Chemtrails.

[Guest alex]

I blame the Muslims.

[sniffer 0]

Yes, they are a bunch of cunts alright.

[Guest alex]

Takes one to know one.

[Rob W 0]

I blame the Muslims.

 

 

 

:icon_lol:

[Park Life 71]

Also - aloominum ffs.

 

And won't somebody do something about the kids?

 

What a load of shite Parky.

 

Wrong as usual.

[@yourservice 67]

Disabled access is a Dalek conspiracy

[Rob W 0]

Also - aloominum ffs.

 

And won't somebody do something about the kids?

 

What a load of shite Parky.

 

Wrong as usual.

 

 

nice to see you admit it O Great Leader

[Park Life 71]

[Park Life 71]

Edited January 12, 2011 by Park Life

[Park Life 71]

About 6 mins in some congressmen reveal that they are discussing it, but clearly none know it is already happenning...

 

 

[Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1]

The type of people I encounter in real life who believe this stuff and promulgate it (there's only one) are tremendously ignorant. If you want to see the truth, go here http://www.davidicke.com/

Edited January 12, 2011 by Kevin S. Assilleekunt

[Park Life 71]

The type of people I encounter in real life who believe this stuff and promulgate it (there's only one) are tremendously ignorant. If you want to see the truth, go here http://www.davidicke.com/

 

Geoengineering — the concept of deliberately manipulating the earth’s climate system to counteract climate change — made its debut in Congress this week, which I suppose makes it officially “mainstream.”

 

The House’s Committee on Science and Technology held a hearing on geoengineering — the first serious congressional review of the subject, according to committee chairman Rep. Bart Gordon, D-Tenn.

 

An equivalent committee within the UK’s House of Commons will hold similar hearings as part of a partnership with the U.S. Congress.

 

Gordon stressed the hearings should not be misconstrued as an endorsement of any geoengineering activity and its timing was unrelated to pending negotiations in Copenhagen.

[Park Life 71]

US House Subcommittee Examines Geoengineering Strategies and Hazards

5 February 2010

 

The US House Committee on Science and Technology’s Energy and Environment Subcommittee held a hearing to examine the scientific basis and engineering challenges of geoengineering, a term that encompasses a wide range of strategies to deliberately alter the Earth’s climate systems for the purpose of counteracting the effects of climate change.

 

Make no mistake, despite the sometimes far-fetched proposals, this is not a subject that should be taken lightly. As Chairman Gordon has also made clear: geoengineering has been proposed as—and it can only be responsibly discussed as—a last-ditch measure in the case that traditional carbon mitigation efforts prove ineffective on their own. Even then, a tremendous amount of research is required to know what strategies may be worth deploying.

—Chairman Brian Baird (D-WA)

 

Members questioned witnesses about the science, engineering needs, environmental impacts, price, efficacy, and permanence of select geoengineering proposals.

 

Geoengineering strategies fall into two major categories: Solar Radiation Management and Carbon Dioxide Removal. Solar Radiation Management techniques aim to reflect a portion of the sun’s radiation back into space, thereby reducing the amount of solar radiation trapped in Earth’s atmosphere. Types of Solar Radiation Management include: installing reflective surfaces in space; and increasing reflectivity of natural surfaces, built structures, and the atmosphere. Carbon Dioxide Removal aims to reduce excess carbon dioxide concentrations by capturing carbon directly from air and storing it. Carbon Dioxide Removal proposals include such methods as carbon sequestration in biomass and soils, ocean fertilization, modified ocean circulation, non-traditional carbon capture and sequestration in geologic formations, and distributing mined minerals over agricultural soils, among others.

 

Some Solar Radiation Management approaches could be quickly deployed at a relatively low cost and shut down if necessary. Witnesses discussed the low cost as a potential risk in itself, because nations, corporations, or individuals could act unilaterally.

 

Neither Solar Radiation Management nor Carbon Dioxide Removal techniques would eliminate all climate change effects. For example, Solar Radiation Management could block solar radiation, but ocean acidification, the change in ocean chemistry caused when ocean water absorbs excess carbon dioxide, would continue unabated. Ocean acidification reduces the ability of shellfish and corals to form their shells and skeletons, which impacts the health of the entire ocean food chain.

 

Witnesses also strongly emphasized that any type of intervention may carry significant unintended and unknown consequences for ocean ecosystems, agriculture, and the built environment. They emphasized the need for more research to understand potential consequences.

 

This hearing was the second of a three-part series on geoengineering in the Committee on Science and Technology. The series is intended to create the foundation for an informed and open dialogue on the science and engineering of geoengineering. The Full Committee held the first hearing on November 5, 2009, entitled Geoengineering: Assessing the Implications of Large-Scale Climate Intervention. The third hearing is planned for spring 2010 and will cover issues of governance.

 

The series of hearings is part of a partnership with the United Kingdom House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. The two Committees are holding parallel hearings and sharing materials once they are publicly available. The Commons Committee’s hearings and requests for information focus on the domestic and international regulatory frameworks that may be applicable to geoengineering.

 

Resources

 

*

 

Geoengineering II: The Scientific Basis and Engineering Challenges

[OTF 6380]

What are the motives and benefits of those conducting the experimentation with contrails?

 

...and does your tin foil hat heat up on a hot day, or is this not an issue because you don't leave your bunker?

[ToonMarshy 2]

So why haven't the government came out and used this to explain Middlesborough then?

[Dr Gloom 20169]

Smog over a city? Whatever next?

 

quailty thread parky. What's you take on the 9/11 conspiracy theories?

[Kid Dynamite 6091]

 

Another 300 birds dropped dead from the sky. We've now had hundreds of crabs, snapper, birds, and fish drop dead for no apparent reason. The official lines trotted out are starting to get ridiculous with the Russians claiming all the fish got drunk on chemicals and died

[Renton 18051]

Animals die en masse all the time man.

[Guest alex]

50 Jackdaws?

[Park Life 71]

Bloody jackdaws!!

[Guest alex]

Bloody jackdaws!!

Letting the side down tbh

[Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1]

Animals die en masse all the time man.

 

Remember the dinosaurs? I reckon that was chemtrails tbh did them in.

[Guest alex]

Animals die en masse all the time man.

 

Remember the dinosaurs?

Rob does.

[adios 717]

 

Another 300 birds dropped dead from the sky. We've now had hundreds of crabs, snapper, birds, and fish drop dead for no apparent reason. The official lines trotted out are starting to get ridiculous with the Russians claiming all the fish got drunk on chemicals and died

fish getting poisoned sounds preposterous! this is clearly due to a lack of a quantum entanglement device

[Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1]

The conspiracy theorist at my workplace refuses to eat bacon and sausage because it's mass-produced and, 'it could be anything; it looks like bacon, but you don't know what's in it'. He reckons the Americans have a microwave ray-gun that can microwave your insides from a satellite in space. The US government are tainting food sources and putting lots of metal in them so that the microwave gun is more effective against the general populace.

 

He's always banging on about chemtrails. Daft cunt. This is the one that thinks North Korea and Iran are more open and free societies than the UK and that anyone who disagrees with him has been brainwashed by 'BBC propoganda'.