adios

Any truth in the rumour that arguing with Leazes is to be introduced as an official sport at the next Special Olympics?

No.

See, no interest, just looking for an easy wind-up. You'll have to try a lot fucking harder while the Roedent is running things at Newcastle.

I can explain the difference to you, if you'd like.

That's exactly how I feel, I would just feel wrong watching them, though I'm not judging anyone else for doing so. Regarding the last highlight, the only thing I would say is, people are still making money from these movies, unless all the profits are going to the victim's families? Which I would be happy to hear. In the last week I've watched: Silent Hill - Not as bad as I expected, I think it's based on the second game, as I played a bit of that and I recognised parts of it up until the school. It has brilliantly recreated the game, some of the frames were instantly recognisable, kudos for that; but it fails to replicate the game in one pretty key area, it's not very scary, when the game scared the shit out of me. I seriously don't know if I'd play that game alone, it's as scary as Resident Evil (the game) was supposed to be. I did like the underlying message, so overall, glad I watched it. Final Destination 3 - Usual fare (ho ho), I enjoyed it. It's not gone stale on the third installment, the new director (who also did the original Saw) probably helped. Thank you for Smoking - Fantastic movie, I laughed a lot, Rob Lowe's character in particular was fucking hilarious, I don't think I stopped laghing while he was on screen.

I think you've taken it the wrong way, the digital frame looks nice.

I just think buying a gift for a loved one should hurt you financially, really mean something. You have a decent enough job, a grand would only be a month and a half of the rent you're not paying. Send them on a sun holiday. I don't know your parents, so you'd probably think of something far more fitting, but the money does count; when you get someone something literally breathtaking, that is priceless.

Don't you stay in their house rent free? Could you splash a bit more?

prus.

Is she hot?

Never feckin' had it tbqftai.

I bet the pope loves a good cunting.

You looked at it and weren't sure it was wrong? Piece of mind is right, Scatt! Anyway... WHEEEE! WHEEEEE!

You people DISGUST me! I should be safe because my keyboard and mouse are wireless, but I'm off to wash them, just in case.

<------ -----> Twins.

I saw a doc yesterday afternoon which was spot on with everything the showed last night. There was no mention of a PES demo on that though. You can go download the con presentation from xbox.com. Worth it for the Assasins Creed walkthrough. I watched that last night; looks pretty impressive, no?

Perfect opportunity for a spot of unplanned willie-watching, Shirley? You might be surprised at how un-erotic a flaccid, mid-stream cock is. Love it up you though! Mid stream?

"When I need help washing my hands I'll go to a fucking home, thank you." tbh.

Any idea if the rest of that was true, then? Would love to see a PES demo.

Renton has just brought something FILTHY to my attention. Do you wash you hands after going to the toliet? Own up you dirty, DIRTY people!

LP's prices could be from that "leaked" X06 document, which may be fake. I hope not, because it said we'd have a Pro Evo 6 demo on marketplace by tomorrow evening.

How do you tell them apart without a precise and explicit code of conduct applied accross the board? The right to remain silent must be about as old and set in stone as the theory of innocent until proven guilty. Would you prefer to erode the human rights of everyone to to ensure someone...anyone was convicted of every crime? The right to silence is relatively new actually. It was brought in to stop people accused of one thing from being asked to tell the police everything they had done wrong. It isn't about civil rights. If you have been asked about something you have done you should have to tell the police / authorities. Same as I don't believe in a criminals right to private conference with his lawyer either. Oh, and I thougt the principle "nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare" was quite old, but you are right it wasn't known among the Neanderthals... Just cos it's in Latin doesn't make it old. You can translate anything into latin. Yep, especially those nice do-gooders and civil right activists in the middle ages could. That's why it is found in loads of medieval legal text books. The right to own slaves was quite old too but we thought that was wrong. Just because anything is old doesn't mean it is good and proper. So let me get this right. It is ok for a person to stay silent about a murder or any criminal act they have witnessed or taken part in because to say something may embarass (sp) them. Or an innocent man can knowingly withhold evidence which would clear him quickly and save the tax payer money for the same reason? That wasn't your point, though, was it? "The right to silence is relatively new actually." Now when that's proved wrong you've moved it to, well old doesn't mean good. You've also ignored two people who raised issues with what you were saying yesterday. Stop talking shite!

I normally put both the seat and lid down after I'm done, but it's a good character test when you first meet a woman. Anyone petty enough to take this issue seriously is not worth knowing.

Wonderful ideals, totally impractical, if even fair. You expect people who work their arses off to provide the same opportunities to their children as someone who does the bare minimum? Don't forget to tell the last one out to turn out the lights, because those remaining won't be able to afford it.