Gemmill

Who is crying? I'm kinda enjoying it. (I am pointing it out however and usually people don't like that sort of truth - I mean objectively what does say Gemmial bring to the table but Ner ne ner ne ner ner? Honestly?) Gemmill's got a sense of humour, that's what he brings. As you haven't got one, you can't see this. And yes, you can picture me stroking his gonads if that's what turns you on. He does? He likes his Albert Logic "humour" I'll give him that (only used it about 15 times now ). I take encouragement from the fact that you don't find me funny, Fop.

Im still trying to work this one out Are you saying that last staurday and the saturday before your "mate" pissed the bed and next saturday he has a new "lass" staying so he doesnt want to repeat the feat? If so, does he have a time machine in an H G Wells stylee where after agreeing to her staying he remembers the previous two weeks shenanigans and therefore goes back in time two months to stop drinking and hopefully not piss himself? I could explain what he means, I think, but Gemmill wouldn't like it. (and might well poo himself in outrage) I wouldn't bother. I think peasepud was joking too Fop. I would steer clear of trying to fully explain any answers to the question "Why did the chicken cross the road?" too.

Stick me on that list an'all.

And still same old boring standard issue insult + ner ne ner ner, without realising you are what you "condemn" (although in a slightly different and frankly less intelligent context). Like I say, I give up. You're battering me with a stick called dullness and I can take no more.

I give up. I'm just trying to point out that you're coming across like a boring arsewipe, but you're not having it. Keep on doing what you're doing instead. People seem to really enjoy reading what you have to say.

Only makes me more determined to be frank, and the whole thing more enjoyable tbf, one lone voice against the tide of idiocy. (and there's nothing quite so amusing as watching mutual group gonad stroking ) Fop man, give your head a shake. Personally I've never noticed this side to you before but your acting like a humourless dick today for some reason. Ah I see so point something out, and then being attacked for it is "acting like a humourless dick" is it? Ok. Me: What do you call a three legged donkey? Fop: Dunno Me: A wonky Fop: But why would you call it a wonky? The fact that it has three legs doesn't detract from the fact that it is still a donkey. Losing a limb doesn't cause an animal to change species, and besides, I'm not sure that there even exists a species known as "wonky". If you mean losing the limb will have affected its ability to stand up straight, you should consider the example of other animals that lose limbs and the amazing ability that nature has to adjust to adversity. There's a very good chance that your three-legged donkey would learn to adapt and would be able to walk and stand straight, thereby rendering the wonky label redundant. Ooo a strawman, see I KNEW you could do i if you tried. Effectively pointing out that that's exactly what you did to SLP's "joke". Hmm... you think that's a great "joke" do you? Satirical comment maybe, but I can't think of much great satire that is based upon bollocks (unless of course he is cleverly lampooning himself ). But if that is the sort of thing that has you rolling around on the floor then..... well actually make that isn't so shocking. And you're acting like you always do I see. I know I'm being honest by pointing you're Ner ne ner ner ism out, glad you agree. Ah I see the mob is always right is it? Hehe I'll keep that little gem in mind. It's like arguing with the class nerd. All acne and shit comebacks.

Who is crying? I'm kinda enjoying it. (I am pointing it out however and usually people don't like that sort of truth - I mean objectively what does say Gemmial bring to the table but Ner ne ner ne ner ner? Honestly?) Yeah, that's right, you're just exposing us all to the truth, Fop. In the most boring way imaginable. And I'm biased, but I would sooner read one of my posts than one of yours any day of the week.

Only makes me more determined to be frank, and the whole thing more enjoyable tbf, one lone voice against the tide of idiocy. (and there's nothing quite so amusing as watching mutual group gonad stroking ) Fop man, give your head a shake. Personally I've never noticed this side to you before but your acting like a humourless dick today for some reason. Ah I see so point something out, and then being attacked for it is "acting like a humourless dick" is it? Ok. Me: What do you call a three legged donkey? Fop: Dunno Me: A wonky Fop: But why would you call it a wonky? The fact that it has three legs doesn't detract from the fact that it is still a donkey. Losing a limb doesn't cause an animal to change species, and besides, I'm not sure that there even exists a species known as "wonky". If you mean losing the limb will have affected its ability to stand up straight, you should consider the example of other animals that lose limbs and the amazing ability that nature has to adjust to adversity. There's a very good chance that your three-legged donkey would learn to adapt and would be able to walk and stand straight, thereby rendering the wonky label redundant. Ooo a strawman, see I KNEW you could do i if you tried. Effectively pointing out that that's exactly what you did to SLP's "joke". Honestly Fop, you are acting like a complete and utter prick. And you can call me telling you that you're acting like a prick "more of the same tactic" etc. if you like, but in reality it's just honesty. I know you think everyone else is just ganging up on you to tell you that you're acting like a prick too, but again, they're just pointing out what is obvious to everyone but you. Keep on "raging against the toontastic machine" if you like though.

Only makes me more determined to be frank, and the whole thing more enjoyable tbf, one lone voice against the tide of idiocy. (and there's nothing quite so amusing as watching mutual group gonad stroking ) Fop man, give your head a shake. Personally I've never noticed this side to you before but your acting like a humourless dick today for some reason. Ah I see so point something out, and then being attacked for it is "acting like a humourless dick" is it? Ok. Me: What do you call a three legged donkey? Fop: Dunno Me: A wonky Fop: But why would you call it a wonky? The fact that it has three legs doesn't detract from the fact that it is still a donkey. Losing a limb doesn't cause an animal to change species, and besides, I'm not sure that there even exists a species known as "wonky". If you mean losing the limb will have affected its ability to stand up straight, you should consider the example of other animals that lose limbs and the amazing ability that nature has to adjust to adversity. There's a very good chance that your three-legged donkey would learn to adapt and would be able to walk and stand straight, thereby rendering the wonky label redundant. *strokes Gemmills gonads* Meenzer should have posted that. He's too busy cupping while SLP strokes.

I think you're being very kind to yourself there tbh. I think being a desperately boring dickhead could be considered a "fault" too. Yet again true to form. (come on call me pooey pants, you KNOW you want to ) I don't do requests, Albert. Oh my how cutting. (you must have been saving that one for a special occasion I guess) Ner ne ner ner next maybe? You've got the upper hand here Fop. I'm the one that looks silly. You boring dickhead.

Only makes me more determined to be frank, and the whole thing more enjoyable tbf, one lone voice against the tide of idiocy. (and there's nothing quite so amusing as watching mutual group gonad stroking ) Fop man, give your head a shake. Personally I've never noticed this side to you before but your acting like a humourless dick today for some reason. Ah I see so point something out, and then being attacked for it is "acting like a humourless dick" is it? Ok. Me: What do you call a three legged donkey? Fop: Dunno Me: A wonky Fop: But why would you call it a wonky? The fact that it has three legs doesn't detract from the fact that it is still a donkey. Losing a limb doesn't cause an animal to change species, and besides, I'm not sure that there even exists a species known as "wonky". If you mean losing the limb will have affected its ability to stand up straight, you should consider the example of other animals that lose limbs and the amazing ability that nature has to adjust to adversity. There's a very good chance that your three-legged donkey would learn to adapt and would be able to walk and stand straight, thereby rendering the wonky label redundant.

I think you're being very kind to yourself there tbh. I think being a desperately boring dickhead could be considered a "fault" too. Yet again true to form. (come on call me pooey pants, you KNOW you want to ) I don't do requests, Albert.

Only makes me more determined to be frank, and the whole thing more enjoyable tbf, one lone voice against the tide of idiocy. (and there's nothing quite so amusing as watching mutual group gonad stroking ) You're now even more determined to be a boring humourless twat? I'm honestly not sure that that's possible.

I think you're being very kind to yourself there tbh. I think being a desperately boring dickhead could be considered a "fault" too.

The Fop = Humourless Albert Logic clique seems to be taking on new members at quite a rate.

Bat your lips off. Where do these mongs come up with this stuff. Oooo I'll box your ears! I'll bop you on the nose! I'll bat your lips off!

Nobody said we were going to get relegated, no question. Sensible people justifiably raised it as a concern. If you think it was impossible then you're an idiot tbqf. Oooo is Renton now the board's bully? Or does Fop just bring out the worst in people with his cockknockery?

Both Nancy and Big Suze are nice tbh. I'm two episodes away from finishing Season 3, then I'll start in on these ones.

I'll consider myself pwnt then.

I assume from that that you think it's a big achievement? I think what I always thought, that it was possible. I've just enjoying all the revisionism that's going on is all. I'm assuming you're referring to the fact that people expected us to get beat, and then aren't all that impressed when we manage a draw? In which case you would do well to consider the context that the statement was made in - i.e. We're getting outplayed and beaten by the teams we need to/should be beating, and in that context achieving a result against Chelsea is no big deal. Now who sounds like Albert Logic? *Ahem* "Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz" is the "appropriate" response I think? Aye fancy wanting someone to take a comment in the context it was written. I'm a veritable Dr. Spock. Mr Spock, although you could be a Dr Spock who knows. Proving your Albert Logic credentials beyond all doubt there, pulling me up on Star Trek trivia. Heh do you know who Dr Spock is? If finding out is going to mean reading another one of your posts, I'll stick with ignorance, cheers.

You are the board's Softy Walter tbh. And Fop, I reckon SLP was making a joke. I don't think he was too concerned about historical accuracy. You utter fucking dweeb.

I have a shit in the morning pre-shower. It's all about the planning.

I assume from that that you think it's a big achievement? I think what I always thought, that it was possible. I've just enjoying all the revisionism that's going on is all. I'm assuming you're referring to the fact that people expected us to get beat, and then aren't all that impressed when we manage a draw? In which case you would do well to consider the context that the statement was made in - i.e. We're getting outplayed and beaten by the teams we need to/should be beating, and in that context achieving a result against Chelsea is no big deal. Now who sounds like Albert Logic? *Ahem* "Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz" is the "appropriate" response I think? Aye fancy wanting someone to take a comment in the context it was written. I'm a veritable Dr. Spock. Mr Spock, although you could be a Dr Spock who knows. Proving your Albert Logic credentials beyond all doubt there, pulling me up on Star Trek trivia.

I still like him as a player, but think that it would be the best for both - player and club. He is too much a hate figure for a lot of fans to ever win them over. And for the club he is a luxury they cannot afford. And he hasn't given a fair return for his horrendous wages in the last couple of years. And at the age of 28 he isn't a prospect anymore, so to get at least a transfer fee in return wouldn't be too bad - if only he could get decently replaced, something I am not too optimistic about. But watch him go to a club like Spurs and become a cracking player for a couple years... Sorry, that bit about him being a hate figure is nonsense imo. In actual fact, he is one of the most over-rated players in the history of football imo, but if people did "hate" him, so what? Is that contributing to his poor overall play and chronic lack of goals? I have no problem with people hating him. Everyone is entitled to his opinion, how stupid it might be. And it is my opinion that the fact that a lot of fans don't like him has little to do with his actual ability and performances but rather for non-football reasons (like his handwriting). And I don't think that a player will feel comfortable in a surrounding where he is always an easy target for the abuse of fans. And I do think that psychology plays a big part in player's performances. I forgot he dissed Renton when he asked for an autograph. Hell hath no fury like a groupie scorned!

I assume from that that you think it's a big achievement? I think what I always thought, that it was possible. I've just enjoying all the revisionism that's going on is all. I'm assuming you're referring to the fact that people expected us to get beat, and then aren't all that impressed when we manage a draw? In which case you would do well to consider the context that the statement was made in - i.e. We're getting outplayed and beaten by the teams we need to/should be beating, and in that context achieving a result against Chelsea is no big deal. Now who sounds like Albert Logic? *Ahem* "Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz" is the "appropriate" response I think? Aye fancy wanting someone to take a comment in the context it was written. I'm a veritable Dr. Spock.