NJS

As has been said already, even if the speculation went down a bit, two things will stoke it back up - results in Jan and how much money is spent in the window.

What he was doing late on showed what I said when Dyer left - Zog could do a job in the middle of midfield imo.

I suppose this is just the way I see things but I think the negativity cost us. I have no problem saying the increased effort was great to see but I also think what defines Sam's view was on show as well - as I said there was a spell in the second half when we were so far on top it was embarrassing but there then seemed to be a visible "woah we're going too fast" moment followed by a throttle back. I'd also say that being brutally honest Chelsea were poor which contributed to the opportunity. As Wacky said its the next game which will now be more interesting.

Unlucky but that just amplifies the lost points against the lesser teams. Cue one of his "big teams get the decisions" rants - fair enough but I still think he should have put Emre on for Smith and had Viduka and Owen on earlier - we were on top and he visibly settled for one point - well we only got one less than he aimed for.

Yep one canny performance obliterates the rest obviously. (I hope it continues)

On top with a chance of winning so the 4th centre half comes on then Owen for Martins. Bottleless bastard.

Scrappy as fuck but just shows where Charlie should be.

He said that the 'focus' should be getting results against the smaller teams, ie. it's the most important thing. I agree. He also said that if Chelsea play to their very best, we could still play very well and lose. This is also true. As I said that's one angle - viewing it from mine it reduces the games against the good teams to token efforts. It also means that if you don't do the business against the lesser teams, you're screwed.

You poor deluded fool Jimbo

Midfield of Milner, Butt, Faye, Smith and Duff. So what the fuck do you do when they score after 15 minutes you idiot?

"Our focus has to be on the winnable games rather than putting all our focus on having to get a performance against the big boys" Contradicts that doesn't it?

It sums up whats wrong imo - I know it might be "true" but that doesn't make it acceptable - he should be asked what he is going to do to change it. How many years and what will it take before anyone expecting his teams to try and win should part with their money? If we don't get Chelsea size money then whats the best we can hope for - to be good enough for a nil-nil? Can he tell us up to which teams in the league he does expect something so we can plan our trips? (none this year by the looks of things) Leaving actual results aside I remember keegan getting slagged off for saying when we got promoted his next aim was the title - he might not have achieved it but fuck me whose attitude would you rather have? Cue "we have no right to expect anything" - bollocks we have the right to expect effort, commitment and hope - obviously too much for this twat.

So if he doesn't want/expect to win and the performance doesn't really matter, what the fuck is he bothering for? What the fuck are the fans who've paid £50 to watch it supposed to think? I honestly don't care how many games we win or lose from now on - I just want this bastard sacked.

When the Bellamy/Souness thing was going on I was pretty much behind Souness as I thought (and still think) that his side of the story made more sense. However the reason why the outcome (including Souness leaving) was inevitable was because Souness was a stubborn, bloody-minded twat (a quality I thought would make him succeed). The thing about people now having a go at Allardyce is that I see the same kind of bloody-mindedness in him ("I'm a top man" etc) which may result in him being more determined to see things out "his way" and for him to persevere with the things attracting the most criticism like Zoggy's position. I guess what I'm trying to say is that being a stubborn bastard can work for you or against you but you have to make sure you're right first - I don't think Allardyce is.

People made the fair point when Shepherd needed the PL clubs to vote to allow Roeder to be manager that "they would wouldn't they" as it meant no danger. Its the same for managers now backing Allardyce - known (and limited) entity.

Cacapa was probably correct if he was injured - when he did the same for Rozenhal I thought we're 2-1 down with 35 mins left and you've just wasted a substitution to prove a point you stupid twat. Another sign.

Despite me mentioning it in a couple of posts the key word for me isn't "entertainment" - its "competence". I'll be the first to admit that during the summer and pre-season when speaking to mates I said it was great to have someone competent in charge - thats the impression I got with his transfer dealings and the friendlies. Now however I believe I was fooled and he honestly doesn't know what he's doing - its not even this "playing people in the wrong position" thing for me - it goes deeper than that imo. As people have said the ultra-negativity is at the core and the simple lack of being able to see that for all else they may be we do have some decent footballers in the quad so why not let them play football instead to hoofball? The sad answer as has been said is that he can't adapt to better players or different expectations - he knows one way to play and regardless of whether it "works" or not I feel its completely wrong for NUFC.

Yes it does - they got a better manager who was right for them - we didn't. Sorry but I laughed at "People will suss them out" - that should be Allardyce's epithet. He means, people will find out 'how to stop them playing'. I know - I just find it ironic considering the end to last season Bolton had and our start - it seems to me people have sussed big Sam's "way".

Yes it does - they got a better manager who was right for them - we didn't. Sorry but I laughed at "People will suss them out" - that should be Allardyce's epithet.

"We were never going to get into Europe" Where do you think Man City will finish Fish? If the answer is top six (which I think is possible) can you explain why the task for NUFC is/was so much greater?

As long as he doesn't go for Bruce I think either losing to Stoke or a not very unlikely pointless January could see the pressure become too much. Cue Shearer as caretaker till the summer. (Not saying thats what I want but its feasible)

Is it any coincidence that all thost teams have new managers ???? Of course not, changing manager does nothing, does it ? Missed Bolton as well.

The thing is Bolton weren't consistently good - they had a couple of good seasons followed by average - not a sign of constant progress or a plan. I think overall they were no more at the level of a Souness/Roeder team with breaks one way or another depending on the year - say Roeder last year if Owen hadn't been injured and we'd finished 6th/7th (not that ludicrous an idea). This is why I was never inspired by his appointment . I always referred to Wimbledon of old as football murderers because their primary aim was to destroy football and get the 90 minutes over with as quickly as possible but with an effective edge - exactly as Bolton were with varying degrees of success. As has been said before the argument that better players to work with and/or more money would mean that effectiveness would be more consistent is proving worryingly elusive so far. I have also said in the past that I thought the idea that most Newcastle fans want "proper" football above all else was a myth - I always argued the way large sections of the ground bayed for the ball to be "twatted forward" on occasion proved that a winning form of long ball football would be popular. I think now that that view may have been a little harsh and there is a lot of the mythical knowledge among the fans that that kind of football is ineffective as any kind of long term plan in the modern game - another sign that Allardyce is the wrong man for us. Another point I'd make is that the basic mistakes he's made this season should have been apparent from analysis of his infamous data - a sign it useless unless you can read it?

So we have to stop good teams and now we also have to stop teams "who are fighting". Fuck off you incompetent, negative piece of shit.

Doctor Who was canny - I still don't like Tennant and won't watch the next series because of Tate but I quite enjoyed that. Thought it was quite "brave" to have people dying.