-
Posts
22748 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Everything posted by Andrew
-
think this will backfire for the Libs at the next election. Cleggs starting look as though he's power crazed. If I was Cameron I would come out tonight and pull out of talks, taking the high ground. Let libs and lab deliver the savage cuts and then clean up next time. Like they did this time?
-
alledgedly though he was surely likely to go anyway if he didnt win this election hung parliament or not
-
Next Labour Leader betting - latest odds from William Hill: Evens - David Miliband 7/1 - Alan Johnson 8/1 - Ed Balls, Ed Miliband, Alistair Darling 12/1 - Harriet Harman, Peter Mandelson
-
I read that as "bear" at first I must say Im disappointed
-
good manager though to be fair to him, I like that hes gone abroad unlike a lot of current english managers who just mope around until another english job comes round
-
is that not because the album was for some reason made loud?
-
can you imagine the accent he'd end up with if he ended up with us?
-
cole looked fine against wigan yesterday, so did terry rooney should be fit, hes got some time now, ferdinand too gerrards still gerrard and can still do the business, he'll not be playing in a team where he knows without torres hes the only good player capable of getting them up there, its weighed on him heavily this season imo
-
couldve shopped the 3 stripes off the shoulder
-
theres quite a few there Id have
-
at least his repetetive ranting will be semi at place in this one
-
you accidentally put an "M" in the title it should read "Hughton says not any signings this summer" right?
-
joe bonamassa his last 2 albums
-
Quoted so when England get knocked out in the quarter finals i can laugh in your face. England are SHITE! which group are ireland in?
-
reckon we'll manage semis this time round myself, and that will be a good result for us
-
Favoured 11s anyone? --------------hart-------------- johnson-terry-ferdinand-cole --------carrick-lampard------- cole---------gerrard-----young ------------rooney-------------- going to do what I did last euro cup with my dad, we're not betting people but just stick a fiver each on two bets for winner and top scorer though at the moment im stumped for who Im going for, injuries all over the place
-
-
where from/how much? on the subject, anyone finding good deals on england shirts? would like one for the WC
-
his own party dont do that
-
To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be. After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives. From what I can see, the share of the vote is this: Con 39.1% Lab 30.3% LD 22.5% Others 8% Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg. Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown. Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again? That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt then you're a bigger cunt than he is It was an illustrative (but exagerated) point, dickhead youre the cunt who'd rather have the BNP in power than labour dickhead No, re-read my follow up post for fuck's sake. The question was not about Labour or BNP it was about the bongeye comes down to the same thing, wouldnt make sense to say "Id rather cameron than brown but rather labour over the conservatives"
-
To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be. After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives. From what I can see, the share of the vote is this: Con 39.1% Lab 30.3% LD 22.5% Others 8% Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg. Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown. Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again? That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt then you're a bigger cunt than he is It was an illustrative (but exagerated) point, dickhead youre the cunt who'd rather have the BNP in power than labour dickhead
-
few of them are our superscout finds, buy cheap and release? not quite the mantra they were setting out
-
To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be. After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives. From what I can see, the share of the vote is this: Con 39.1% Lab 30.3% LD 22.5% Others 8% Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg. Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown. Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again? That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt then you're a bigger cunt than he is