Kevin Carr's Gloves

You are a complete joke. When did the bit in bold occur? If you have no common sense or national awareness, I suggest you just shut the fuck up. As for the signs, none of them are in Punjabi, they are in sylheti (Bangladeshi). When you talk shiet about football, you can get away with it. But here, please just keep quiet. Bangladeshi, Punjabi who gives a fuck, no wonder there's so many racist cunts in London. Muslim fuckin street signs fuck off. As for football you support a team from a city, you've never stepped foot in, in a sport that people from your culture despite having a population have NEVER produced ONE decent footballer, so I suggest you pipe down about that. Baitung Bhutia of Bury, the highest profile player in the history of a country with 1,000,000,000 people. You fucking wet behind the ears twat. As for the bit I've put in bold you little non-entity cunt... SCUM If we could turn back time.... There is much anger in him. No anger at all. Just disappointment at how much England has changed. I think you're a magician, you make 3000 posts full of words and manage to say nothing. I could say I have found your posts full of nothing but bile and ignorance. Is that better? I could also say you cant read or cant count how about that? I could say that you have seemed nothing more than a xenophobe with no idea of history or society how does that sound? Stiil not hearing anything then I suggest in future just ignore my posts and I will try and do the same with yours.

You are a complete joke. When did the bit in bold occur? If you have no common sense or national awareness, I suggest you just shut the fuck up. As for the signs, none of them are in Punjabi, they are in sylheti (Bangladeshi). When you talk shiet about football, you can get away with it. But here, please just keep quiet. Bangladeshi, Punjabi who gives a fuck, no wonder there's so many racist cunts in London. Muslim fuckin street signs fuck off. As for football you support a team from a city, you've never stepped foot in, in a sport that people from your culture despite having a population have NEVER produced ONE decent footballer, so I suggest you pipe down about that. Baitung Bhutia of Bury, the highest profile player in the history of a country with 1,000,000,000 people. You fucking wet behind the ears twat. As for the bit I've put in bold you little non-entity cunt... SCUM If we could turn back time.... There is much anger in him.

There is nothing to support your view that society was better with better moral values and social order at the beginning of the 20th century. There were high levels of crime and drug use from the 19th century up til after the first world war. There were also high levels of crime with commentators of the day complaining about crime families controlling inner city areas. Also you have to consider the actions of government and corporate owners who were quite happy to work people into there graves with little or no reward. The only difference between then and now is the level of media intrusion and the inevitable problems which come from overpopulation. I've bolded the bit where i accepted that this is not something you can say incontrovertibly so your point is well taken. I wouldn't say there was 'nothing to support' the view though. Crime existing at a significant level in the early parts of the 20th century does not indicate that it was at the same level as it is today, nor that it has risen or fallen. I don't think i implied society was better either, i was trying to make a point about social order and contrast the existence of the apparent (according to the media) 'Underclass' today with previous generations and reflect what the elder generations of my family say to me. My Gran is 99 now and as lucid as she was 30 years ago. She would support my view that the 'social constraints' (freedoms in the OP) hardly exist today compared to 100 years ago. I don't doubt that society had many many problems 100 years ago and perhaps you are right, such an underclass may have existed then. It was the time of the great social projects, the rise of Labour and ultimately, once the wars were out of the way, the NHS. These political changes imply a massive amount of poverty and social need. The question at the heart of this is whether presented with the same opportunities that the current generation have, would the people from 100 years ago have embraced the 'benefits' culture or sought to better themselves? It is the problem of grouping the people as some heterogenous (sp) entity. I have no doubt a lot of them would have grabbed it with open arms. But some like today would prefer the sense of achievment that work gives. Although I think there may be something in the lack of achievment the working classes have in work nowadays in the service industry. We are not a creative society anymore. In the past a launching of a ship on the tyne or the clyde would give workers something tangible to aim to. Nowadays who gives a crap how many people can call their friends on their mobile phine. Dont get me wrong I do believe there are some scum out there. You should have seen the looks I got off some catholic friends here in Glasgow when I told them I not only agreed with abortion but thought in some cases it should be compulsory.

You are a complete joke. When did the bit in bold occur? If you have no common sense or national awareness, I suggest you just shut the fuck up. As for the signs, none of them are in Punjabi, they are in sylheti (Bangladeshi). When you talk shiet about football, you can get away with it. But here, please just keep quiet. Doing a paper on the general strike at the moment and after studying his actions for the dardanelles campaign in WWI I must say my opinion of Churchill has dropped dramatically.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british. You would've been as fucked as Iceland. Not according to most economists. Like who? Andrew Hughes Hallett, professor of economics and public policy at George Mason University in Virginia and a visiting professor at St Andrews University for one. Most economists actually meant one economist then? I can't imagine why he'd be biased either. If you want me to name loads of economists who agree with me I can but it may take a while. And all economists are biased depending on who is paying for their advice.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british. You would've been as fucked as Iceland. Not according to most economists. Like who? Andrew Hughes Hallett, professor of economics and public policy at George Mason University in Virginia and a visiting professor at St Andrews University for one.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british. I think even Salmond wouldn't go that far at the moment. He's been very, very specific in his criticism recently (and very, very quiet on other subjects). Aye he has been too quiet. Too much reliance on activate our all conquering database and not on actual campaigning.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british. You would've been as fucked as Iceland. Not according to most economists.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. My how witty and erudite you are.

Fuck off you boring jock cunt. is KCG a member of the SNP I wonder ? Oh aye, he was on here a while back telling us all about how Scotland would be better off with independence. Well that was before their banks went tits up and had to be bailed out by the British government. Which they could have been done by any government scottish or british.

How weird a thread full of people spouting complete shite and it seems to be Stevie and Danny B spouting most of it. That never happens.

There is nothing to support your view that society was better with better moral values and social order at the beginning of the 20th century. There were high levels of crime and drug use from the 19th century up til after the first world war. There were also high levels of crime with commentators of the day complaining about crime families controlling inner city areas. Also you have to consider the actions of government and corporate owners who were quite happy to work people into there graves with little or no reward. The only difference between then and now is the level of media intrusion and the inevitable problems which come from overpopulation.

so glad we didnt get him now. Is there a manager out there really willing to adapt tactics to his squad and admit when they make mistakes and correct them? Or are they all arogant idiots? Is there a manager out there worth having?

A poor imitation of "The Burbs" Or an even poorer imitation of "rear window"?

Aye does anyone have any feeds?

And you're a tramps cheesy cock end.

I now know the true meaning of Schadenfreude.

Papers haven't been in Fleet St for years. I refer you to the post just above yours.

a bit of work there and you could have worked in "her apparent" or summat - try harder next time Or heir apparent even I have no hair apparently.

No wonder everyone thinks you're a moron.

i read a magazine interview with the fm guys and they have the largest football scouting network in the world.

Pure capitalism wont work because it doesnt really exist. It is based on the Adam Smith notion of the invisble hand which is a complete pile of poo.

VB stinks it is one of the worst beers ever. Tastes like grass.

Communism is like an extension of teenage rebellion. Especially if you're middle class. Fascism doesn't seem to have the same wide appeal for some reason. Trotsky is cooler than Stalin though. Aye, it absolutely is, the irony that's it's pretty much the same jackbooted fascism (with different PR) seems to be entirely lost on them. The bigger irony is 99% of them will be working for "the man" a couple of years later and by then will see nothing wrong with it. I blame Hitler personally. You dont know what real communism is do you? Can you give an example of a country in which 'real communism'* has existed for any sustained period of time though? *This would probably need qualifying by you first anyway. No. Real communism has never been sustained at all. I am with Hobsbawm on this in his criticisms of Russia, China and to a certain extent Cuba. Cuba has been damned more by the American blockade than most but I still wouldn't call it communism. Communism is true egalitarianism where everyone gets an equal chance. Where everyone gets the same chances in schooling which would be of the highest standard because the best teachers would be there because they would get as much teaching as any other job. Where the party really does try and fit the best people to the best jobs without the cronyism and fear of past regimes. Unfortunately I dont think true communism could come about in the world today. This is becaquse other countries would try to bring any regime down which would breed paranoia and fear which would lead to a police state and therefore not communism.

Communism is like an extension of teenage rebellion. Especially if you're middle class. Fascism doesn't seem to have the same wide appeal for some reason. Trotsky is cooler than Stalin though. Aye, it absolutely is, the irony that's it's pretty much the same jackbooted fascism (with different PR) seems to be entirely lost on them. The bigger irony is 99% of them will be working for "the man" a couple of years later and by then will see nothing wrong with it. I blame Hitler personally. You dont know what real communism is do you?