ewerk

The funny thing is that most of them seem to be genuinely upset about receiving the PMs.

A simple yes or no would suffice Meenz! Well, discombobulating the diametric hypothesis would serve to extrapolate the underlying ectoplasmic dodecahedron and frankly they're both shite.

Few drinks in a few pubs tonight, nothing to report other than foreigners are funny. That is all.

Both fake as fuck tbh.

Yup, not much wrong with any of those choices.

ive just found this 30 second clip of this supposed video, was it a close up of her giving a bj? Aye that's the one.

There was a clip floating about claiming to be her but I've seen the extended version and its not. There's a video on Youtube of Federline filming her but unfortunately she's doing nothing more exciting than eating and burping.

Never heard of it before but after reading up on it it sounds very disturbing.

Bobby if they're going to be shit then at least keep them short

Even if he is found guilty I doubt the wee cunt will be sent down.

Gummo, I remember watching that years ago at about 4am on TV after a night on the piss. Strange and ultimately boring film but I couldn't turn it off and remember thinking afterwards "what the fuck was that all about then?".

Being friends with her is highly unlikely to work out, I've been in the same situation as the chick and I'm not particularly proud of it. Either tell her straight that you want nothing more to do with her or fuck her, pull out and shoot your load in a circlular motion around her face then crack her full fisted on the nose so it gushes blood and you have yourself a jelly doughnut and one less thing to worry about.

She's a cheating skank, if she's going to do it on him what is there to say she wouldn't cheat on you if yous were together?

thats a sympathy smilie.

Were they not aware that there was a bit of a row going on in Northern Ireland at the time?

She certainly would have got it when she looked like she did in the old pic. Now she looks like a tranny sailor.

I'm not sure what the practice is but they should try and find them some sort of employment whether it be within the army or another government agency, its certainly preferable to them being on benefits.

According to the Express its not a front for anyone, unfortunately.

How about if you're on a bus coming back to barracks and some tim c*nt blows it up? Thanks for that intelligent contribution to the discussion. About as intelligent as yours. I'm offering my opinion while you've resorted to religious/political slurs, are you sure you're not Michael Richards? Obviously it is undesirable for both the individual and society for them to be on benefits for the rest of their life and an effort should be made to find them a suitable job within the army. We're talking about the extremes here, my main point was more directed towards those people who were shot or injured in another way but go on to make full recoveries and can return to work.

It is very unfortunate that that does happen but as I have already said they will be aware of that risk when they sign up. Should it have happened due to faulty/or lack of equipment then they certainly should be entitled to compensation but if not then its simply an occupational hazard, albeit a very serious one.

How about if you're on a bus coming back to barracks and some tim c*nt blows it up? Thanks for that intelligent contribution to the discussion.

Its all about the blame culture that has developed in this country, its never the individual's fault. If you are injured in the line of duty then you should accept that this is what you signed for.

I did assume he was a Northern Irish Catholic like, from what I've gleaned in the past and I thought that, in relation to this, he was making an emotional response. As am I, I suppose, although I'm not denying it. My response certainly is influenced by being a Northern Irish Catholic but not in relation to the army. Its the whole culture of people expecting something for nothing that I detest, "I got shot in battle", "I tripped on a paving stone", "I can't get a job" etc etc. People always want someone else to look after them and don't take responsibility, I'm sure that this won't go down well on a Newcastle board but Thatcher was right when she said its all about the individual and people need to stand on their own two feet and take responsibility. Being a Northern Irish Catholic I can see the results of people who have employed this tactic successfully out of neccessity because they got nothing handed to them. Without wanting to sound like my area has the monopoly on hard times my experience of my own family and people I know has shown me how far hard work can get you without relying on the government and others to help. So the army isn't the only route for those with no qualifications and should they choose this route they shouldn't expect a hand out when they get injured in the line of duty.

I think you'll agree that your example of being an astronaut is equally as moronic as my motorway one. You are making it sound like some kids' only choices are the army or the dole? There are other options for employment if people work hard enough and want to improve themselves but the army seems like the most obvious route for people with little prospects. If people want to make a success of themselves then there are other routes than the army. Again that is the risk they take, they put their lives in others' hands.

I think the problem is that I'm looking at it in black and white while the rest of you are perhaps bringing emotion into it. Many of you may have had grandparents who fought in the war and this sense of "our boys, out there protecting us and serving our country" while I look at it as any other job which people choose of their own free will. I do honestly believe that people should not be doubly compensated for getting injured in the course of their work where the risk is abundantly clear, I know many of them earn a pittance but that is what they agreed to. Or maybe I'm just talking bollocks.