Jimbo

*cough* Check out who's listed as one of the writers.... http://imdb.com/title/tt0082971/ Craig's been whooshed

Sounds like a shite name, almost as bad as "The Phantom Menace", thank god George Lucas has fuck all to do with Indiana Jones..........

Superb result for Scotland tonight too.

Good job Lamps is injured eh ?

I want a Zhirkov shirt.

Wooooo

Arctic Monkeys - Love Machine

The operative word being 'could'. It quite easily 'could not' as well. If it IS key then it is news..... at the moment its conjecture Let me get this straight, you don't think the chief prosecutor requesting that the judge make an emergency seizure order is worthy of reporting in the news ??

The outcome of the request of the seizure of his item could be the key moment in this investigation and might quicken the discovery of a body if there is one.

Seems perfectly news-worthy in my opinion.

Judge Asked For Emergency Order Updated: 22:54, Tuesday September 11, 2007 The public prosecutor in Portugal is reported to have asked the judge in the Madeleine McCann case to make an emergency order allowing him to seize a mystery object. It is not known what or where the object is but the prosecutor has asked the judge to issue an order allowing him to have it within 24 hours. Sky News crime correspondent Martin Brunt said: "The prosecution has asked the judge for an emergency order to give them permission to go and seize it. "We do not know where or what it is, whether it is in this country or whether it is something perhaps the McCann family are refusing to hand over." Earlier, the prosecutor decided that a dossier outlining the case against missing Madeleine McCann's parents should go before a judge. Police handed their files to the Algarve-based prosecutor, Jose Cunha de Magalhaes e Meneses, for him to decide whether to bring charges against Kate and Gerry McCann. Speaking outside the prosecutor's office in Portimao, Luisa Duarte said Mr Cunha de Magalhaes e Meneses had received the papers and decided they should go before an instructional judge. The development could mean the couple may find out in the next 10 days whether they will be charged with their daughter's death. Alternatively, it may be that the prosecutor is asking for stricter bail conditions, another round of questioning of the McCanns or fresh searches. But the file, which was only handed to the prosecutor by police on Tuesday, was not expected to be passed on so quickly. "That's a pretty dramatic development because it shows the prosecutor is moving quickly," said Brunt. "The prosecutor has already decided there is enough evidence for the file to go to the judge and it will now be up to the judge to see whether there is enough evidence to file charges. "In the next 10 days the McCanns could find out if they are to be brought back here to be charged with Madeleine's death." Portugal's attorney-general, who oversees the public prosecutor's office, said that officials would examine police findings and announce within 10 days what further steps would be taken. "The investigation ... is not over, and further detective work is required," Attorney-General Fernando Pinto Monteiro said in a written statement. It is also reported that he has appointed a second public prosecutor to oversee the investigation. Meanwhile, bodily fluids - not blood - matching Madeleine McCann's DNA have been found in the car hired by her parents, according to sources. The sample was taken from the boot, where the spare tyre is kept. It had an 88% match with the missing four-year-old's DNA, sources said. Police searching the car also found so much of Madeleine's hair that it could not have been transferred from a blanket or clothes. It must have come directly from her body, sources said. The information came from senior sources in the investigation who briefed Portuguese journalists. It follows last night's revelation by Sky News that detectives had found DNA evidence that Madeleine's body had been in the boot of the car hire by Mr and Mrs McCann five weeks after their daughter's disappearance. Brunt said: "The Portuguese press reports have been reasonably accurate in reflecting what's going on in the thoughts, and the direction, of detectives. "It sounds like what we reported last night is being born out." Mr and Mrs McCann are enduring the tense wait for news at their home in Rothley, Leicestershire. Both have been named by police as suspects in their daughter's disappearance on May 3 in the Algarve. Family spokesman Brian Kennedy, who is Madeleine's great uncle, said of the family: "They are holding up extremely well."

I first started walking to school when I was about 8 years old, only years later did my mum admit she used to follow me at a distance to make sure I got there safe.

Christ almighty.

agreed however wrong, stupid or evil they maybe.

I think most people that heard the news as it very first broke didn't understand the severity of the attack.

I remember my Mrs telling me about the news as it broke, I thought it was just some twat in a small light-aircraft who got too close, only when I switched SKY News on did the full horror of the situation hit me, litterally spent the rest of the day glued to the TV.

If you're being watched by someone intent of abducting a child (i think it's fair to assume that it most likely wasn't a moment of opportunism) then it doesn't matter if your back is turned for 2 minutes or 20 - once it's turned, they'll make their move. Its the moral high ground issue. We all (and i'm talking about parents up and down the country) can sit here and say "there's no way I'd have left my kids in that situation" and as Gemmill pointed out, I'm as guilty as anyone for saying it but looking at it rationally: 1) We're saying it with the benefit of hindsight (what a wonderful thing that is and I bet the McCanns wish they'd had the opportunity) 2) It is totally impossible to watch you kids for every single moment of their life I don't see what the argument is, leaving children alone either in your own home or in a holiday appartment is completely inexcusable. It's not a moral high-ground point of view, there is simply no argument for their actions regardless of the outcome of this tragedy

Contrast that with this: ....from page 1 and 2 of this thread. Oh I know - ironically i'd just re-read that all myself. I still maintain that there is no justification for it and I personally wouldn't have left my kids. My big irk is with the fact that people are getting at the McCann's because they were "living it up" while they'd left their kids when in reality, what they were actually doing at the time of the abduction shouldn't make an ounce of difference. Like I said, morally they've fucked up, but had Madeleine not disappeared, would we be berating them? Would we fuck! If Maddie had not "dissappeared" we wouldn't know about the incident. would we ?

I'm not getting this comparision between "I'll just take my eyes off my kids for a second" and "Lets go out for drinkies and leave the kids alone"

I'll wag the finger, what they did was simply inexcusable regardless of the hindsight of the abduction, I would never leave my children unattended under any circumstances. Seriously Jimbo, have you never left the kids in the house and popped out to get something out of the car? I don't leave them unattended.

Every league club has a "World TV" on their website, and they featuring live commentary, match highlights and shitty interviews. But it would be a real upgrade if they would make some old games available, and god forbid they would hire some pundits who would talk a half an hour about our next match and put it on .cock 1 or 2 days before the match. Agreed, and a proper TV channel would be even better[/armchairfan]

I think its only human nature to react in that manner, previous generations have no-doubt done the same, the Kennedy assasination being one example.

Newcastle World TV has been around for years on .cock.