tooner

not you too I'm surprised you thought that highly of me, to be honest. Care to answer the question? what sort of books do I read ? Not left wing politically-slanted books ..... ditto left wing politically-slanted newspapers either. I've made a few posts in the "what are you reading" thread...politically, you could just say I have my views and reading a book by someone out of touch with reality isn't going to change them. What sort of books do you read ? I'm surprised some people on here actually have time for anything, the time they spend on here. They can't be reading too much, or working, that's for sure. why not? bit of an ivory tower way of going about things no? at least if you read view points contrary to your own it would give you a better understanding of the whole picture of things. I've read lots of books/articles/newspapers with views that i feel fall outside of my personal views/opinions. knowledge is power. read everything IMO. Well. Let's put it this way. I did once. But now, I don't. thats it? one time? ...to each thier own. you mean, each to their own you don't read the right material, obviously i guess take your victories where you can get them eh? since you've been shown up in the rest of the thread....

not you too I'm surprised you thought that highly of me, to be honest. Care to answer the question? what sort of books do I read ? Not left wing politically-slanted books ..... ditto left wing politically-slanted newspapers either. I've made a few posts in the "what are you reading" thread...politically, you could just say I have my views and reading a book by someone out of touch with reality isn't going to change them. What sort of books do you read ? I'm surprised some people on here actually have time for anything, the time they spend on here. They can't be reading too much, or working, that's for sure. why not? bit of an ivory tower way of going about things no? at least if you read view points contrary to your own it would give you a better understanding of the whole picture of things. I've read lots of books/articles/newspapers with views that i feel fall outside of my personal views/opinions. knowledge is power. read everything IMO. Well. Let's put it this way. I did once. But now, I don't. thats it? one time? ...to each thier own.

not you too I'm surprised you thought that highly of me, to be honest. Care to answer the question? what sort of books do I read ? Not left wing politically-slanted books ..... ditto left wing politically-slanted newspapers either. I've made a few posts in the "what are you reading" thread...politically, you could just say I have my views and reading a book by someone out of touch with reality isn't going to change them. What sort of books do you read ? I'm surprised some people on here actually have time for anything, the time they spend on here. They can't be reading too much, or working, that's for sure. why not? bit of an ivory tower way of going about things no? at least if you read view points contrary to your own it would give you a better understanding of the whole picture of things. I've read lots of books/articles/newspapers with views that i feel fall outside of my personal views/opinions. knowledge is power. read everything IMO.

totally agree. That is why I posted it. I expected one or two to play it down or even defend it though, but there is really no excuse for it at all. It's of even more concern that this is the sort of mentality they would try and impose on us, because they certainly won't change their ways in the name of "multiculturism and tolerance". Not a chance. well, i don't agree with that. this kind of thing doesn't happen in most parts of the civilised world. britain is a good example of multiculturism - it works. the taliban however, are barbarians. i don't think we will win the war in afghanistan and that is a real worry. these people are animals. I don't really think that multiculurism is working, nor will it ever work. For it to work, the onus is on those accepted into a country to conform ie when in Rome do as the Romans do, but wherever muslims go in the world, they are totally intolerant of said countries traditions and cultures. Everything has to stop for Allah so far as they are concerned, and they expect others to do the same. In their homeland, yes, but not elsewhere. This problem is now a worldwide one, although the UK because of the PC correct brigade has it bigger than most if not the biggest, and will only accelerate. Our politicians don't have the balls to tell the pc correct brigade where to go, basically. Prime example here: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/172324...-dress-ban-vote "The law's author, Daniel Bacquelaine, said a burka is incompatible with basic security as everyone in public must be recognisable and clashes with the principles of a society that respects the rights of all." huge over-simplification, i would agree with that statement if you had singled out "fundamentalist islam", but I would also point out that fundamentalist christianity does much the same thing, ie trampling local indiginous cultures in the name of saving the population from eternal damnation. and as far as multiculturalism goes, sure it works. It's worked over here, despite resistance by portions of the population that are scared of anything/anyone they can't identify with on the basis of a first impression. I would love to take part more in this discussion today but I have to go and study , I look forward to having a debate on this further after tomorrow 11 am local time. ah. It becomes clearer. You're a 14 year old then hardly dipshit...I wrote my Professional Practice Exam yesterday... Well boogalloo. What fancy theories, from the comfort of your armchair, did you spout on about ? Leazes, are you aware that it is quite normal for people to take courses and exams throughout their working lives as part of their continued professional development? And yes, this usually involves studying and the reading of books. Renton, Renton.......my point is that these lefties read books by other lefties......get it ? Lefties who know nothing about the mindset of these people. They think they are dealing with educated and intelligent human beings. They think they play by our rules. Well, surprise surprise. They do not. In the real world, they are savages and will kill anybody who isn't like they are. You know as well as I do that this multiculturism/loss of immigration control is becoming more of a problem, you have said so. So what is your point ? The world isn't a "fair" place. Any fucker can sit and read a book written by someone who knows fuck all about the reality of all this and take it on board.

Love those two as well Billy. They're the only two of his I've actually read. My mate is more of a sci-fi buff than I am. Introduced me to the genius of Vonnegut. my favorite, makes me laugh.

If I could interject here - we follow God, not Allah, unless you're speaking Arabic. Allah just means God in Arabic. German-speaking Christians don't worship "Gott" any more than Latinos worship "Dios", so why is it we always get pegged as the ones who worship some "other" god? (Hint: it's because many Westerners don't even know that Islam follows on from what they so blithely term the "judeo-christian tradition.") You may now return to your regularly scheduled quote pyramids. EDIT: French-speaking Muslims talk about "Dieu", not Allah (well, except when they are actually praying, because in Islam the actual words of the prayer are supposed to be recited in Arabic exclusively.) The prayers of Arabic-speaking Christians (such as the 10% of Egypt's population that adhere to the Coptic church, such as the Syriacs and Maronites, etc etc) are addressed to Allah. Just to give you some additional (and probably totally un-called for) perspective on this topic. SECOND EDIT: There I go making an ass of myself. I implied that Copts speak Arabic when they pray. Wrong, their prayers are in Coptic. Glad I could get that one cleared up, since someone was totally going to call me on it thanks for the info....i guess to be accurate i should have said those who follow the teachings of Mohammed. please excuse my previous oversight.

so you're not going to tell us what your fancy solutions are ? Like, "give in to Islam, build a mosque on every corner for them, they're nice blokes really, and we can all live happily ever after" .....you first. your ideas (of me and of "the real world") are far more enlightening than anything i could come up with given my apparent/perceived lack of "real world" experience. so please i insist, after you...... What are you asking exactly ? You know my views, and I know yours, which you don't deny [see above post] Are you going to give a powerpoint aided lecture to the Taliban telling them how uncivlised they are i was asking you to provide your "fancy solutions" so then, why don't you give me a quick over-view of my ideas if you know them contrary to your assertions, i've never made any suggestions as to what we should be doing to the Taliban no, I was asking for your solutions to the Islam problem, but you think there isn't one though. Or do you ? Enlighten us as to your "studies" ? You know my views. They are in this very thread. is there a problem with Islam? i was unaware, not to split hairs but I would say the problem is with radical/fundmentalist Islam, but the vast majority of the over 1 billion of those that follow Allah would not fit into that category. my studies? why the interest in my studies? which ones? what i went to school for or what I was studying for the last month or so? what do you think i studied? ask parky he'll tell you. no problem with the vast majority of over 1 billion ? What utter rubbish. Is that what your "studies" tell you ? Why should I ask Parky, I'm not bothered what you do or don't do but I'm sure you can tell me yourself if you want to. On the other hand, confidentiality is an important thing in life [ahem], so it's entirely up to you. riiiiight, why'd you ask then? all that info is on the board somewhere. Tell you what, i'll give you 20 questions to figure it out.....ok go. oh, and please provide proof to the contrary of my above statement about the majority of the muslim population. what sort of problems have there been? keep in mind not believing in JC does not qualify as a problem, only as a cultural difference.....ok go.

careful, you're liable if it kills him.

so you're not going to tell us what your fancy solutions are ? Like, "give in to Islam, build a mosque on every corner for them, they're nice blokes really, and we can all live happily ever after" .....you first. your ideas (of me and of "the real world") are far more enlightening than anything i could come up with given my apparent/perceived lack of "real world" experience. so please i insist, after you...... What are you asking exactly ? You know my views, and I know yours, which you don't deny [see above post] Are you going to give a powerpoint aided lecture to the Taliban telling them how uncivlised they are i was asking you to provide your "fancy solutions" so then, why don't you give me a quick over-view of my ideas if you know them contrary to your assertions, i've never made any suggestions as to what we should be doing to the Taliban no, I was asking for your solutions to the Islam problem, but you think there isn't one though. Or do you ? Enlighten us as to your "studies" ? You know my views. They are in this very thread. is there a problem with Islam? i was unaware, not to split hairs but I would say the problem is with radical/fundmentalist Islam, but the vast majority of the over 1 billion of those that follow Allah would not fit into that category. my studies? why the interest in my studies? which ones? what i went to school for or what I was studying for the last month or so? what do you think i studied? ask parky he'll tell you.

so you're not going to tell us what your fancy solutions are ? Like, "give in to Islam, build a mosque on every corner for them, they're nice blokes really, and we can all live happily ever after" .....you first. your ideas (of me and of "the real world") are far more enlightening than anything i could come up with given my apparent/perceived lack of "real world" experience. so please i insist, after you...... What are you asking exactly ? You know my views, and I know yours, which you don't deny [see above post] Are you going to give a powerpoint aided lecture to the Taliban telling them how uncivlised they are i was asking you to provide your "fancy solutions" so then, why don't you give me a quick over-view of my ideas if you know them contrary to your assertions, i've never made any suggestions as to what we should be doing to the Taliban

so you're not going to tell us what your fancy solutions are ? Like, "give in to Islam, build a mosque on every corner for them, they're nice blokes really, and we can all live happily ever after" .....you first. your ideas (of me and of "the real world") are far more enlightening than anything i could come up with given my apparent/perceived lack of "real world" experience. so please i insist, after you......

about as shocking as sunrise this morning.

totally agree. That is why I posted it. I expected one or two to play it down or even defend it though, but there is really no excuse for it at all. It's of even more concern that this is the sort of mentality they would try and impose on us, because they certainly won't change their ways in the name of "multiculturism and tolerance". Not a chance. well, i don't agree with that. this kind of thing doesn't happen in most parts of the civilised world. britain is a good example of multiculturism - it works. the taliban however, are barbarians. i don't think we will win the war in afghanistan and that is a real worry. these people are animals. I don't really think that multiculurism is working, nor will it ever work. For it to work, the onus is on those accepted into a country to conform ie when in Rome do as the Romans do, but wherever muslims go in the world, they are totally intolerant of said countries traditions and cultures. Everything has to stop for Allah so far as they are concerned, and they expect others to do the same. In their homeland, yes, but not elsewhere. This problem is now a worldwide one, although the UK because of the PC correct brigade has it bigger than most if not the biggest, and will only accelerate. Our politicians don't have the balls to tell the pc correct brigade where to go, basically. Prime example here: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/172324...-dress-ban-vote "The law's author, Daniel Bacquelaine, said a burka is incompatible with basic security as everyone in public must be recognisable and clashes with the principles of a society that respects the rights of all." huge over-simplification, i would agree with that statement if you had singled out "fundamentalist islam", but I would also point out that fundamentalist christianity does much the same thing, ie trampling local indiginous cultures in the name of saving the population from eternal damnation. and as far as multiculturalism goes, sure it works. It's worked over here, despite resistance by portions of the population that are scared of anything/anyone they can't identify with on the basis of a first impression. I would love to take part more in this discussion today but I have to go and study , I look forward to having a debate on this further after tomorrow 11 am local time. ah. It becomes clearer. You're a 14 year old then hardly dipshit...I wrote my Professional Practice Exam yesterday... Well boogalloo. What fancy theories, from the comfort of your armchair, did you spout on about ? haha...you're a joke. you first LM tell me something about yourself.......yeah, didn't think so. What I do for a living is on the board somewhere, ask parky he knows. other than that piss-off, typical LM style, getting raked across the coals so you revert to 6yr old name calling tactics .....as I've said you're a fucking cartoon man. aye sure, a Canadian student telling us all how to put the world to rights hehehe....take yer meds. so i guess thats a no for any insight to the reasons why you are so much higher and mightier than us 'booklearned' chaps. yes. fits in nicely with your thread title....truly shocking

totally agree. That is why I posted it. I expected one or two to play it down or even defend it though, but there is really no excuse for it at all. It's of even more concern that this is the sort of mentality they would try and impose on us, because they certainly won't change their ways in the name of "multiculturism and tolerance". Not a chance. well, i don't agree with that. this kind of thing doesn't happen in most parts of the civilised world. britain is a good example of multiculturism - it works. the taliban however, are barbarians. i don't think we will win the war in afghanistan and that is a real worry. these people are animals. I don't really think that multiculurism is working, nor will it ever work. For it to work, the onus is on those accepted into a country to conform ie when in Rome do as the Romans do, but wherever muslims go in the world, they are totally intolerant of said countries traditions and cultures. Everything has to stop for Allah so far as they are concerned, and they expect others to do the same. In their homeland, yes, but not elsewhere. This problem is now a worldwide one, although the UK because of the PC correct brigade has it bigger than most if not the biggest, and will only accelerate. Our politicians don't have the balls to tell the pc correct brigade where to go, basically. Prime example here: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/172324...-dress-ban-vote "The law's author, Daniel Bacquelaine, said a burka is incompatible with basic security as everyone in public must be recognisable and clashes with the principles of a society that respects the rights of all." huge over-simplification, i would agree with that statement if you had singled out "fundamentalist islam", but I would also point out that fundamentalist christianity does much the same thing, ie trampling local indiginous cultures in the name of saving the population from eternal damnation. and as far as multiculturalism goes, sure it works. It's worked over here, despite resistance by portions of the population that are scared of anything/anyone they can't identify with on the basis of a first impression. I would love to take part more in this discussion today but I have to go and study , I look forward to having a debate on this further after tomorrow 11 am local time. ah. It becomes clearer. You're a 14 year old then hardly dipshit...I wrote my Professional Practice Exam yesterday... Well boogalloo. What fancy theories, from the comfort of your armchair, did you spout on about ? haha...you're a joke. you first LM tell me something about yourself.......yeah, didn't think so. What I do for a living is on the board somewhere, ask parky he knows. other than that piss-off, typical LM style, getting raked across the coals so you revert to 6yr old name calling tactics .....as I've said you're a fucking cartoon man. aye sure, a Canadian student telling us all how to put the world to rights hehehe....take yer meds. so i guess thats a no for any insight to the reasons why you are so much higher and mightier than us 'booklearned' chaps.

totally agree. That is why I posted it. I expected one or two to play it down or even defend it though, but there is really no excuse for it at all. It's of even more concern that this is the sort of mentality they would try and impose on us, because they certainly won't change their ways in the name of "multiculturism and tolerance". Not a chance. well, i don't agree with that. this kind of thing doesn't happen in most parts of the civilised world. britain is a good example of multiculturism - it works. the taliban however, are barbarians. i don't think we will win the war in afghanistan and that is a real worry. these people are animals. I don't really think that multiculurism is working, nor will it ever work. For it to work, the onus is on those accepted into a country to conform ie when in Rome do as the Romans do, but wherever muslims go in the world, they are totally intolerant of said countries traditions and cultures. Everything has to stop for Allah so far as they are concerned, and they expect others to do the same. In their homeland, yes, but not elsewhere. This problem is now a worldwide one, although the UK because of the PC correct brigade has it bigger than most if not the biggest, and will only accelerate. Our politicians don't have the balls to tell the pc correct brigade where to go, basically. Prime example here: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/172324...-dress-ban-vote "The law's author, Daniel Bacquelaine, said a burka is incompatible with basic security as everyone in public must be recognisable and clashes with the principles of a society that respects the rights of all." huge over-simplification, i would agree with that statement if you had singled out "fundamentalist islam", but I would also point out that fundamentalist christianity does much the same thing, ie trampling local indiginous cultures in the name of saving the population from eternal damnation. and as far as multiculturalism goes, sure it works. It's worked over here, despite resistance by portions of the population that are scared of anything/anyone they can't identify with on the basis of a first impression. I would love to take part more in this discussion today but I have to go and study , I look forward to having a debate on this further after tomorrow 11 am local time. ah. It becomes clearer. You're a 14 year old then hardly dipshit...I wrote my Professional Practice Exam yesterday... Well boogalloo. What fancy theories, from the comfort of your armchair, did you spout on about ? haha...you're a joke. you first LM tell me something about yourself.......yeah, didn't think so. What I do for a living is on the board somewhere, ask parky he knows. other than that piss-off, typical LM style, getting raked across the coals so you revert to 6yr old name calling tactics.....as I've said you're a fucking cartoon man. aye sure, a Canadian student telling us all how to put the world to rights hehehe....take yer meds.

totally agree. That is why I posted it. I expected one or two to play it down or even defend it though, but there is really no excuse for it at all. It's of even more concern that this is the sort of mentality they would try and impose on us, because they certainly won't change their ways in the name of "multiculturism and tolerance". Not a chance. well, i don't agree with that. this kind of thing doesn't happen in most parts of the civilised world. britain is a good example of multiculturism - it works. the taliban however, are barbarians. i don't think we will win the war in afghanistan and that is a real worry. these people are animals. I don't really think that multiculurism is working, nor will it ever work. For it to work, the onus is on those accepted into a country to conform ie when in Rome do as the Romans do, but wherever muslims go in the world, they are totally intolerant of said countries traditions and cultures. Everything has to stop for Allah so far as they are concerned, and they expect others to do the same. In their homeland, yes, but not elsewhere. This problem is now a worldwide one, although the UK because of the PC correct brigade has it bigger than most if not the biggest, and will only accelerate. Our politicians don't have the balls to tell the pc correct brigade where to go, basically. Prime example here: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/172324...-dress-ban-vote "The law's author, Daniel Bacquelaine, said a burka is incompatible with basic security as everyone in public must be recognisable and clashes with the principles of a society that respects the rights of all." huge over-simplification, i would agree with that statement if you had singled out "fundamentalist islam", but I would also point out that fundamentalist christianity does much the same thing, ie trampling local indiginous cultures in the name of saving the population from eternal damnation. and as far as multiculturalism goes, sure it works. It's worked over here, despite resistance by portions of the population that are scared of anything/anyone they can't identify with on the basis of a first impression. I would love to take part more in this discussion today but I have to go and study , I look forward to having a debate on this further after tomorrow 11 am local time. ah. It becomes clearer. You're a 14 year old then hardly dipshit...I wrote my Professional Practice Exam yesterday... Well boogalloo. What fancy theories, from the comfort of your armchair, did you spout on about ? haha...you're a joke. you first LM tell me something about yourself.......yeah, didn't think so. What I do for a living is on the board somewhere, ask parky he knows. other than that piss-off, typical LM style, getting raked across the coals so you revert to 6yr old name calling tactics.....as I've said you're a fucking cartoon man.

1/2 marks....RIP Z = Z2 + C

i thought it was going to be about his Mum

totally agree. That is why I posted it. I expected one or two to play it down or even defend it though, but there is really no excuse for it at all. It's of even more concern that this is the sort of mentality they would try and impose on us, because they certainly won't change their ways in the name of "multiculturism and tolerance". Not a chance. well, i don't agree with that. this kind of thing doesn't happen in most parts of the civilised world. britain is a good example of multiculturism - it works. the taliban however, are barbarians. i don't think we will win the war in afghanistan and that is a real worry. these people are animals. I don't really think that multiculurism is working, nor will it ever work. For it to work, the onus is on those accepted into a country to conform ie when in Rome do as the Romans do, but wherever muslims go in the world, they are totally intolerant of said countries traditions and cultures. Everything has to stop for Allah so far as they are concerned, and they expect others to do the same. In their homeland, yes, but not elsewhere. This problem is now a worldwide one, although the UK because of the PC correct brigade has it bigger than most if not the biggest, and will only accelerate. Our politicians don't have the balls to tell the pc correct brigade where to go, basically. Prime example here: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/172324...-dress-ban-vote "The law's author, Daniel Bacquelaine, said a burka is incompatible with basic security as everyone in public must be recognisable and clashes with the principles of a society that respects the rights of all." huge over-simplification, i would agree with that statement if you had singled out "fundamentalist islam", but I would also point out that fundamentalist christianity does much the same thing, ie trampling local indiginous cultures in the name of saving the population from eternal damnation. and as far as multiculturalism goes, sure it works. It's worked over here, despite resistance by portions of the population that are scared of anything/anyone they can't identify with on the basis of a first impression. I would love to take part more in this discussion today but I have to go and study , I look forward to having a debate on this further after tomorrow 11 am local time. ah. It becomes clearer. You're a 14 year old then hardly dipshit...I wrote my Professional Practice Exam yesterday... and for what it's worth there is no superiority complex coming from me. WE live in a civil society, and should therefore be held to a higher standard since it those values of a civil society that allow us to have all the freedoms we enjoy. no where in this thread has anyone defended the actions of the Taliban, you can't they are by all accounts barbaric, but they are still human and certainly no less than you or I simply based on their religious beliefs or the colour of their skin. If they lived in the UK or Canada they would be prosecuted under the full extent of the law and rightfully so.

Read it in the context I put it you yank nob. Are people who cut a girls nose and ears off human? I don't think they are, it doesn't say ALL muslims aren't human does it? not sure whats worse, your geographic knowledge or the fact you think you can qualify a statement like that. Certainly the taliban and those responsible for cutting that girls nose off are barbaric without question. But it doesn't mean that they are some how less than human and therefore ok to wipe off the face of the earth. The fact that we live in a civil society and hopefully are above acts like those posted in the OP is what separates us from those that do not hold the same values. But if we indiscriminately dole out retribution in the form superior military might to eradicate those we deem as "less than human" we are no longer occupying the moral high ground.

totally agree. That is why I posted it. I expected one or two to play it down or even defend it though, but there is really no excuse for it at all. It's of even more concern that this is the sort of mentality they would try and impose on us, because they certainly won't change their ways in the name of "multiculturism and tolerance". Not a chance. well, i don't agree with that. this kind of thing doesn't happen in most parts of the civilised world. britain is a good example of multiculturism - it works. the taliban however, are barbarians. i don't think we will win the war in afghanistan and that is a real worry. these people are animals. I don't really think that multiculurism is working, nor will it ever work. For it to work, the onus is on those accepted into a country to conform ie when in Rome do as the Romans do, but wherever muslims go in the world, they are totally intolerant of said countries traditions and cultures. Everything has to stop for Allah so far as they are concerned, and they expect others to do the same. In their homeland, yes, but not elsewhere. This problem is now a worldwide one, although the UK because of the PC correct brigade has it bigger than most if not the biggest, and will only accelerate. Our politicians don't have the balls to tell the pc correct brigade where to go, basically. Prime example here: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/172324...-dress-ban-vote "The law's author, Daniel Bacquelaine, said a burka is incompatible with basic security as everyone in public must be recognisable and clashes with the principles of a society that respects the rights of all." huge over-simplification, i would agree with that statement if you had singled out "fundamentalist islam", but I would also point out that fundamentalist christianity does much the same thing, ie trampling local indiginous cultures in the name of saving the population from eternal damnation. and as far as multiculturalism goes, sure it works. It's worked over here, despite resistance by portions of the population that are scared of anything/anyone they can't identify with on the basis of a first impression. I would love to take part more in this discussion today but I have to go and study, I look forward to having a debate on this further after tomorrow 11 am local time.

horlicks. I don't drink in the afternoons, apart from a matchday, but have never been a sunday afternoon person. I can only presume if you think we don't have a serious immigration problem, due to this multiculturism rubbish and the racism of those who attempt to change the culture of countries who allow them to inhabit, that you yourself must be permanently pissed ? ...as in you're as smart as a.....

ah. Someone else who thinks they know all about me, my life, my experiences....and all because I don't agree we should allow foreigners to tell us what we can and can't say, can and can't do, in my country. While watching the do gooders allowing them slowly to chip away at our freedoms which past generations have died for, which young idiots have no comprehension of because they believe rubbish in books written by left wing do gooders who have no idea whatsoever of the mentality of people in other countries and their real attitude to the western world. Whatever. You will say in 20 years time, that Leazes was right. Too late. http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?showtopic=28504 multiculturism doesn't work,and now there is a problem. tbf I don't need to know "everything about you" to decide you're a old, bitter little-englander who refuses to be even remotely objective on multiple subjects and accuses everyone of being a do-gooder because they don't want to burn brown people at the stake. It's hardly rocket science tbh you should listen to your elders lad. what's your opinion on the opening post ? you first....considering its your post your oipinion on it is glaringly absent.......as usual. "oipinion" rattled. I think they should stick to living in their caves and the likes of you, instead of telling me I should put up with them coming here, should go over there and explain to them how uncivilised they are. *opinion...FFS rattled by you?...hardly you're a fucking cartoon.

ah. Someone else who thinks they know all about me, my life, my experiences....and all because I don't agree we should allow foreigners to tell us what we can and can't say, can and can't do, in my country. While watching the do gooders allowing them slowly to chip away at our freedoms which past generations have died for, which young idiots have no comprehension of because they believe rubbish in books written by left wing do gooders who have no idea whatsoever of the mentality of people in other countries and their real attitude to the western world. Whatever. You will say in 20 years time, that Leazes was right. Too late. http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?showtopic=28504 multiculturism doesn't work,and now there is a problem. tbf I don't need to know "everything about you" to decide you're a old, bitter little-englander who refuses to be even remotely objective on multiple subjects and accuses everyone of being a do-gooder because they don't want to burn brown people at the stake. It's hardly rocket science tbh you should listen to your elders lad. what's your opinion on the opening post ? you first....considering its your post your oipinion on it is glaringly absent.......as usual.