sandman02uk 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 http://www.sunderlandecho.com/safc/8037-sa...nish.4337890.jp I love the spelling And that reflects a mood of optimism abmong Sunderland fans bouyed by the signings of Pascal Chimbonda, Temmu Tainio and El Hadji Diouf. they where obviously so excited by this "landslide" that they forgot how to spell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Besty 4 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 http://www.sunderlandecho.com/safc/8037-sa...nish.4337890.jp I love the spelling And that reflects a mood of optimism abmong Sunderland fans bouyed by the signings of Pascal Chimbonda, Temmu Tainio and El Hadji Diouf. they where obviously so excited by this "landslide" that they forgot how to spell Temmu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teed 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 success... the 60`s lads,thats the last time you tasted success,though we are no better,nothing since 73. A cup win now and then`s very nice,a little bonus,the left overs of club football. The league title,Champions of the English game,now thats success! and as far as I`m aware,the historical standings of both clubs,read as follows. Sunderland = 6 titles. Newcastle = 4 titles. No If`s no buts just facts,I rest my case... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 success... the 60`s lads,thats the last time you tasted success,though we are no better,nothing since 73.A cup win now and then`s very nice,a little bonus,the left overs of club football. The league title,Champions of the English game,now thats success! and as far as I`m aware,the historical standings of both clubs,read as follows. Sunderland = 6 titles. Newcastle = 4 titles. No If`s no buts just facts,I rest my case... That's pretty narrow criteria. Suits your argument though, unsurprisingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 I presume teed is short for tedious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13004 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Funnily enough, in recent years, their criteria for success seems to be finishing above us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teed 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 success... the 60`s lads,thats the last time you tasted success,though we are no better,nothing since 73.A cup win now and then`s very nice,a little bonus,the left overs of club football. The league title,Champions of the English game,now thats success! and as far as I`m aware,the historical standings of both clubs,read as follows. Sunderland = 6 titles. Newcastle = 4 titles. No If`s no buts just facts,I rest my case... That's pretty narrow criteria. Suits your argument though, unsurprisingly. Just a fact,neither club can claim success in recent history,and both sets of fans should be embarrassed by the lack of it so for Mags to cry and wimper,because of a little banter or gloating,as they might see it,does ring a tad hollow considering the the none stop barrage,Sunderland fans have endured in recent times. If you give it,learn how to take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 success... the 60`s lads,thats the last time you tasted success,though we are no better,nothing since 73.A cup win now and then`s very nice,a little bonus,the left overs of club football. The league title,Champions of the English game,now thats success! and as far as I`m aware,the historical standings of both clubs,read as follows. Sunderland = 6 titles. Newcastle = 4 titles. No If`s no buts just facts,I rest my case... That's pretty narrow criteria. Suits your argument though, unsurprisingly. Just a fact,neither club can claim success in recent history,and both sets of fans should be embarrassed by the lack of it so for Mags to cry and wimper,because of a little banter or gloating,as they might see it,does ring a tad hollow considering the the none stop barrage,Sunderland fans have endured in recent times. If you give it,learn how to take it. Aye, it is a fact you've won the league more times than us. It's also true that's not the only way to define success. Who's whimpering and crying by the way? I think everyone's laughing at the somewhat misplaced optimism. If you want a boring "who's the most successful" argument I'm quite confident I've got more ammo. Alternatively, hang around for a bit of banter. You seem alright tbf and I'm not one of those sad bastards (both sides have them) who thinks hating all the other lot's supporters makes them the bestest fan in the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 We have a loud mong minority who think we're better than we are, they have a loud mong minority who concentrate more on what we're doing than their own club. It would be the best thing for everyone if we chucked them all in a big room together with weapons and let them sort it out amongst themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teed 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 success... the 60`s lads,thats the last time you tasted success,though we are no better,nothing since 73.A cup win now and then`s very nice,a little bonus,the left overs of club football. The league title,Champions of the English game,now thats success! and as far as I`m aware,the historical standings of both clubs,read as follows. Sunderland = 6 titles. Newcastle = 4 titles. No If`s no buts just facts,I rest my case... That's pretty narrow criteria. Suits your argument though, unsurprisingly. Just a fact,neither club can claim success in recent history,and both sets of fans should be embarrassed by the lack of it so for Mags to cry and wimper,because of a little banter or gloating,as they might see it,does ring a tad hollow considering the the none stop barrage,Sunderland fans have endured in recent times. If you give it,learn how to take it. Aye, it is a fact you've won the league more times than us. It's also true that's not the only way to define success. Who's whimpering and crying by the way? I think everyone's laughing at the somewhat misplaced optimism. If you want a boring "who's the most successful" argument I'm quite confident I've got more ammo. Alternatively, hang around for a bit of banter. You seem alright tbf and I'm not one of those sad bastards (both sides have them) who thinks hating all the other lot's supporters makes them the bestest fan in the world. I`ve been a member of this board for a couple of years mate,dont post a lot,but pop on from time to time to read the craic,like yourself im not an oppo hater,I like the banter,it brightens up the days,got no time for the knuckle draggers tbo.no nead to drag the debate out marra,it`s pointless im sure you`ll agree.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 9351 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 success... the 60`s lads,thats the last time you tasted success,though we are no better,nothing since 73.A cup win now and then`s very nice,a little bonus,the left overs of club football. The league title,Champions of the English game,now thats success! and as far as I`m aware,the historical standings of both clubs,read as follows. Sunderland = 6 titles. Newcastle = 4 titles. No If`s no buts just facts,I rest my case... That's pretty narrow criteria. Suits your argument though, unsurprisingly. Just a fact,neither club can claim success in recent history,and both sets of fans should be embarrassed by the lack of it so for Mags to cry and wimper,because of a little banter or gloating,as they might see it,does ring a tad hollow considering the the none stop barrage,Sunderland fans have endured in recent times. If you give it,learn how to take it. Aye, it is a fact you've won the league more times than us. It's also true that's not the only way to define success. Who's whimpering and crying by the way? I think everyone's laughing at the somewhat misplaced optimism. If you want a boring "who's the most successful" argument I'm quite confident I've got more ammo. Alternatively, hang around for a bit of banter. You seem alright tbf and I'm not one of those sad bastards (both sides have them) who thinks hating all the other lot's supporters makes them the bestest fan in the world. Well that's you out of the "Officially Authenticated by Stevie" fan club, then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 success... the 60`s lads,thats the last time you tasted success,though we are no better,nothing since 73.A cup win now and then`s very nice,a little bonus,the left overs of club football. The league title,Champions of the English game,now thats success! and as far as I`m aware,the historical standings of both clubs,read as follows. Sunderland = 6 titles. Newcastle = 4 titles. No If`s no buts just facts,I rest my case... That's pretty narrow criteria. Suits your argument though, unsurprisingly. Just a fact,neither club can claim success in recent history,and both sets of fans should be embarrassed by the lack of it so for Mags to cry and wimper,because of a little banter or gloating,as they might see it,does ring a tad hollow considering the the none stop barrage,Sunderland fans have endured in recent times. If you give it,learn how to take it. Aye, it is a fact you've won the league more times than us. It's also true that's not the only way to define success. Who's whimpering and crying by the way? I think everyone's laughing at the somewhat misplaced optimism. If you want a boring "who's the most successful" argument I'm quite confident I've got more ammo. Alternatively, hang around for a bit of banter. You seem alright tbf and I'm not one of those sad bastards (both sides have them) who thinks hating all the other lot's supporters makes them the bestest fan in the world. I`ve been a member of this board for a couple of years mate,dont post a lot,but pop on from time to time to read the craic,like yourself im not an oppo hater,I like the banter,it brightens up the days,got no time for the knuckle draggers tbo.no nead to drag the debate out marra,it`s pointless im sure you`ll agree.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teed 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Just read that S\land and Mags go toe to toe for Anton Ferdinand!! now this is one match i hope you win.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Besty 4 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 He's already said he's not leaving West Ham hasn't he? Hope so anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 He's already said he's not leaving West Ham hasn't he? Hope so anyway... The papers reported he rejected us only for Curbishley to come out and say no approach had been made for him iirc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teed 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 He's already said he's not leaving West Ham hasn't he? Hope so anyway... Hope your right,very poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wavey Davey 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Author Share Posted July 30, 2008 (edited) If this be the case, then I'm guessing the Collicini thing's not going too well. Oh and I noticed that Sun'lun are in for Balde. Edited July 30, 2008 by Zebra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 It's gone from Dawson (early summer) to Anton to Colucinni and back to Anton with a hint of Senderos. None of whom fill me with great confidence. Colucinni the pick of that lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wavey Davey 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Author Share Posted July 30, 2008 It's gone from Dawson (early summer) to Anton to Colucinni and back to Anton with a hint of Senderos. None of whom fill me with great confidence. Colucinni the pick of that lot. The Colucinni saga has gathered a fair amount of pace. Not just half-hearted speculation, mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 It's gone from Dawson (early summer) to Anton to Colucinni and back to Anton with a hint of Senderos. None of whom fill me with great confidence. Colucinni the pick of that lot. The Colucinni saga has gathered a fair amount of pace. Not just half-hearted speculation, mind. I am aware it is the nature of the market these days and there will be haggling over some of the deals, but even with Spiderman I believe we still don't have the registration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 (edited) success... the 60`s lads,thats the last time you tasted success,though we are no better,nothing since 73.A cup win now and then`s very nice,a little bonus,the left overs of club football. The league title,Champions of the English game,now thats success! and as far as I`m aware,the historical standings of both clubs,read as follows. Sunderland = 6 titles. Newcastle = 4 titles. No If`s no buts just facts,I rest my case... That's pretty narrow criteria. Suits your argument though, unsurprisingly. Just a fact,neither club can claim success in recent history,and both sets of fans should be embarrassed by the lack of it so for Mags to cry and wimper,because of a little banter or gloating,as they might see it,does ring a tad hollow considering the the none stop barrage,Sunderland fans have endured in recent times. If you give it,learn how to take it. Neither have been (although we've been close - if you're just narrowly defining "success" as "winning a cup/title"), but after the sheer hysteria of the early Reid and the Premiership years, it takes an awful lot of botox to call NUFC deluded with a straight face. Edited July 30, 2008 by Fop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 It's gone from Dawson (early summer) to Anton to Colucinni and back to Anton with a hint of Senderos. None of whom fill me with great confidence. Colucinni the pick of that lot. The Colucinni saga has gathered a fair amount of pace. Not just half-hearted speculation, mind. I am aware it is the nature of the market these days and there will be haggling over some of the deals, but even with Spiderman I believe we still don't have the registration. 50p 5p 50p 5p 50p 5p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 It's gone from Dawson (early summer) to Anton to Colucinni and back to Anton with a hint of Senderos. None of whom fill me with great confidence. Colucinni the pick of that lot. The Colucinni saga has gathered a fair amount of pace. Not just half-hearted speculation, mind. I am aware it is the nature of the market these days and there will be haggling over some of the deals, but even with Spiderman I believe we still don't have the registration. 50p 5p 50p 5p 50p 5p 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Stop shitting yourself, it'll be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 (edited) Stop shitting yourself, it'll be fine. I'm intersted in signing a creative playmaker all this other stuff bores me tbh. Edited July 30, 2008 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now