adios

been wanting to see collo in that position for ages, no doubt going to be made look foolish today

aye, def good advice. the lad that gave it his seal of approval does this sort of thing for a living, and is very scientifically-minded, which is why I think it's prob a cut above a lot of stuff.

no, do tell. sounds dodgy. nah, it's legit according to a trainer I trust who's been using it. I won't use it as would interfere with other stuff I do, but basically he gets his meals between 10am and 10pm? or maybe it's 12pm and 8pm and then organises his weight training around that. anyway it's way less severe than I expected when I first read about it. can put you in touch with him if you fancy, gemmill.

It's gonna get a lot worse. aftershock armageddon

you're right that he loves it. not sure it's an age thing, more a personality disorder. good thing he's got no one to argue with!

The brilliant thing is he is such a poor example for the pro-war anti immigration civil liberty eroders he convinces more people to the lefty view than he does his poorly thought out, ill founded views. my word

I just couldn't relate to the storyline

red=good, 2 litres = I guess red is only good until you've just been raped with a jackhammer?

!!

there's a quote

How can he when the windows closed you tool. are you for real?

tonton zola mokouko

that's an awesome sentence, do you mind if I use it?

look, that was ONE girl, ONE time with a harassment suit, it does not reflect how much the rest of them love it, and she was just playing hard to get anyway. still, hope I wasn't being to obtuse with that point

I can see you haven't the first clue how much the nuke industry spend on pr and spin. Do you? Course you don't. as opposed to...?

which is why I don't judge

my scientific analysyis actually reveals completely the opposite! people who believed the scaremongering about nuclear energy in 2007: dickheads people who thought the fucktastic bubble of 2007 was stable and sustainable: dickheads someone do me up a pretty venn diagram please

why is it assumed that when the nuclear crowd weigh up the pros and cons they "believe what they're told," but when the anti-nuclear crowd do the same, it is in their considered opinion? considering that the nuclear option has long been the controversial one? I'm interested in your opinion of the cross over of opinion with the economy in 2007, because it seems like you must be looking at a very small cross section of opinion to reach that conclusion...

That assertion was discussed and dismissed. You can't be that special to build a website, and go for interviews via the dole. Last time I say it some people are just wronguns no other explanation is required. I will say I don't think that's close to what the medical community would say. I take pills to stay on the straight and narrow, and know people who do the same to prevent going into full jesus mode. Many of them high functioning and successful. I don't think Paul's going to be up for any business accolades, but the same kind of rules apply. as I said though, not one to judge, but if I was in a spot where I genuinely felt the lad was a danger I would discuss it privately, have words with the proper people and leave him be.

it takes someone like you to not see the hypocrisy of talking about the hysterical masses when you're being taken in by equally hysterical nonsense. the goths of the political spectrum tbh there's a reason people don't give you the time of day in a real debate

this lad seems a bit fucking special to be getting this kind of abuse, not that I'm one to judge

the only intelligent conclusion you can reach without severe emotional problems tbh. parky's craic worse than a crack in the core reactor

you have to refer to each person by their 6 digit hexadecimal colour code now, or be branded a fascist

and my avatar doesn't look like he's eating poo, thank you very much