toonotl 3743 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago It’s maybe fair to say he didn’t do enough to establish a body of work one way or another. But that in itself makes him seem like a bit of a fraud when he keeps taking a position that is in essence about the long term and doesn’t stay for long enough to be judged based on the tangible outcomes of his performance. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 19903 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Yeah the whole point of this sort of job is to create long term football policy and procedures so that you don’t end up being like Man Utd with no long term vision ie sacking every useless bastard they appoint after 18 months and having to pay off all their staff but being lumbered with the eye wateringly expensive useless bastards that they’ve signed…. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 5624 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 7 hours ago, Rayvin said: Am I alone in thinking that for all he's a bastard, he was actually pretty good? The idea of a sporting director or a DoF is that its meant to be a long term, continuity focussed job where you stay in position for a long time. Instead he fucked us off after 18 months and then lasted 5 months at man u. Its impossible to say that he did a good job at either because he wasn't around long enough to have done one, but by virtue of that I reckon its fair to say he did a bad job or a main facet of his position. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2521 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Fucked over Brighton and us and then got sacked by Jim Rat King. I assume his reputation has been torched by his own behaviour, but if I were the FA I would view him as a short term appointment 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 38070 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Kitman said: Fucked over Brighton and us and then got sacked by Jim Rat King. I assume his reputation has been torched by his own behaviour, but if I were the FA I would view him as a short term appointment He’s got a very questionable record at the FA iirc. Wasn’t he embroiled in some scandal there previously? That’s along with Allardyce being his recommendation for the England job 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 34589 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago The FA job will be much more low key for him. No one had heard of him when he last did the same role and it'll be the same again. With England the entire responsibility for the senior teams' performances belong to the managers so he can sit quietly being a rat in the background. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2521 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 59 minutes ago, Alex said: He’s got a very questionable record at the FA iirc. Wasn’t he embroiled in some scandal there previously? That’s along with Allardyce being his recommendation for the England job Allardyce that must have been embarrassing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 12823 Posted 48 minutes ago Share Posted 48 minutes ago 11 hours ago, Rayvin said: Am I alone in thinking that for all he's a bastard, he was actually pretty good? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now