Jump to content

The Run-In


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, PaddockLad said:

IMG_7335.jpeg

 

quite comfortably the most concise, self explanatory graphic I've ever seen posted on here.

well done pl, if only the desperately needy with their unnecessarily convoluted, gaudy hyperbole could follow suit.

 

Edited by thebrokendoll
  • Haha 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

Did you and @thebrokendollmake this? 

 

It looks like when they gave spiders LSD and observed them making webs. 


It’s a flow chart. I remember doing them at school. I also suggested about two months ago that we’d get champions league if we won our home games. I haven’t contributed much to this thread because I knew if we won our home games we’d get champions league. Tbh I posted it for the feeble minded who constantly needed to post about something that was arithmetally obvious not long after the cup final, just a bit of clarification for you :cuppa: 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/05/2025 at 18:01, Craig said:

The reality is each of the 5 teams HAVE to win on Sunday. 

 

Man City - have 2 games Bournemouth (H) & Fulham (A). Neither is straight forward. I'd much rather having points on the board than games in hand

Chelsea - have to go to Forest and win. Not straight forward.

Villa - have to go to Man Utd and win. Not straight forward.

Forest - have to beat Chelsea and hope Villa don't win. Not straight forward.

Newcastle - have to beat Everton at home. Surely the easier ask of any of the 5 teams.

 

 

thanks to last night i think 4 teams need to win and city need to draw. 

 

whether that helps city or not time will tell

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LondonBlue said:

 

 

thanks to last night i think 4 teams need to win and city need to draw. 

 

whether that helps city or not time will tell

 

 

 

who have you got - fulham away? can't see you losing there 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LondonBlue said:

 

 

thanks to last night i think 4 teams need to win and city need to draw. 

 

whether that helps city or not time will tell

 

 


A point is surely enough for you. It leaves a possibility of Man City, Newcastle, Chelsea & Villa all ending on 69 points, but Villa would need to win by 18 goals! Not even Man Utd are that shit! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, thebrokendoll said:

oy @Gemmill,

look at this for a chart, eat your fucking heart out and weep.....

 

742731808_Screenshot_20250521_113820_SamsungInternet.thumb.jpg.284aa2e20ad60adec42a625418bb518c.jpg

 

Can you explain the Chelsea/Forest column please? When it says W and L who's winning and who's losing, cos they can't both do it. 

 

I MEAN FOR FUCKS SAKE. 

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

Can you explain the Chelsea/Forest column please? When it says W and L who's winning and who's losing, cos they can't both do it. 

 

I MEAN FOR FUCKS SAKE. 

 

Careful TBD this fuckers on the verge of getting his lass' red marker pen out.

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

Can you explain the Chelsea/Forest column please? When it says W and L who's winning and who's losing, cos they can't both do it. 

 

I MEAN FOR FUCKS SAKE. 

 

simpleton.

the outcome would apply to either team, being as they play each other.

being embarrassingly pernickety doesn't make you look clever, just a cunt.

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

 

Careful TBD this fuckers on the verge of getting his lass' red marker pen out.


Euphemism? 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, thebrokendoll said:

 

simpleton.

the outcome would apply to either team, being as they play each other.

being embarrassingly pernickety doesn't make you look clever, just a cunt.

 

Poor presentation. Very poor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only are we completing data/probability visualisation pieces of Newcastle's chances, but now also a critical review of said data presentation methodologies. I've seen less scrutiny in academic journals :lol: Remember to call out your innate bias and areas in which further research could be done lads.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.