Guest alex Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 The last paragraph barely makes sense tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 6867 Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 The last paragraph barely makes sense tbh. 195518[/snapback] tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 The last paragraph barely makes sense tbh. 195518[/snapback] don't know what you're on about mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 The last paragraph barely makes sense tbh. 195518[/snapback] don't know what you're on about mate 195524[/snapback] Neither did I, in the last paragraph of your previous post in this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Having said that (going back to the original post in the thread), the knives are out after a poor closing 10 minutes of a 90 minute match. So it goes to show that the fans can be influenced by the final stages rather than the overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Having said that (going back to the original post in the thread), the knives are out after a poor closing 10 minutes of a 90 minute match. So it goes to show that the fans can be influenced by the final stages rather than the overall. 196071[/snapback] That wasnt a poor closing 10 minutes though it was a fairly dreadful 80 minutes followed by a piss bastard poor last 10 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34547 Posted September 9, 2006 Author Share Posted September 9, 2006 Having said that (going back to the original post in the thread), the knives are out after a poor closing 10 minutes of a 90 minute match. So it goes to show that the fans can be influenced by the final stages rather than the overall. 196071[/snapback] The whole match was shit man. We looked pretty much clueless all game. The positivity in the face of all evidence to the contrary thing isn't working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highpants 0 Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Having said that (going back to the original post in the thread), the knives are out after a poor closing 10 minutes of a 90 minute match. So it goes to show that the fans can be influenced by the final stages rather than the overall. 196071[/snapback] The whole match was shit man. We looked pretty much clueless all game. The positivity in the face of all evidence to the contrary thing isn't working. 196085[/snapback] 100 % correct, can anyone who saw the game seriousley expect anything in the next 4 games, i cant, we dont play as a team, we can blame fat boy as much as we like, but he provides or doesnt provide funds end of, oh yeh and he selects the manager. The blame for our performances are down to Roeder, as individuals we have some good players, they dont perform together on the pitch, lets be honest our recent performances in Europe were fucking crap when you take into account the opposition. Weve got to stop dreaming of getting top players in, it wont happen even if fatso comes up with the funds, who will want to come here, people on here go on about Klose, youd have to shoot him and drag his body here. Roeder cant manage this team or any other in my opinion. Fulham today were shite yet they turned us over, says it all. And on the subject of players coming here lets not forget that Owen DID say he came here for the money, not for footballing reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Having said that (going back to the original post in the thread), the knives are out after a poor closing 10 minutes of a 90 minute match. So it goes to show that the fans can be influenced by the final stages rather than the overall. 196071[/snapback] The whole match was shit man. We looked pretty much clueless all game. The positivity in the face of all evidence to the contrary thing isn't working. 196085[/snapback] If the match had finished after 80 minutes, we'd have been praising the contributions of the midfield, saying that the defence had done pretty well, and preaching patience over the front two. As it is, the defence blotted their copybook big-time in the last 10 minutes, and the overall feeling is entirely one of disappointment. I disagree that we looked clueless all game, there were a few very promising moves that hopefully bode well for the future once everyone has settled in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Playing the long ball game with Martins up front doesnt really make Roeder seem like a tactical genuis like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34547 Posted September 9, 2006 Author Share Posted September 9, 2006 Having said that (going back to the original post in the thread), the knives are out after a poor closing 10 minutes of a 90 minute match. So it goes to show that the fans can be influenced by the final stages rather than the overall. 196071[/snapback] The whole match was shit man. We looked pretty much clueless all game. The positivity in the face of all evidence to the contrary thing isn't working. 196085[/snapback] If the match had finished after 80 minutes, we'd have been praising the contributions of the midfield, saying that the defence had done pretty well, and preaching patience over the front two. As it is, the defence blotted their copybook big-time in the last 10 minutes, and the overall feeling is entirely one of disappointment. I disagree that we looked clueless all game, there were a few very promising moves that hopefully bode well for the future once everyone has settled in. 196102[/snapback] The game lasted 90 minutes though, and having not threatened us for the previous 80, Fulham all of a sudden decided to give it a go, and we completely folded. As I've said elsewhere, we were ok in midfield. Everywhere else we were poor though. The defence had nothing to do until Fulham decided to score two goals. There's little point in trying to be positive after today, I really don't know what point you're trying to make. The only positive was that the midfield did ok. Not much good when we lost a game we should have walked. Fulham are notoriously bad away from home, and yet we couldn't kill them off and ended up losing the game. We won't get much worse opposition coming to SJP this season. That's pretty worrying if you ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8872 Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Having said that (going back to the original post in the thread), the knives are out after a poor closing 10 minutes of a 90 minute match. So it goes to show that the fans can be influenced by the final stages rather than the overall. 196071[/snapback] The whole match was shit man. We looked pretty much clueless all game. The positivity in the face of all evidence to the contrary thing isn't working. 196085[/snapback] If the match had finished after 80 minutes, we'd have been praising the contributions of the midfield, saying that the defence had done pretty well, and preaching patience over the front two. As it is, the defence blotted their copybook big-time in the last 10 minutes, and the overall feeling is entirely one of disappointment. I disagree that we looked clueless all game, there were a few very promising moves that hopefully bode well for the future once everyone has settled in. Bollocks, if the match had finished after 80 minutes a lot would have said that we squeezed a lucky win, because the match had written 0-0 all over it. The contribution from the midfield by creating chances was very little, the defence looked very shaky the whole time and the front two looked totally lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missed Sticks 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Having said that (going back to the original post in the thread), the knives are out after a poor closing 10 minutes of a 90 minute match. So it goes to show that the fans can be influenced by the final stages rather than the overall. 196071[/snapback] The whole match was shit man. We looked pretty much clueless all game. The positivity in the face of all evidence to the contrary thing isn't working. 196085[/snapback] If the match had finished after 80 minutes, we'd have been praising the contributions of the midfield, saying that the defence had done pretty well, and preaching patience over the front two. As it is, the defence blotted their copybook big-time in the last 10 minutes, and the overall feeling is entirely one of disappointment. I disagree that we looked clueless all game, there were a few very promising moves that hopefully bode well for the future once everyone has settled in. Bollocks, if the match had finished after 80 minutes a lot would have said that we squeezed a lucky win, because the match had written 0-0 all over it. The contribution from the midfield by creating chances was very little, the defence looked very shaky the whole time and the front two looked totally lost. Well, don't worry, we'll soon have Canny Kieron back. It'll be like like a new sigining and will lift the whole squad, unquote blah blah blah.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 So, that's our problem is it? The game lasted the full 90 minutes instead of finishing 10 minutes early? Tbh, loads of people would have been happy were that the case but most fans attitude is were great if we win and shit if we lose. Anyone with a bit of a clue would have realised that a 1-0 win would have papered over the cracks of a poor performance against a Fulham side that was awful on the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 4883 Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 By the way, I was never insulted by the "Geordie women are slags" comment. Most are....apart from my mother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17815 Posted September 11, 2006 Share Posted September 11, 2006 By the way, I was never insulted by the "Geordie women are slags" comment. Most are....apart from my mother. I think it was "dogs" tbh. Which is patent bollocks really. Now slags...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now