Monroe Transfer

Thought you're supposed to be his biggest fan?

101greatgoals

PM your address DEADMAN, I'll order you a pack of these

I think it's the context banter is often said in. "Going to have some banter with the lads. A bit of pre-lash before we hit the town for a couple of cheeky Amarettos". Or acting like a twat, insulting or having a real go at someone and then excusing it by saying "it's just banter".

"Lash", and particularly "pre-lash".

Do you think he doesn't want to sell us anyway? He'd sell today if the right offer (for him) came in.

Had a quick Google and it looks like the original source is CaughtOffside.com. Explains why Deano didn't mention where he got it from. http://www.caughtoffside.com/2011/08/05/ne...celona-hit-man/ In other words, it simply could not be less credible. It's an absolute nothing story. The NOTW was more believable.

Isn't Kerlon best known for his seal dribble skill? Not the most impressive thing to be known best for.

Get Aguero on already.

Almost certainly nonsense. At the very least that would be a loan fee. You've failed to provide a source, and he's been playing in all of their pre-season games (ahead of Torres), scoring a few, and both he and his manager have made it clear that he wants to fight for his place at Chelsea this season.

He's wank man. Impressed me nearly every time I saw him last season, and got a decent goal tally as well. Whether he could make the step up and continue that form is another matter.

I wouldn't mind us going in for Shane Long as long as the price was right.

No publications with credibility are running with this story.

It's well and good saying all that but the problem is we heard that the Carroll money would be reinvested. Selling Carroll was bad enough, but a lot of fans were OK with it in the end as long as the money was put back into getting new players. I can live without big money transfers but as things stand a pathetically low amount of that money will be spent. An inexcusably low amount. Something "Mike and Derek" don't seem aware of is that to improve the team - and in due course, the income - investing in new players is essential. It gets ticket sold and merch bought, it attracts players to the club and it pleases existing squad members. Once again it begs the question of what we would have done this summer had we not sold Carroll. Nothing, you'd assume. "We haven’t got investment above our income" is a joke too, since as Happy Face posted our net inflow is something like £40m over the years.

The Daily Star for fuck's sake... Come on man.

"Simples" Saying that on here should result in an instant ban.

Pastore to PSG confirmed. http://www.psg.fr/fr/Pre-home/001001/Pre-Home

He is just what we need. Another questionable French midfielder. The answer to our scoring woes.

Mint (as in "that goal was mint") Lush Naff Yours?

Ketchup and garlic mayo? Just wrong.

Aye, and £12m for Milner was "too good to turn down" - with Villa flogging him to Man City for £26m proving what an astute piece of business it was by NUFC. It was too good to turn down at the time, wasn't it? No-one was to know he'd show such a marked improvement at Villa. Man City tend to pay way over the odds for players. Some people take the cynicism thing too far.

I asked a question, genius. I wasn't creating a scapegoat, I merely suggested a hypothetical scenario. I don't know exactly how much input the two of them share, but I do wonder how many of the many debacles we've seen would have gone as far as they did if Llambias was competent. With a better man in the job, would we be better off or does Ashley have so much input that it wouldn't matter? I even said in the OP you find so laughable that it's Ashley's fault regardless.

Reported.

i said before, theyre amatuers. both of them way, way out of their depth. Stunning insight.

Sweet Jesus.