Jump to content

Chilean Miners


Gemmill
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sky News have got a "Miners Rescued" counter in the top left hand corner of the screen. :angry: They've got a fucking psychologist in the studio watching one of the miners doing a press conference with his family, and he's analysing the body language claiming that the man's wife and children don't look happy and it's because the miner is giving attention to the press and not them. Basically claiming that this is a family unit in breakdown and that there are troubled times ahead for them ffs.

 

Fair play to them for getting the miners out. Can't help thinking they've let it go to their heads though, coming out the hole in fucking sunglasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sky News have got a "Miners Rescued" counter in the top left hand corner of the screen. :angry: They've got a fucking psychologist in the studio watching one of the miners doing a press conference with his family, and he's analysing the body language claiming that the man's wife and children don't look happy and it's because the miner is giving attention to the press and not them. Basically claiming that this is a family unit in breakdown and that there are troubled times ahead for them ffs.

 

Fair play to them for getting the miners out. Can't help thinking they've let it go to their heads though, coming out the hole in fucking sunglasses.

 

I know it's the middle of the night down there but I read somewhere that they're going to have to wear them while they get used to natural light once more.

 

BTW - what was it they were mining?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sky News have got a "Miners Rescued" counter in the top left hand corner of the screen. :angry: They've got a fucking psychologist in the studio watching one of the miners doing a press conference with his family, and he's analysing the body language claiming that the man's wife and children don't look happy and it's because the miner is giving attention to the press and not them. Basically claiming that this is a family unit in breakdown and that there are troubled times ahead for them ffs.

 

Fair play to them for getting the miners out. Can't help thinking they've let it go to their heads though, coming out the hole in fucking sunglasses.

 

I know it's the middle of the night down there but I read somewhere that they're going to have to wear them while they get used to natural light once more.

 

BTW - what was it they were mining?

Get away man, they all think they're Bono.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Craig hasnt posted in a while but still helps with admin duties.

 

Shackbeep has been here a while now and seems canny enough to be fair.

 

He's in no cliques like which may be a problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How ironic on her 85th birthday, Thatcher is knocked off the front pages by a bunch of miners...

 

:lol:

 

I read on Twitter earlier:

 

Scousers and miners celebrating on SKY News, is Thatcher dead ?

 

:angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was it Nixon-Kissinger’s Fault?

 

The corporate mass media (especially television) did not treat the Chilean mine collapse as a labor story but rather as a feel-good human interest story. It not only avoided asking hard questions about why the near-disaster occurred and why the mine workers could be treated like guinea pigs by their employers, it actively obscured these questions. I saw a psychobabbling guest of Tony Harris on CNN actually talking about how the Chilean government is the father figure for the miners and their supporters and people are turning to it for succor and inspiration. I threw up a little in my mouth.

 

So here are the questions that a social historian would ask about the sorry episode, and which I never heard anyone on television news ask during all the wall to wall coverage:

 

1. What were the miners mining? (A.: Gold and copper).

 

2. Did the high price of gold and the fact that the mining company was close to bankruptcy cause the company executives to cut corners?

 

3. Are the mine owners guilty of criminal negligence?

 

4. Why did the San Estaban mining company reopen the mine so quickly after an earlier tunnel collapse severed the leg of a mine worker?

 

5. Why is there no accountability for the mine owners?

 

6. Is George W. Bush-style deregulation of the mining industry by the Chilean government part of the problem here?

 

7. What is the influence of big gold and copper corporations over US policy?

 

8. Are copper and gold mine owners stronger in relation to workers and have they escaped government regulation because the US engineered a coup in 1973 to destroy the Chilean Left?

 

9. Was the San Estaban mining company’s ability to marginalize the union and to disregard input from the workers rooted in American-imposed corporate privilege?

 

10. In other words, was the trapping of these workers in the first place Richard Nixon’s and Henry Kissinger’s fault?

 

http://www.juancole.com/2010/10/top-ten-qu...gers-fault.html

 

Before you say anything Leazes, i know you believe asking the questions means he's anti-American/anti-west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.