing in Northern Ireland was within reach, speaking after talks with Prime Minister Tony Blair. London and Dublin have given Northern Ireland's parties until March 26 to agree to share power in a local executive or face the indefinite continuation of direct British rule. Regardless of the historical rights and wrongs if Ireland became united the troubles would erupt like nothing before. The UVF UFF et al would go on a rampage equatable to what happened in the former yugoslavia.
  21. If you read all of what I said I don't actually think that. All I know is you don't get anyone more selfish than a smoker. What a load of bollocks absolutely true. All think that their right to smoke outweighs everyone else's right to clean air. Even if that were true, which it isn't, how would that make them any more selfish than a non-smoker who owned a massive gas guzzler of a car or any number of equally or more selfish individuals. If you'd said some smokers are very selfish, you'd be right. To state "you don't get anyone more selfish than a smoker" is totally preposterous. But that would be an exception not a generalising fact. Look at the uproar from the smokers at the announcement at the smoking ban. And those that continue to flaunt it. Sorry? What would be the exception? I don't understand the point you're making. Also, most of the 'uproar' has come from pressure groups with vested interests rather than individual smokers imo. Like I said, some are selfish but you suggested no one is more selfish than a smoker. I agree with the ban though. You said that a smoker would be the same as a none smoker with a gas guzzling car. Therefore saying that all non smokers have a gas guzzling car. That is what would be an exception. How did you work that out from what I said? You say smokers are no more selfish than a non smoker with a gas guzzling car. All Smokers smoke and this is bad. Not all none smokers do bad stuff. Is that clearer
  22. Needs to be tested a little more to confirm that I think.
  23. Nobody outside of Glasgow should support them. It just promotes the religious differences. And before anyone argues I don't equate this the same as someone from outside Newcastle supporting NUFC. They don't support NUFC because of their religion. I also realise this is not 100% the case but it is in the significant majority.
  24. If you read all of what I said I don't actually think that. All I know is you don't get anyone more selfish than a smoker. What a load of bollocks absolutely true. All think that their right to smoke outweighs everyone else's right to clean air. Even if that were true, which it isn't, how would that make them any more selfish than a non-smoker who owned a massive gas guzzler of a car or any number of equally or more selfish individuals. If you'd said some smokers are very selfish, you'd be right. To state "you don't get anyone more selfish than a smoker" is totally preposterous. But that would be an exception not a generalising fact. Look at the uproar from the smokers at the announcement at the smoking ban. And those that continue to flaunt it. Sorry? What would be the exception? I don't understand the point you're making. Also, most of the 'uproar' has come from pressure groups with vested interests rather than individual smokers imo. Like I said, some are selfish but you suggested no one is more selfish than a smoker. I agree with the ban though. You said that a smoker would be the same as a none smoker with a gas guzzling car. Therefore saying that all non smokers have a gas guzzling car. That is what would be an exception.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.