Jump to content

Ken

Members
  • Posts

    2213
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Ken

  1. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-20/what-can-north-korea-already-do-without-nuclear-weapons/8543532 All conjecture and hypotheticals really. In the advent of war it would depend on NK's strategy and how she would use her assets. An all out artillery barrage would destroy most of the city and its infastructure.
  2. NK is chest beating. All they want to assure themselves of is their sovereignty. There is no war unless the US kicks it off. If it kicks off SK will turn against America in the end and blame them for being destroyed. It assists in China's long term strategy of regional dominance
  3. Yeah, almost a stone throw. American military advisers admit that they can do little in the first 48 hours of a barrage. In that time Seoul would be flattened.
  4. Intervention was an opportunity in the early to mid 90's under Clinton. His advisers opted against it instead opting for appeasement in the form of cool-water reactor technology I believe in return for some empty promises to discontinue their weapons program. That ship has sailed well and truly now. Nobody knows how advanced NK's weapons program is. They have demonstrated their capability to deliver warheads with their ICBM's but whether they have managed to miniaturise their nukes to fit onto their missiles is anyone's guess. That is the end goal in order to guarantee the sovereignty of their regime. The US's hands are tied on this. Attacking NK guarantees the destruction of Seoul and SK at a minimum. It is in the best interests for the US not to go down this path as it plays into China's hands by portraying America as the aggressor and SK would likely fall under China's sphere of influence as a result. China's ultimate goal is to expunge America from Asia and ultimately the Pacific to become the dominant power in the region.
  5. Do you still believe the earth is flat?
  6. Wolfy. I seriously thought you were a WUM, but you are ill. You have probably been told this before but to take so much time and effort to come up with your tin-foil hat theories... Nut job.
  7. Well, no. He'd need to knock him out in the first five rounds which is unlikely but isn't impossible. Wouldn't surprise if he's winning the fight when they sit down after the 5th or 6th. Mayweather will own McGregor in the last 6 rounds.
  8. The closer this fight gets, the more I have a feeling Conor could get him. Faster, stronger and timing is better. Conor is no Pikey.
  9. Have been firing missiles towards Japan for two years. That isn't a concern, what is concerning is the level of sophistication of each missile launched. Japan could smash NK, Trump would love to smash NK, but NK has the upper hand in the fact it could smash SK and nobody could do anything about it.
  10. Ken

    Terrorism

    http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/three-terror-raids-carried-out-across-sydney-20170729-gxlgip.html
  11. Ken

    Yes Gemmill...

    Saw them in 2007. Yeah mostly their lyrics were dark, but now we know why now.
  12. Ken

    Watches

    Autran and Viala. German efficiency.
  13. Thing is McGregor is smart. He'll be defensive to conserve in rounds when he needs a second, third, fourth and fifth wind. Wouldn't surprise if McGregor wins the first three or four rounds but then he'll gets dominated after that if he doesn't knock Mayweather down. Mayweather doesn't have it in him to knock McGregor out. But he'll win by sheer weight of volume over six or seven rounds in the end.
  14. Conor McGregor could retire after this fight. He won't though, it sounds like his allegiances lie with the UFC which is good. It is where he belongs.
  15. Haven't hoyed since I was 16 tbh champ.
  16. No cheeky cunt. I don't lose my shit. You are talking about internet shit haha. Fuck that. I live in Sydney. You live in Newcastle. I have women to respond to... Hahaha
  17. Yeah, it's a joke. Funny as fuck. No problem man.
  18. Not Tom but little adios punching away the lightweight he is.
  19. Re-read page 50 from the top. Adios started this little infraction. Tom and adios had been colluding to be being cheeky little cunts. Adios tried hard but failed. Just doesn't have it.
  20. Reported. Have you not been made aware of the new standard operating procedure required?
  21. Fuck off, you little Northern Ireland cunt.
  22. Thanks Gloomy. Revealer of the truth. You don't require the truth syrup.
  23. Right, I see a piss take here. Good job. Very good job. Well done.
  24. Is that so... Never seen a report button on your little phone screen or monitor, yet you mention "report" randomly in a legitimate forum thread? You are a fucking idiot.
  25. Trying to turn this around now in desperation are you, you flop?!? "Reported" You sad wanker.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.