Jump to content

FAO Christmas Tree


Ketsbaia
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

^_^ CT is PUMPED. He's blasting out Phil Collins and doing a victory jig after he scythed down Gemmill like a machete through warm cheese.

 

;)

 

Thought I'd clipped on mumsnet by mistake :)

 

its just words on a screen, ffs this place is getting like lord of the flies :rolleyes:

 

Lord of the Flies is just words on a page.

 

precisely, so why take seriously the opinions of a bloke you've never met and probably wouldnt enjoy sharing a pint with?...I don't get it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CT fully well knows that everything gets derailed by him but that's all he wants tbh.

 

 

Just one or two fucking examples ffs :) I've even given you a full three week time slot. ^_^

 

Yee kna full well. Renton's just posted one from the politics thread and the Twitter thread became your little station because everyone was sick of your patter. There's nee point anyway since when Happy Face dragged up some quotes to tuck you, you just responded with some mock indignation and a couple of ";)" smilies like butter wouldn't melt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^_^ CT is PUMPED. He's blasting out Phil Collins and doing a victory jig after he scythed down Gemmill like a machete through warm cheese.

 

;)

 

Thought I'd clipped on mumsnet by mistake :)

 

its just words on a screen, ffs this place is getting like lord of the flies :rolleyes:

 

Lord of the Flies is just words on a page.

 

precisely, so why take seriously the opinions of a bloke you've never met and probably wouldnt enjoy sharing a pint with?...I don't get it...

 

It was a joke. Fwiw, I actually don't take them seriously, for the reasons I've mentioned.

 

I'm not going to direct any vitriol his way and I don't think I ever have (CT can correct me if I'm wrong), but at the same time it's cloud cuckoo land for anyone posting some of the stuff he comes out with not to expect an adverse reaction at a time when the club is in such a delicate balance. If it was backed up by common sense then fair enough, but that's my point, largely it isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since when was 2 an impressive range?

 

Fuck me CT, has the Mrs. Been adding ethanol to your baileys?

 

^_^

 

And CT, while Stevie agrees with your point about Enrique, he basically states he thinks that you're a WUM. Which is basically what's at the heart of the OP rather than the isolated opinion you express in the Enrique thread.

 

It's not about opinions, it's about motives for expressing those opinions. And the reason you're getting flack is because people suspect your motives (ie you're on a wind up). Tbf, the way you overlook Ashley's track record of dishonesty and swallow the club line verbatim each time, the only conclusion is that you're a wum or a simpleton.

 

You basically provide the other end of the spectrum to Leazes. And people have stopped posting to him too for broadly similar reasons.

 

Im sorry like, but this is the usual scenario on here. I give a genuine opinion on something, the lynch mob come out, others agree, the lynch mob depart.

 

And then people trot out crap like "motives / on the wind up" when its usually just a genuine opinion that others also share.

 

Then we have the "swallow the club line verbatim each time" which again as in this instance is bollocks as my Enrique remarks where all about the player and as far as Im aware, the club havent issued any "line". (I thought you were a legal eagle. :) ).

 

Then theres the old Ashley sympathiser line. That basically boils down to one extreme that hopes he burns in hell regardless of whatever happens at NUFC. Theres another side that wishes we had Shepherd with Ashleys money but as that isnt the case, understand that having a financial solid base is not only needed today, but could stand us in good stead going forward.

 

Again I am in pretty good poster company on that argument.

 

We have the "he derails / spoils every thread" line. Again bollocks. I add an opinion like I did last night and all hell kicks off. Not my fault if people over react to a very legitimate opinion.

 

I challenge anyone to go and list a few threads from the last week / fortnight that I have ruined by wummery. I'll wait. I mean, if its stopping grown men from posting there must be hundreds.

 

I mean if Im like Leazes there must be at least 20 or so a week.

 

I would be suprised if theres one.

 

I rest my case.... Innocent til proven guilty......

 

The thing is, if your opinions are offered genuinely, then that points down the simpleton route, as there are plenty of occasions where they have been shown to be contradictory. The fact that you don't see the contradiction and put forward conflicting statements can be just as grating as if you were a wum.

 

I'm happy to accept the point that you're an optimist, so you are going to actively look for a positive angle on things, but to be so wildly optimistic as you come across in the context of the Ashley saga basically requires a suspension of your critical faculties.

 

Whatever you say above, you do regurgitate the club line more than anyone. I'm the last person to go on the sort of 'Ashley apologist' witch hunts that you see on here so I don't accept you trying to reduce my point to that, but as a simple matter of fact, without using that sort of emotive language, typically you are inclined to wilfully believe whatever line the club trots out.

 

It basically is just Leazes but from the other end of the spectrum. A complete suspension of critical faculties while you pursue your agenda. Be that as a wum or a totally delusional optimist-cum-simpleton.

 

 

So in a nutshell you couldnt find one ruined thread by me, not one.

 

Perhaps Ketsbaia or Gemmil or Renton etc will list some of those ruined threads from the last few weeks, it must be easy if Im like Leazes. ;)

 

Doubt they will though..... :rolleyes:

 

It''d be easier to find a thread which hasn't been ruined by your participation. The point where I finally started censoring your posts, with the exception of this thread which is specifically about you, was when you claimed, with your great insightful knowledge as a taxi driver, that no-one you know has been affected by the government cuts. This coming just days after I effectively lost my job because of them. Of course it was then pointed out that another poster (sorry, forget who, trophyshy?) and his girlfriend had lost his job and you actually knew all about this.

 

Two things I'd like to point out at this point. I'm not being party political here as it could just as well hppaened under Labour, and I'm not saying that things won't actually work out for me or the other poster and his g/f. But basically it just showed you up to a massive cunt. I can just about be Ok with your cretinous opinions and lack of knowledge, but I simply can't abide a person from the North East who has no empathy for other people regarding these types of matters.

 

I think one of your first posts on here was you bragging about earning £70,000 per year as a taxi driver. Remember that? Just about sums you up.

 

Same challenge to you.....last three weeks or so... go get one.. put up or shut up. :)

 

I've just given you two examples of you being a complete dick. I can't give you a more recent one because I don't read your posts any more. You must have the skin of an elephant btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^_^ CT is PUMPED. He's blasting out Phil Collins and doing a victory jig after he scythed down Gemmill like a machete through warm cheese.

 

;)

 

Thought I'd clipped on mumsnet by mistake :)

 

its just words on a screen, ffs this place is getting like lord of the flies :rolleyes:

 

Lord of the Flies is just words on a page.

 

precisely, so why take seriously the opinions of a bloke you've never met and probably wouldnt enjoy sharing a pint with?...I don't get it...

 

It was a joke. Fwiw, I actually don't take them seriously, for the reasons I've mentioned.

 

I'm not going to direct any vitriol his way and I don't think I ever have (CT can correct me if I'm wrong), but at the same time it's cloud cuckoo land for anyone posting some of the stuff he comes out with not to expect an adverse reaction at a time when the club is in such a delicate balance. If it was backed up by common sense then fair enough, but that's my point, largely it isn't.

 

Indeed, whenever Chez posts against the grain, he does so using some knowledge, considered arguments and some consistent opinions and he doesn't get anyone's ire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a fan of the 'no ban' policy and freedom on the forum. The only reason CT affects the forum in any way is because of the way people react to him. Most of you are grown men, you should be able to cope with what is essentially a slightly irritating bloke.

 

Not sure if you're being serious but either way, I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a fan of the 'no ban' policy and freedom on the forum. The only reason CT affects the forum in any way is because of the way people react to him. Most of you are grown men, you should be able to cope with what is essentially a slightly irritating bloke.

 

I can't, I'm literally a child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, CT doesn't resort to barbaric insults like most people do when behind a keyboard. We have all ripped on him for his obesity and so on, but he would never resort to something like Rob calling out Leazes after the Oslo massacre. That patter was just dire ^_^

 

I'll give him that 100% and that's why I'll not sling shit his way on a personal level. And tbf, despite the parallels with Leazes I mentioned earlier, on that particular point he's the complete antithesis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Renton, you said you find CT actually offensive. ^_^ That's rediculous. If you are interested in discussing politics and have such strong feelings about it, you should see someone like CT as a chance to absolutely obliterate someone in discourse. If you can't do that in a coherent and convincing way then I could see how you'd end up getting so annoyed by him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorely tempted to ban CT just for the sheer fucking hell of it. Justify my actions? Erm... no thanks :)

 

Besides it'll cheer up 99.7% of the board and for a Monday that can't be wrong. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a fan of the 'no ban' policy and freedom on the forum. The only reason CT affects the forum in any way is because of the way people react to him. Most of you are grown men, you should be able to cope with what is essentially a slightly irritating bloke.

 

Not sure if you're being serious but either way, I agree.

 

I'm being sincere. From my perspective, he's just a bloke who I happen to disagree with on the vast majority of things. We are nothing alike. He would never spend 25 minutes giving cunnilingus to a horrific asian woman, for instance. I would never put on Phil Collins and cry at films like Titanic. If you react so strongly to someone expressing an opinion you disagree with, perhaps you harbour a fascist impulse. I personally believe in freedom of expression, so he's well within his rights imo.

 

Also, despite all these things I mentioned, he's not a belligerent violent man. I've been around some unpleasant people like that, and I'd much rather have to be around the likes of CT than them. There's no harm in him.

Edited by Kevin S. Assilleekunt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Renton, you said you find CT actually offensive. ^_^ That's rediculous. If you are interested in discussing politics and have such strong feelings about it, you should see someone like CT as a chance to absolutely obliterate someone in discourse. If you can't do that in a coherent and convincing way then I could see how you'd end up getting so annoyed by him.

 

aka Renton is a bit of a whiny bitch :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a fan of the 'no ban' policy and freedom on the forum. The only reason CT affects the forum in any way is because of the way people react to him. Most of you are grown men, you should be able to cope with what is essentially a slightly irritating bloke.

 

I'd go along with this like. Part of what makes him so bad is the reaction he gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a fan of the 'no ban' policy and freedom on the forum. The only reason CT affects the forum in any way is because of the way people react to him. Most of you are grown men, you should be able to cope with what is essentially a slightly irritating bloke.

 

I'd go along with this like. Part of what makes him so bad is the reaction he gets.

 

And before anyone says I've reacted to him in this thread, the trousers like a cloth egg cup line was too good not to go public with. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say I'd think quite a lot less of this place if he was banned - I can't understand how anyone can want to stop someone from posting just because they think he's wrong - whether that's plain wrong or WUM/being a prick wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.