manc-mag

In case anybody missed it the other day, this man was actually offered a fucking PAYRISE to stay with his employer!

But the female has already been fertilised so surely that would rule her out as an immediately viable recepticle 45148[/snapback] Thats true of course, but I still think theres something about the general notion of someone 'being fertile'-an indicator of health etc - that probably triggers something. And then theres always Alex's big tits theory. 45154[/snapback] Surely a pregnant women is less up for it as well 45158[/snapback] Jesus wept tbh We all know why it seems odd/reasons why it might appear strange to be attracted to pregnant women. I'm trying to offer theories as to why, mysteriously, some people are despite those glaringly obvious points!!! And anyway, I'm given to understand that some women are randy as owt during some stages of pregnancy.

But the female has already been fertilised so surely that would rule her out as an immediately viable recepticle 45148[/snapback] Thats true of course, but I still think theres something about the general notion of someone 'being fertile'-an indicator of health etc - that probably triggers something. And then theres always Alex's big tits theory.

It doesnt take much for Renton to get started on the blacks does it? Joke!

Serious question; is it some sort of evolutionary pre-programmed response blokes have? I mean if a girl's pregnant then it obviously suggests fertility....so is it that that blokes are attracted to, subconsciously?

Thats beautiful mate! Sorry to be a fuckwad, but I was having to minimize screen everytime that arse ava came up. Shame as it was a very nice arse too.

Can you change the ava, mate? Some of us are at work. PS it's not fooling anyone anyway, you rampant bender!

Mileage doesn't matter because it is a far too uncertain factor to insurance companies. Again, the calculation is based on how much insured events a caused by a specific group. It doesn't matter to the insurance company how often or how good someone drives, but if his insurance contribution covers the risk of an insured incident. Anyway, a terrible driver who uses his car once a year is much more likely that he covers his risk by his contribution than a good driver. 45109[/snapback] Gol's driven over 300,000 miles though. Thats half a million of your wacky euro 'kilometres'. You can't argue with logic like that. You're wasting your sausage breath mate!

You're both gay though, right? 45108[/snapback] I think technically speaking, Wacky is a pre-op tranny.

As another view I've been a cyclist as an adult for about 11 years and nearly every minor accident and near miss I've had has involved a woman driver. Before anyone starts I never cycle on the pavement or go through red lights. I don't know whether its a thing of girls not using bikes as much as kids and having no concept of how fast semi-fit adults can go or what but its something I'd stand by within normal "shocking generalisation" levels. 45102[/snapback] They can't throw or catch properly either tbh. In my experience.

I think the insurance doesn't give a toss about a woman driving 1 mile every week to her hairdresser or a man cruising with his hairdresser the land up and down all day. They are just interested in how likely it is statistically that the driver will cause an accident... 45051[/snapback] So if I drove 140 miles a day, don't you think I'd statistically be more likely to be involved in an accident that my mother who drives 3 miles to get to work? 45060[/snapback] Mileage doesn't matter. If someone male who drives 1000 miles a day causes an accident every 1500 miles he statistically is still more accident prone than a woman that drives 5 miles a week and statistically causes an accident every 10 miles. 45080[/snapback] Hang on, you've lost me. Are you saying that insurances companies DO actually take into account how far you drive, or are you saying that the distance you drive has no bearing on how likely you are to cause an accident (fatigue for example, no?). I understand what you are saying about the statistics behind how per mile accidents happen, but I think you're ignoring the fact that you're more likely to crash driving longer distances than you are short distances. I'd also like to see the stats about how many accidents are on motorways compared to minor roads tbh. In my experience (and I hope I'm not gonna get labelled sexist for sharing my own experience here ) but most (not all) accidents I've seen looked to have been caused by females. 45086[/snapback] Unless you're a road accident investigator then we should probably disregard your less than scientific 'findings' 45087[/snapback] So basically you can disregard anyone else's views on anything which they don't have a profession in? Yeah, ok then I've driven over 300,000 miles in my life, and seen plenty of accidents. I didn't once state that it was scientific fact, and if you look back I actually started with "in my experience". Well done though, very amusing reply 45092[/snapback] Fucking hell mate! Time of the month? Seriously though, although I was just joking, no I dont actually think the mere fact that you drive that many motorway miles would qualify you to give that sort of an opinion. You're basing your finding on what you've rubbernecked as you drive past shirley? It's not like you're out there taking witness statements and skid measurements etc. I know what you're getting at though generally. You'll note that I've already made the point about rear end shunts and my spacial awareness theory. 45096[/snapback] Hence why I didn't say... "Women cause more accidents = FACT" I said, "in my experience".... and they "look" to have.... Yes, not scientific at all, just thought I'd share it. I'll refrain in future though Oh, and I've been crashed into three times. Twice by women and once by a man. Statistics prove therefore......... 45098[/snapback] Bit touchy in my experience tbh.

I think the insurance doesn't give a toss about a woman driving 1 mile every week to her hairdresser or a man cruising with his hairdresser the land up and down all day. They are just interested in how likely it is statistically that the driver will cause an accident... 45051[/snapback] So if I drove 140 miles a day, don't you think I'd statistically be more likely to be involved in an accident that my mother who drives 3 miles to get to work? 45060[/snapback] Mileage doesn't matter. If someone male who drives 1000 miles a day causes an accident every 1500 miles he statistically is still more accident prone than a woman that drives 5 miles a week and statistically causes an accident every 10 miles. 45080[/snapback] Hang on, you've lost me. Are you saying that insurances companies DO actually take into account how far you drive, or are you saying that the distance you drive has no bearing on how likely you are to cause an accident (fatigue for example, no?). I understand what you are saying about the statistics behind how per mile accidents happen, but I think you're ignoring the fact that you're more likely to crash driving longer distances than you are short distances. I'd also like to see the stats about how many accidents are on motorways compared to minor roads tbh. In my experience (and I hope I'm not gonna get labelled sexist for sharing my own experience here ) but most (not all) accidents I've seen looked to have been caused by females. 45086[/snapback] Unless you're a road accident investigator then we should probably disregard your less than scientific 'findings' 45087[/snapback] So basically you can disregard anyone else's views on anything which they don't have a profession in? Yeah, ok then I've driven over 300,000 miles in my life, and seen plenty of accidents. I didn't once state that it was scientific fact, and if you look back I actually started with "in my experience". Well done though, very amusing reply 45092[/snapback] Fucking hell mate! Time of the month? Seriously though, although I was just joking, no I dont actually think the mere fact that you drive that many motorway miles would qualify you to give that sort of an opinion. You're basing your finding on what you've rubbernecked as you drive past shirley? It's not like you're out there taking witness statements and skid measurements etc. I know what you're getting at though generally. You'll note that I've already made the point about rear end shunts and my spacial awareness theory.

On a separate note, Alex suffers the indignity of driving a girls car and can therefore feel rightly agrieved that he doesnt qualify for the favourable girls/benders insurance premiums.

I think the insurance doesn't give a toss about a woman driving 1 mile every week to her hairdresser or a man cruising with his hairdresser the land up and down all day. They are just interested in how likely it is statistically that the driver will cause an accident... 45051[/snapback] So if I drove 140 miles a day, don't you think I'd statistically be more likely to be involved in an accident that my mother who drives 3 miles to get to work? 45060[/snapback] Mileage doesn't matter. If someone male who drives 1000 miles a day causes an accident every 1500 miles he statistically is still more accident prone than a woman that drives 5 miles a week and statistically causes an accident every 10 miles. 45080[/snapback] Hang on, you've lost me. Are you saying that insurances companies DO actually take into account how far you drive, or are you saying that the distance you drive has no bearing on how likely you are to cause an accident (fatigue for example, no?). I understand what you are saying about the statistics behind how per mile accidents happen, but I think you're ignoring the fact that you're more likely to crash driving longer distances than you are short distances. I'd also like to see the stats about how many accidents are on motorways compared to minor roads tbh. In my experience (and I hope I'm not gonna get labelled sexist for sharing my own experience here ) but most (not all) accidents I've seen looked to have been caused by females. 45086[/snapback] Unless you're a road accident investigator then we should probably disregard your less than scientific 'findings'

Well I know she's not you as she works for a living. What's my favourite food? I thought you were Craig. I don't know anyone personally on here, as far as I am aware. My wife says she posts very occasionally but I don't even know her user name... 45061[/snapback] alex 45063[/snapback] I thought it might be Gemmill. 45081[/snapback] Hobson's Choice tbh 45082[/snapback] 45084[/snapback] Renton's speechless again!

I thought you were Craig. I don't know anyone personally on here, as far as I am aware. My wife says she posts very occasionally but I don't even know her user name... 45061[/snapback] alex 45063[/snapback]

They already ask for your projected milegae though, so I wouldnt bank on it. I think Bridget made a point elsewhere (which she quite freely conceded actually, nobody was pressing her on it) that women are on average more responsible for rear end shunts. It got me to thinking whether that was a spacial awareness thing??? There was a fascinating series of programmes on the beeb recently which highlighted the differences between the sexes-and spacial awareness was one such area where females were less 'advanced'. It was recognised that women were better articulators however, which is a decent trade off from their point of view i'd say.

If by cheek you mean arse cheek, then I've noticed Smooth Operators tongue in Wacky's 'cheek' a fair bit of late. But thats welcome respite from the rampant homophobia on here. Personally, I welcome this new wave of diversity to the board.

jizzfest tbh

attention seeking tbh.

But just to recap, it's still shit though.

Q: What did Wacky Jnr do when he heard that the local kids had discovered all your dwarf porn in your shed. A: Ritchies moustache

Just a red cross. Have I been whooshed?

Is Gemmill really ginger? .........can't say fairer than that!

It's not that hard to become a barrister - you have to pay your own outrageous fees to do the bar, after all. But once your qualified you can just about forget about getting a job if your not part of the old boy's network - basically if you didn't go to RGS (or equivalent) you are fucked. Its not about ability, but who you are and who you know. Manc-mag - spot on about the pomposity of medical students, I know this from experience. 44496[/snapback] And, consequently not many law students become barristers. We're agreeing right? 44498[/snapback] I'm not entirely sure. We all seem to be in agreement that GF's a complete scrounger, like.