Douggy B 0 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 How are we all feeling about this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...ming-march.html There are plenty of threads about freedom of speech on here but nothing about those that abuse that right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 How are we all feeling about this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...ming-march.html There are plenty of threads about freedom of speech on here but nothing about those that abuse that right. Can you spell out why it is abusing a right? The banners as stated in the article would be distasteful imo, but that is about it. If you have freedom of speech (and demonstration) it has to apply to all to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 11, 2009 Author Share Posted March 11, 2009 How are we all feeling about this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...ming-march.html There are plenty of threads about freedom of speech on here but nothing about those that abuse that right. Can you spell out why it is abusing a right? The banners as stated in the article would be distasteful imo, but that is about it. If you have freedom of speech (and demonstration) it has to apply to all to work. I think calling people butchers and r@pists who are just doing their jobs maybe considered as abusing that right, wouldn't you? If I was holding up a placard saying something equally abusive and untrue about someone else I would be, quite rightly, charged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 I'm not exactly pro-war but I guess these folk have a right to voice their opinions, having said that there is a part of me that would like to see them parachuted into the heart of Afganistan and see how Islamic they feel then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 How are we all feeling about this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...ming-march.html There are plenty of threads about freedom of speech on here but nothing about those that abuse that right. Can you spell out why it is abusing a right? The banners as stated in the article would be distasteful imo, but that is about it. If you have freedom of speech (and demonstration) it has to apply to all to work. I think calling people butchers and r@pists who are just doing their jobs maybe considered as abusing that right, wouldn't you? If I was holding up a placard saying something equally abusive and untrue about someone else I would be, quite rightly, charged. There is a long anti-war tradition (demonstrations) in England, it just so happens these are brown men protesting against white men. As I said the banners were distasteful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 I'm not exactly pro-war but I guess these folk have a right to voice their opinions, having said that there is a part of me that would like to see them parachuted into the heart of Afganistan and see how Islamic they feel then. Maybe the Saudi's should cut off our oil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 7072 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 How are we all feeling about this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...ming-march.html There are plenty of threads about freedom of speech on here but nothing about those that abuse that right. Can you spell out why it is abusing a right? The banners as stated in the article would be distasteful imo, but that is about it. If you have freedom of speech (and demonstration) it has to apply to all to work. I think calling people butchers and r@pists who are just doing their jobs maybe considered as abusing that right, wouldn't you? If I was holding up a placard saying something equally abusive and untrue about someone else I would be, quite rightly, charged. There is a long anti-war tradition (demonstrations) in England, it just so happens these are brown men protesting against white men. As I said the banners were distasteful. They were a tad more than distastefull IMO, if it'd been the other way around, or even football fans for that matter, there'd have been dogs in and baton charges. Bet I wouldn't have been protected from "the mob" if I'd held up an "Allah is Satan" banner, I'd have been carted off and charged with one of the many loony-lefty laws this country now has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 How are we all feeling about this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...ming-march.html There are plenty of threads about freedom of speech on here but nothing about those that abuse that right. Can you spell out why it is abusing a right? The banners as stated in the article would be distasteful imo, but that is about it. If you have freedom of speech (and demonstration) it has to apply to all to work. I think calling people butchers and r@pists who are just doing their jobs maybe considered as abusing that right, wouldn't you? If I was holding up a placard saying something equally abusive and untrue about someone else I would be, quite rightly, charged. There is a long anti-war tradition (demonstrations) in England, it just so happens these are brown men protesting against white men. As I said the banners were distasteful. They were a tad more than distastefull IMO, if it'd been the other way around, or even football fans for that matter, there'd have been dogs in and baton charges. Bet I wouldn't have been protected from "the mob" if I'd held up an "Allah is Satan" banner, I'd have been carted off and charged with one of the many loony-lefty laws this country now has. I would defend your right to hold up such a banner. FWIW they are demonstrating against the wrong troops, British troops are much better in urban warfare etc... It's the Americans who caused nearly all the civilian casualties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26806 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 I saw one of them being grilled on GMTV this morning by her with the big knockers. Not sure which of them made themselves look the bigger fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 The video is interesting there is a young Muslim lad at the end condemning the banners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 11, 2009 Author Share Posted March 11, 2009 Most sensible people would. We are not trying to tar people with the same brush but those responsible need to be bought to book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Most sensible people would. We are not trying to tar people with the same brush but those responsible need to be bought to book. Israel needs to be bought to book, but who's gonna do it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13915 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 These lads are just doing their job and shouldn't really be abused for it. Any soldiers committing genuine offences will be court marshalled and punished accordingly and probably in some cases - very harshly. My friend has been to Iraq twice and he works in logistics, delivering supplies as part of an army convoy etc etc. He has probably never fired his weapon and I doubt he has even had cause to pick it up, yet these people would have him down as a murdering rapist? Right Oh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 11, 2009 Author Share Posted March 11, 2009 Most sensible people would. We are not trying to tar people with the same brush but those responsible need to be bought to book. Israel needs to be bought to book, but who's gonna do it? You're ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Most sensible people would. We are not trying to tar people with the same brush but those responsible need to be bought to book. Israel needs to be bought to book, but who's gonna do it? You're ridiculous. Netted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 11, 2009 Author Share Posted March 11, 2009 Most sensible people would. We are not trying to tar people with the same brush but those responsible need to be bought to book. Israel needs to be bought to book, but who's gonna do it? You're ridiculous. Netted. Typical lefty, runs out of any kind of sensible argument and attempts to fall back on "humour" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Most sensible people would. We are not trying to tar people with the same brush but those responsible need to be bought to book. Israel needs to be bought to book, but who's gonna do it? You're ridiculous. Netted. Typical lefty, runs out of any kind of sensible argument and attempts to fall back on "humour" Lefty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 11, 2009 Author Share Posted March 11, 2009 Most sensible people would. We are not trying to tar people with the same brush but those responsible need to be bought to book. Israel needs to be bought to book, but who's gonna do it? You're ridiculous. Netted. Typical lefty, runs out of any kind of sensible argument and attempts to fall back on "humour" Lefty? Netted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia 0 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 (edited) I'm anti-war but I think those involved in the protests are daft cunts. You've got to recognise their right to protest but the squaddies weren't the ones who orchestrated the war on a lie. I'd have no qualms if they stood outside Tony Blair's house with their signs and banners but the soldiers? That's just daft. Edited March 11, 2009 by Ketsbaia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 I'm anti-war but I think those involved in the protests are daft cunts. You've got to recognise their right to protest but the squaddies weren't the ones who orchestrated the war on a lie. I'd have no qualms if they stood outside Tony Blair's house with their signs and banners but the soldiers? That's just daft. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia 0 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 How are we all feeling about this? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...ming-march.html There are plenty of threads about freedom of speech on here but nothing about those that abuse that right. Can you spell out why it is abusing a right? The banners as stated in the article would be distasteful imo, but that is about it. If you have freedom of speech (and demonstration) it has to apply to all to work. I think calling people butchers and r@pists who are just doing their jobs maybe considered as abusing that right, wouldn't you? If I was holding up a placard saying something equally abusive and untrue about someone else I would be, quite rightly, charged. There is a long anti-war tradition (demonstrations) in England, it just so happens these are brown men protesting against white men. As I said the banners were distasteful. They were a tad more than distastefull IMO, if it'd been the other way around, or even football fans for that matter, there'd have been dogs in and baton charges. Bet I wouldn't have been protected from "the mob" if I'd held up an "Allah is Satan" banner, I'd have been carted off and charged with one of the many loony-lefty laws this country now has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 I'm anti-war but I think those involved in the protests are daft cunts. You've got to recognise their right to protest but the squaddies weren't the ones who orchestrated the war on a lie. I'd have no qualms if they stood outside Tony Blair's house with their signs and banners but the soldiers? That's just daft. Spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 (edited) Disgrace, the scurge of this island. I was listening to this total cunt on Talksport today representing the International ISLAMIC Front, saying we are a corrupt country and he's ashamed there's no sharia law here and ashamed to be born here, and we are a dictatorship, Parry basically said fuck off somewhere else you cunt then and take the rest of the people like you with you, first time I've stood and applauded a bloke on the radio. Edited March 11, 2009 by Stevie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia 0 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 I just have this vision of Stevie applauding his fucking radio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Disgrace, the scurge of this island. I was listening to this total cunt on Talksport today representing the International ISLAMIC Front, saying we are a corrupt country and he's ashamed there's no sharia law here and ashamed to be born here, and we are a dictatorship, Parry basically said fuck off somewhere else you cunt then and take the rest of the people like you with you, first time I've stood and applauded a bloke on the radio. Good luck to him on finding a country with Sharia law that isn't corrupt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now