tooner

Fuck off boring cunt.nhows it even about me. It's been gemmill for days now. Seriously, didn't this retard get the fucking boot? What's the point in Thunderdome if the loser doesn't get the boot? Did you just bold a touchscreen typo? You sad little fuckrat, you sad, sad little fuckrat ....no i was highlighting why it was about you.....do try and follow along

Fuck off boring cunt.nhows it even about me. It's been gemmill for days now. Seriously, didn't this retard get the fucking boot? What's the point in Thunderdome if the loser doesn't get the boot?

still following me around like a lovestruck puppy :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :lol: :lol: WTF...didn't you get the boot.....where is an admin when you need one? I'm with leazes here, fuck off. i'm with the other 50 -60 people that voted against you in the thunderdome......ADMIN!!!

still following me around like a lovestruck puppy :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :lol: :lol: WTF...didn't you get the boot.....where is an admin when you need one?

right winger ? Not exclusively, only in certain things, which isn't necessarily wrong by the way......... such generalisation only highlights your own limited perspective. Anyway, I also find namby pamby's boring, but I suppose that's different ? I won't bother going into football either, because only a short while ago certain other - we'll call them "opinions" which had no factual base, spouted by many people, were also very boring too. Aren't things "boring" when you don't agree, particularly when all the facts show that your own perspective is bollocks Doddering old fool ? Maybe I think I'm trying to talk to some who are naive brainwashed numpties ? Unsurprisingly, you completely miss the point. no, I don't. Why is it ridiculous ? Because it doesn't suit your view ? It's not your opinion that is invalid, it's your argument. If you came back at those who occupy the counter point to your belief with data and accounts or note, rather than "man in a pub" here-say, people would pay attention. If you would consider other's view point instead concocting a new one for them, people wouldn't take the piss out of you. When you do make the occassional (accidental) valid point, people listen, but when every discussion dissolves into strawman arguments and "Yeah but you liked Souness" people do not. You accuse us of being "brainwashed" and "naive" when I'd argue that the opinions of people on here are far more informed than your average "man in a pub" experience. Basically it's not your opinion that is boring, it's you. in your opinion you read a book written by someone sitting in an armchair spouting theories, or you can listen to the views of someone with first hand experience, in a pub or somewhere, face to face. You choose the person sitting in an armchair in comfort spouting theories who lives in an idealistic little world. Like the politicians you take the piss out of, ironically. Fuckwit. And boring. are all books written by people with no first hand experience? has that been your experience? what does the bibliography of the guy next to you at the pub look like? does he provide references of the first hand experience he tells you he's had? just wondering don't you tell us in the UK about politics when you live in Canada ? Fuck off. no, yet another false assertion of yours.

classic, been a few years since i've seen it...got it and the animatrix for $10

Happy Birthday!

right winger ? Not exclusively, only in certain things, which isn't necessarily wrong by the way......... such generalisation only highlights your own limited perspective. Anyway, I also find namby pamby's boring, but I suppose that's different ? I won't bother going into football either, because only a short while ago certain other - we'll call them "opinions" which had no factual base, spouted by many people, were also very boring too. Aren't things "boring" when you don't agree, particularly when all the facts show that your own perspective is bollocks Doddering old fool ? Maybe I think I'm trying to talk to some who are naive brainwashed numpties ? Unsurprisingly, you completely miss the point. no, I don't. Why is it ridiculous ? Because it doesn't suit your view ? It's not your opinion that is invalid, it's your argument. If you came back at those who occupy the counter point to your belief with data and accounts or note, rather than "man in a pub" here-say, people would pay attention. If you would consider other's view point instead concocting a new one for them, people wouldn't take the piss out of you. When you do make the occassional (accidental) valid point, people listen, but when every discussion dissolves into strawman arguments and "Yeah but you liked Souness" people do not. You accuse us of being "brainwashed" and "naive" when I'd argue that the opinions of people on here are far more informed than your average "man in a pub" experience. Basically it's not your opinion that is boring, it's you. in your opinion you read a book written by someone sitting in an armchair spouting theories, or you can listen to the views of someone with first hand experience, in a pub or somewhere, face to face. You choose the person sitting in an armchair in comfort spouting theories who lives in an idealistic little world. Like the politicians you take the piss out of, ironically. Fuckwit. And boring. are all books written by people with no first hand experience? has that been your experience? what does the bibliography of the guy next to you at the pub look like? does he provide references of the first hand experience he tells you he's had? just wondering

right winger ? Not exclusively, only in certain things, which isn't necessarily wrong by the way......... such generalisation only highlights your own limited perspective. Anyway, I also find namby pamby's boring, but I suppose that's different ? I won't bother going into football either, because only a short while ago certain other - we'll call them "opinions" which had no factual base, spouted by many people, were also very boring too. Aren't things "boring" when you don't agree, particularly when all the facts show that your own perspective is bollocks Doddering old fool ? Maybe I think I'm trying to talk to some who are naive brainwashed numpties ? Unsurprisingly, you completely miss the point. no, I don't. Why is it ridiculous ? Because it doesn't suit your view ? It's not your opinion that is invalid, it's your argument. If you came back at those who occupy the counter point to your belief with data and accounts or note, rather than "man in a pub" here-say, people would pay attention. If you would consider other's view point instead concocting a new one for them, people wouldn't take the piss out of you. When you do make the occassional (accidental) valid point, people listen, but when every discussion dissolves into strawman arguments and "Yeah but you liked Souness" people do not. You accuse us of being "brainwashed" and "naive" when I'd argue that the opinions of people on here are far more informed than your average "man in a pub" experience. Basically it's not your opinion that is boring, it's you. ...ooooooh!!

giddy with the anticipation of the coming ski season, snowed last night for the first time in town...snow report listing 85cm at the top of the local hill. the above coupled with a pair of new skis and the first time in 3 years I've had a seasons pass= a smile of cheshire cat proportions....

...fwiw i thought LM had succumbed to immigrant pressure in his neighbourhood, but this was way funnier

She was blessed with a knack for giving bad advice He's got five thumbs on his left hand, five more on his right Well her mom left town with the supermarket clerk but her dad was only jealous 'cause the kid had work and the boy stays home all day 'cause of paranoia He's got kung fu grooves that can never be imitated She's got a fashion queen walk and she wears her blue jeans faded He's got moves with the puck that we've never ever seen, and his girlfriend's 22 and he's just 17 and she gives advice that'll ease your paranoia And we all need someone to save our souls, 'Cause the next time could be mine, could be yours 'Paranoia' Sam Roberts

this thread is hilarious in general.....made my morning two days running...

Happy Birfdeh! i always assumed it was an acronym for something.....N.Y.F.F.

no sign of LM or his apology....comedy gold.

Do you want it in braille? I don't have the power to ban anyone, either here or there man! Maybe try Arabic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_McDonald_House_Charities no RMHC in the UK? just searched it on the RMHC website, there are quite a few in the UK, how is it you've never heard of it before? Hand on heart I'd never heard of it. I had a look through the website and apparently they have one of their Family Rooms at St Oswalds. fair enough, although it probably seems weirder today than it did in 1974 given the bad PR Mickey D's gets for their shit food.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_McDonald_House_Charities no RMHC in the UK? just searched it on the RMHC website, there are quite a few in the UK, how is it you've never heard of it before?

saw this last week as well, guy i work with came up with "a tooth ache" if she/he (because lets face it she's a bit man-ish) had a tooth ache she'd be holding ice or a compress to her head and moaning/talking as she went. what other possibilities are there?

...hope its a good'un.

It wasn't an invasion just to be clear, it was an intervention. I certainly wouldn't consider a failed state run by the Taliban/Al Quaeda a sovereign nation. And yes I tend to lean on the side of intervention where necessary and possible, ie Kosovo, Bosnia, Sierra Leone. you're talking semmantics ....just to be clear. a foreign military entered a country/sovereign state by force and imposed it's will on the then ruling party. Just because you agree with the tactic(s) doesn't mean the reality of the situation is otherwise. What you are talking about is in the realm of propaganda, same as not calling military actions/reprisals 'terrorism' doesn't mean that it's not terrifying for those caught in collateral damage.

The Taliban don't currently rule Afghanistan. Do you still think it's pointless discussing such matters with someone that lacks even the most basic comprehension of facts like that? Thanks to the West. They did in 2001 and you couldn't bring yourself to say intervention was warranted. I doubt you even realised the Taliban had control over the country as in discussion it became clear you had absolutely no comprehension of the recent history of the country. If you had your way, we'd still be living in caves, because you'd be frightened to go out hunting in case a boar was killed in collateral murder. just so i'm clear on what your opinion is....had 9-11 not happened would you have supported the invasion of Afghanistan to rid the Afghans of the Taliban?

tbh...

how old do you think i am?....genuine question

oh, I don't think so. which is what makes you so amusing..