ewerk

The majority don't give a fuck, hence why the only people whinging are generally the banned minority.

Possibly the only semi-interesting thing he has ever done in his life. What a boring twat.

Emphysema is bound to fuck her up unless she starts taking her health seriously and without her voice she's just another crack junkie, it may be the kick up the arse that she needs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7470415.stm

So why don't you tell us something interesting about your life? Something that isn't complete fiction.

I disagree, I honestly believe that the man's ego is so great that he genuinely believes that he did nothing wrong, much in the same way that Shola genuinely believes that he is a PL standard footballer.

Who exactly is to blame for it then? And speaking in the third person? Well you'll never see ewerk doing that.

They start off by saying that the press are reporting that we're looking to cut wages and then go on to say that in the past we've given big money to mediocre players and 'trophy signings' and then finish with the fact that we need new players in. Not the best written or most insightful piece in the world but what they say is true. I agree it's true. But they end by saying we need loads of players, they can't have both clearly. For me it is imperative we compete in the market and take the financial pain now for the 2/3 first teamers that would make a difference. The cost cutting which looks to have started well won't show real benefits for a couple of years...There is no way we can tread water for that long. That should be one of the benefits of having a super-rich owner. As you say, if we invested substantial sums in the right players now we could get back into Europe which would of course increase income and make us more attractive to potential signings. As a business this is a big risk and you only have to look at Leeds to see how they got it wrong but we have a safety net of a billionaire, though whether he is prepared to take that risk remains to be seen.

They start off by saying that the press are reporting that we're looking to cut wages and then go on to say that in the past we've given big money to mediocre players and 'trophy signings' and then finish with the fact that we need new players in. Not the best written or most insightful piece in the world but what they say is true.

start using some of the young players weve brought in over the last year or so. whats the point in having them if your not going to use them. villa have a small squad iirc The idea for the kids is to develop them over a period of time, not just throw them straight into the first team altogether. Assuming that Ameobi is going that leaves us with just 17 players with any significant first team experience so your plan to get rid of 6 first team players is ridiculous.

You still haven't explained how we're going to operate with a squad of around 18 players.

... First off Given Zogz and Martins rubbish? Second we've been linked with Guthrie more than anyone so I think our thoughts are a little lower than Arshavin. Bit of a dreamer aren't you lad? Don't feed the WUM. what your irish? go support a team in your own country Must try harder. must try harder? im not trying to wind you up. it just annoys me when people like you make comments about newcastle when you shouldnt even support them Still not good enough I'm afraid.

no my point is get rid of the 5-6 players i mentioned any replace them with 3 or so players that can actually play football using the money gained from the sales And have a squad of 18 players. Genius.

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12874_2948442,00.html Pity that at the time we were still in the process of our 'strategic review'.

... First off Given Zogz and Martins rubbish? Second we've been linked with Guthrie more than anyone so I think our thoughts are a little lower than Arshavin. Bit of a dreamer aren't you lad? Don't feed the WUM. what your irish? go support a team in your own country Must try harder.

... First off Given Zogz and Martins rubbish? Second we've been linked with Guthrie more than anyone so I think our thoughts are a little lower than Arshavin. Bit of a dreamer aren't you lad? Don't feed the WUM.

On the plus side at least it appears that our new scouting network had identified these players before the tournament, not that it does us much good now that the world and his wife knows about them.

Assuming that our reported interested in him before the Euros was genuine then we really should've went all out to sign him then.

A referee sending a player off then changing his mind? Fair play to him, right decision in the end but unfortunately you wouldn't have seen anything like that in the PL.

What a complete and utter prick.

Well that was a decent end to the game.

That's got fuck all to do with it, they are the sort of FIRST TEAM PLAYERS we're going for What matters is what who we're able to put on the pitch next season.

How many of them have we signed?

That is why we need a dual track policy with an emphasis on first team players IMO. As far as I know that's exactly what we've got I don't think you can say that until we start to see a few quality first teamers coming in. I can say that and I did Well what have you seen to indicate that we've got any sort of emphasis on the first team?