-
Posts
3871 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Baggio
-
Which coincidentally was when Leazes flouced off and kept a low profile when he returned. Strange that. As I've said a few times lately, he doesn't know any other way to behave so any talk of having a word with him or giving him a warning is falling on deaf ears.
-
Ba will leave after a club meets his buy out. We will sign 3 players that walk into the first team. We sign at least 3 young lads to beef up the squad.
-
Wigan Athletic vs Newcastle United Saturday 28th April 3pm
Baggio replied to Christmas Tree 's topic in Newcastle Forum
Any other time I would predict a win there but after 6 wins in a row I find myself thinking that a slip up is just around the corner... -
1. fits in well with Douglas not being available until the end of August .
-
I thought your descriptions of him as a forum virus the other day was spot on and reading posts from years ago where he gets into the same debates just highlights that more. At a time when we should all be getting excited about the season finale and enjoying the ride we are having to go through the same shit every day, I bet fans from other clubs look at this place to see our opinions on our strong finish and leave wondering what the fucking hell is going on. You know it's bad when people are avoiding the football forum while we're pushing for a champions league place.
-
*Puts Leazes back on ignore...
-
I was thinking more like Lost "Two players, two sides. One is light, one is dark" I'll say I'm the dark one before someone else does
-
That's how I understood it, so I'm right in thinking that even though we've paid out already for the 3 it will show up though amortization over the next few years?
-
You so funny
-
I was reading on RTG when their accounts comes out and some guy on there posted a link to the Arsenal accounts that said players going out go through the books at once where as players incoming go through over the length of their contract. Would explain why we made £32 profit despite buying Ben Arfa, Tiote and Perch in the same financial year.
-
Worked up Renton put the question to Leazes which he ignored, we both know he done this because he knows they couldn't compete yet he won't admit it as he would have little to go on about.
-
Renton was the one that asked you the question that you avoided so that's what it has to do with him. The post in this thread wasn't about getting you banned, more pointing out that you've been the same for years so won't change. I'm banned from N-O which I've told you a few times when you've said that before, although you're a good one to talk about anyone flouncing off after you did the other week. Now are you going to answer Renton's question or not?
-
Instead of jumping on the back of other posts why don't you go back and answer the question that Renton put to you that you ignored?
-
You could of saved yourself writing the previous post then by just saying they couldn't compete.
-
So they couldn't have competed now then and would have had to sell? You've said a lot while completely avoiding the original question.
-
So who actually thinks we will finish 4th?
Baggio replied to Kid Dynamite's topic in Newcastle Forum
Formula predicts Spurs will finish 6th. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17853271 -
I think I've known Leazes on these forums for the best part 9 years and I can tell you now he will never change, I genuinely doesn't know any other way to debate a point. I can remember when we all got a warning on N-O for the same discussion he wants to have every day on here still and they said then that they know he's annoying and that they've been having words with him for 4 years! That was about 4 years ago too So he won't change, he will continue the way he is until the admin say enough is enough and get rid of him, like they did over there.
-
So sell to someone else then
-
I was wondering what your point was, if you had one.
-
Given the downward spiral we found ourselves in on the pitch, the new competition from super rich owners, and our own flailing finances, how do you suppose the old board were going to compete for the title? Serious question btw.
-
You seem to have missed his question at the bottom. Given the downward spiral we found ourselves in on the pitch, the new competition from super rich owners, and our own flailing finances, how do you suppose the old board were going to compete for the title? Serious question btw.
-
Even though we are above them they were still bankrolled so I'm not sure what your point is there. If you look a few posts up I said I'd take you off ignore if you're not spouting the same old shit every single day but if you do again I'll just put you on ignore again, it's that simple.
-
Yes and?
-
Since Abramovich took over you've had Chelsea, Man City, Villa, Wolves and Sunderland had money pumped in by their owners at one point or another. Liverpool I'm not so sure of as their last lot of accounts haven't been released yet but Man Utd, Arsenal and Spurs are just more successful money making clubs than ourselves. So if you consider the 2 bankrolled clubs at the top, the 3 richer clubs than us plus Liverpool whichever side they fall on leaves us 7th.
-
While I agree with the majority of your post, I felt that the level 7 lot were split up because they wouldn't sit down rather than then singing songs again him.