ewerk

Sounded to me like Levy doesn't want to keep unhappy players, I'd expect them to go for much less.

1-0 down.

And turn 18 mil expediture into 50mil? I would be more worried about the strengthening we could do with that kind of dough. £50m? You'd be very, very lucky to get that.

They are allowed to run companies again after a certain period of time, some of the most successful business men out there have previously been declared bankrupt so your analogy doesn't stand up. A lifetime ban for being caught once is unduly harsh imo, it doesn't allow for the fact that he may genuinely regret his actions and unfairly bans him from showing his talent on the biggest stage. He has done wrong, he has served his ban but to continue punishing him is completely unfair. Should ex-cons never be allowed a job? Should anyone who has done wrong never be forgiven?

Reasonably strong side out: TEAMS HUFC: Arran Lee-Barrett, Jamie McCunnie, Ritchie Humphreys, Antony Sweeney, Ben Clark, Sam Collins ©, Gary Liddle, Ritchie Jones, James Brown, Joel Porter, Matty Robson Subs: Andy Monkhouse, Jonny Rowell, Michael Mackay, Richard Barker, Alan Power, Michael Nelson, Willie Boland, Jan Budtz, David Foley NUFC: Shay Given, David Edgar, Jose Enrique, Steven Taylor, Claudio Cacapa, Damien Duff, James Milner, Nicky Butt ©, Charles N'Zogbia, Oba Martins, Alan Smith Subs: Fraser Forster, Danny Guthrie, Shola Ameobi, Frank Wiafe Danquah, BenTozer, Callum Morris, Mark Doninger, Jonny Godsmark, Darren Lough http://www.nufc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsD...1347189,00.html

As much as I don't like to see players being tapped up, how hilarious would it be to see Spurs lose their first choice strike partnership?

So anyone who commits a crime or does wrong shouldn't get a second chance? He has served his time and shown remorse for what he has done, he should have been allowed to go imo. No, I'm not saying that. Anyone who commits a crime and admits it should not then have the arrogance to claim that it's against their rights to send them to prison (for instance) He knew the risks and shouldn't think that the rules should be changed for him. As for competing in the future in other events - he'll be allowed to do so because he's 'served his time' That doesn't mean I have to like it, personally. He has served his ban (been to prison), it's more like sending him to prison and then refusing to let him out.

So anyone who commits a crime or does wrong shouldn't get a second chance? He has served his time and shown remorse for what he has done, he should have been allowed to go imo.

Dear God no!

ENIC is owned by Joe Lewis, one of the richest men in Britain, the only surprise is that they have never splashed the cash before. He's worth considerably more than Ashley as well.

He's reluctant to move to a Championship side so I doubt the thought of League 1 football excites him too much.

Because we'd have no hope of getting him?

£60k, or possibly something a bit lower with performance related pay to take it up should he be doing well.

We've been rejected AGAIN.

Much rather they get Chimbonda than us.

Sadly it's too true, though as you say other clubs wouldn't have got the attention we have. Still, six weeks left.

no just thought i would gloat how stupid u were especially YOU to your rivals Tell us? Not proud of the team you follow? well if i wasn't proud if i supported these i'd commit suicide Sorta pisses on your username, doesn't it? Weren't you supposed to be a toon fan when you started? it is to take the mick out of your stupid fanticy land newcastle top four geordies FUCK OFF your mid table at best just because you had a fluke season and beat man u 5-1 once which they did to you last season and managed to win the league and been consistent, consisent and newcastle, now there's two thing i would not expect in the same sentance Do you simply take letters and type them at random?

***THERE WILL BE BLOOD: SPOILER*** From the Times 'The End II: the worst movie endings ever' http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol...t=12&page=2 Completely agree. :tinhat:

'U'? I thought it was 'we'?

No, you said we weren't after Aimar, we were but he chose Benfica over us. Please try again.

From that journo on the BR forum:

Meh, they all look the...

Not sure where that last bit comes from. Unless you're on about him being injury-prone. I don't see the relevance anyway as it's about your knowledge rather than your own physical fitness, strictly speaking. He might not be the best man for the job but I do share Wacky's sentiments and I'd rather have him than the 'non-football' people Allardyce was so keen on. Plus, I don't think Keegan necessarily has the final say on this sort of appointment in the way he would have in the past. And I don't think Ashley would give a bloke a job just because he used to play for us. You say it yourself, you'd rather him than "non-football" people. I'd assume that was because non-football people wouldn't have the applicable knowledge from actual experiences. In the same way I'd rather Gary Speed was a fitness coach than Robbie Elliot. He has got or is currently getting a degree in sports science so I imagine that's part of the reason he got the job.