NJS

So Mason will say he thought pickford attempted to reach the ball and the whole world will point and laugh. Anf that'll be the end of it. Cunts.

That tackle on Almiron in the first half deserves another lok as well - looked two footed.

I'd love to see the entire team take turns doing a Keown on Van Nistleroy to the ref and/or the Mackem cunt. Everybody else won outside the doomed two though - shit day for Palace.

The argument is not missing what you never really had but nobody can deny the nerve ending loss. A mate of mine had it done at 17 due to phimosis and said wanking wasn't as good without but I dont think he'd had enough sex pre-op to really know if it made that much of a difference.

Germany had a go at talking about bannig male circumcision about five years ago I think and the argument never got as far as mutilation, consent or health - it was just deemed anti-semitic/islamaphobic straight away. Probably not the right country to try like....

Same applies to halal/kosher - legal exemption for traditional barbarism.

I think it was just medically fashionable for decades. They used to argue it prevented penile cancer but that's so rare its not a justification. There was another study a few years ago which suggested it reduced aids infection but it was debunked I think. I'm with Fist - if I started a religion and said I wanted to lop off something a lot less useful like ear lobes I'd be jailed ten seconds after the first op - say its 6000 years old and it's somehow okay.

My first reaction was the judge has been promised a supreme court seat. Judge next week is expected to be harsher - we'll see.

Why? I think if the intention is to give them a say then it may be tokenistic - I think to give them a stake in success its not a bad idea. They've started giving us shares (I also got some when I first joined) but I think its in anticipation of shit bonuses this year - most people including me are selling them as soon as we can to offset said shitness.

He's been very good recently.

I think McDonnell, Watson, Starmer and possibly more are starting to distance themselves from him on a few things - there may be trouble ahead. To be clear I'd welcome the trouble that produces a better leader - as long as the policy platform isn't watered down.

Krul in the same sentence as the other three - what a fucking knacker you are man.

How many people live in Northumberland, you thick fucking idiot?

It still persists - we had a South African lad join our team a couple of weeks ago who asked about brexit and an imbecile on a neighbouring desk chipped in with something about northern scroungers so I told him it was actually his friends, neighbours and relatives who were responsible which seemed to shut him up.

Add snodgrass to that list.

Would love to see someone really hurt that squealing cunt.

That's not what Warsi says.

The thread suggests he tweeted he'd resigned for similar reasons to his wife then was subject to a vote. Might be bollocks I suppose.

Can you not think theres a disgusting amount of anti-semitism in the labour party which should be dealt with and think it's being overused by the media and the powers that be to attack Corbyn? (See how they don't mention Tory racism for example). That Ian Austin said he left because of the anti-semitism but just happens to be a racist brexit supporting cunt as well - a lot of the vocal "Corbyn isn't doing enough" people just also happen to be Blairites who never mentioned the issue before.

I've read quite a few - maybe 30 - Labour MPs won't back it as well though - need to persuade them first I think then move on to others.

To be fair it is/was conference policy - it's just been his reluctance that's been the problem. Still needs tory MP votes though as I keep saying.

Credible leave option plus remain according to advice to MPs from party.

I love this idea that if he'd supported it strongly since the conference it would have happened. There aren't the tory votes for it.

I still think her no deal threat is just an arm twister for her deal - as Starmer has said today.

They did promise - now I'm as cynical as you and think they'd have actually have abolished the top rate of tax instead but I don't remember them objecting to much to what Blair did.