Torres 0 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 I see nothing immoral about it as long as he does his time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13921 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Whether he was l lead into that answer or not it's pretty clear to anyone what the papers will make of certain scenarios. If we keep Barton we are dirty, immoral and scummy but if we let him go the club on the receiving end will 'boldly rescue his career/try to save barton/ throw him a lifeline' or some old shite. That's exactly it, if we could sack him but keep hold of his registration that would help matters a lot - why should someone else get him on a free and us lose out? Some people are just drowning in hypocrisy! Click Here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 I see nothing immoral about it as long as he does his time. I hope that was a response to T-Keith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9382 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Maybe he's trying to become truly scouse by simply mimicking their own "morals". Crime's all right if you do your time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13921 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 I see nothing immoral about it as long as he does his time. I hope that was a response to T-Keith That makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Maybe he's trying to become truly scouse by simply mimicking their own "morals". Crime's all right if you do your time. Completely over your head ... againnnnnnnnnnnn! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9382 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 All right then torres me old mucker, lay your cards out plain and simple. What did you mean by your post. Enlighten this poor ill-educated fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zico martin 87 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 I see nothing immoral about it as long as he does his time. Part of me agrees there though. Is it Newcastle's job to punish players for breaking the law outside of a football match? Joey has been punished by the judicial system, and has served his time. Whether he's rehabilitated or not awaits to be seen and whether Newcastle feel he is a risk worth taking should be a business decision. Obviously there is a moral obligation in play here as well but why should Newcastle lose out in all this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Whether he was l lead into that answer or not it's pretty clear to anyone what the papers will make of certain scenarios. If we keep Barton we are dirty, immoral and scummy but if we let him go the club on the receiving end will 'boldly rescue his career/try to save barton/ throw him a lifeline' or some old shite. That's exactly it, if we could sack him but keep hold of his registration that would help matters a lot - why should someone else get him on a free and us lose out? Some people are just drowning in hypocrisy! Click Here Was it Keane that got done for assault whilst walking his dog? Or did he get off? All right then torres me old mucker, lay your cards out plain and simple. What did you mean by your post. Enlighten this poor ill-educated fool. Maybe he's come around to the point of view that scally-bashing is for the greater good of society, like culling grey squirrels, and negative sexual selection with fake tan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13921 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Whether he was l lead into that answer or not it's pretty clear to anyone what the papers will make of certain scenarios. If we keep Barton we are dirty, immoral and scummy but if we let him go the club on the receiving end will 'boldly rescue his career/try to save barton/ throw him a lifeline' or some old shite. That's exactly it, if we could sack him but keep hold of his registration that would help matters a lot - why should someone else get him on a free and us lose out? Some people are just drowning in hypocrisy! Click Here Was it Keane that got done for assault whilst walking his dog? Or did he get off? I was thinking of certain allegations and other lawful devices that could be used against another club that we can't mention for legal reasons. The red tops might have something if you google but don't post it here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 All right then torres me old mucker, lay your cards out plain and simple. What did you mean by your post. Enlighten this poor ill-educated fool. This is probably a waste of time but here goes: It is my opinion that Newcastle would not be doing something immoral in rehiring Mr Barton as long as he serves his time and pays for what he did. I in no way condoned or excused his behaviour despite your rather petulant attempt to imply otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9382 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 My petulant attempt, or my tongue in cheek attempt? You decide on that and get back to me, oh wise and wondrous one.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 My petulant attempt, or my tongue in cheek attempt? You decide on that and get back to me, oh wise and wondrous one.... I`ve gone for petulant ... it is more in keeping with your nature. 'Tongue in cheek' would indicate that you were being witty ... which is not in keeping with your nature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9382 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Oho ho ho. The scouse wit is alive and well in you son. Now apologise for being a pissy little girl and we can all live happily ever after. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wavey Davey 0 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Mackems in 'high horse' shocker: Ooh! Hark at them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Mediawatch.... The Toon are currently running a competition on their website, offering schools a chance to 'Win a Newcastle player for the day'. 'Fancy a Newcastle United player dropping in to raise the profile of your school, charity or community group?' boasts the site. And what better way to raise the profile of your institution than having a footballer beat seven shades of s**te out of a defenceless child? Or, even better, holding one down while his feral cousin does the same. What are they referring too? I know Barton kicked off with a kid in Spain or somewhere, but he didn't hit the bairn did he? Or hold him down for his cousin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13921 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 The lad on the wind up was 16 in Liverpool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Mediawatch.... The Toon are currently running a competition on their website, offering schools a chance to 'Win a Newcastle player for the day'. 'Fancy a Newcastle United player dropping in to raise the profile of your school, charity or community group?' boasts the site. And what better way to raise the profile of your institution than having a footballer beat seven shades of s**te out of a defenceless child? Or, even better, holding one down while his feral cousin does the same. What are they referring too? I know Barton kicked off with a kid in Spain or somewhere, but he didn't hit the bairn did he? Or hold him down for his cousin? Since when did that get in the way of a good yarn? The cousin one is always good for a wheeze though, especially given they hardly know each other. Plus I always like the media's hypocrisy on the one hand the death sentence is never good enough, but on the other rehabilitation is the sacred cow. In fairness I'd hope a lot of Barton's community service is in fact working with kids, like Cantona's was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 The lad on the wind up was 16 in Liverpool. 16 year ad and out at 5.30AM? Hardly a nipper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 The lad on the wind up was 16 in Liverpool. 16 year ad and out at 5.30AM? Hardly a nipper. What? He's clearly an Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13921 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 The lad on the wind up was 16 in Liverpool. 16 year ad and out at 5.30AM? Hardly a nipper. When I was 16 I knew very well not to go on the wind up when out on the town, let alone go on the wind up towards somebody like Barton! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 The lad on the wind up was 16 in Liverpool. 16 year ad and out at 5.30AM? Hardly a nipper. When I was 16 I knew very well not to go on the wind up when out on the town, let alone go on the wind up towards somebody like Barton! Barton should have got a medal for teaching the scamp a lesson. What has society come to when adults can't give kids a clip around the ear and send them home chastened for causing trouble on the streets in the middle of the night. It's like that bloke who got arrested for kidnapping when he made a citizens arrest last week. Political correctness gone mad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13921 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 The lad on the wind up was 16 in Liverpool. 16 year ad and out at 5.30AM? Hardly a nipper. When I was 16 I knew very well not to go on the wind up when out on the town, let alone go on the wind up towards somebody like Barton! Barton should have got a medal for teaching the scamp a lesson. What has society come to when adults can't give kids a clip around the ear and send them home chastened for causing trouble on the streets in the middle of the night. It's like that bloke who got arrested for kidnapping when he made a citizens arrest last week. Political correctness gone mad. Link Barton was in the wrong and deserves what he gets but it's not like that lad was innocently walking down the street. It's clear he antagonized Barton and he probably knew exactly what he was going to be on the receiving end of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 The lad on the wind up was 16 in Liverpool. 16 year ad and out at 5.30AM? Hardly a nipper. When I was 16 I knew very well not to go on the wind up when out on the town, let alone go on the wind up towards somebody like Barton! See this is the problem with longer McD's opening hours, children wired to the hilt binge eating quaterpounders with bacon and excessive salt on their fries, hospital intakes of straw wrapper related injuries up 1000%, 11-11 opening is the only way, otherwise it's only a matter of time before we see an apple pie related death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 The lad on the wind up was 16 in Liverpool. 16 year ad and out at 5.30AM? Hardly a nipper. When I was 16 I knew very well not to go on the wind up when out on the town, let alone go on the wind up towards somebody like Barton! Barton should have got a medal for teaching the scamp a lesson. What has society come to when adults can't give kids a clip around the ear and send them home chastened for causing trouble on the streets in the middle of the night. It's like that bloke who got arrested for kidnapping when he made a citizens arrest last week. Political correctness gone mad. Link Barton was in the wrong and deserves what he gets but it's not like that lad was innocently walking down the street. It's clear he antagonized Barton and he probably knew exactly what he was going to be on the receiving end of. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/218...f-hooligan.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now