Rayvin

Indeed. That's not a solution though, that's just a statement. Insecure, emotionally weak and threatened people the world over are a problem. Now that we've said that, what do we do about it? Surely continuing to isolate and castigate them isn't a useful answer?

Well, thanks for the vote of confidence in my intentions. I read as broad and varied a range of media as is possible. I read the Guardian literally every day. I digest more left wing news than right wing - my views are all left wing politically as I think is very well known on here. I don't believe there's an Islamic invasion of Europe going on, I don't believe there is any actual attempt at white genocide, I don't believe much of what I digest from Sargon et al at all, really. What I do see though, is that many people do believe this, and that the reason they do is because it's so easy to point to examples in the left that rather clearly demonstrate a contempt for white men. This is one of the reasons I believe we have Trump in the first place. The number of people who believe this stuff is growing, and yes, that's not the left fault's directly - but indirectly, we need a message for disaffected white working class men that isn't "you're the problem here". That's never going to win them over. And that is absolutely what our message is. I suppose it's beyond naive to hope that we can just try to work through everyone's insecurities with a rational and honest discussion, but that's what I'd do if I was in a position to influence it, and that's all I really believe in.

You know what, fuck it - I've had enough of this now Trump bad. Nazis bad. Antifa good. World is simple. There are no shades of grey. Everything is entirely as the media presents it to be. Is there some sand around to stick my head in?

In terms of ideology you can't compare them. Antifa are well meaning if totally deluded, despite their belief that violence is necessary and their hatred of the soft left and centre (they hate us more than the nazis, incidentally - the nazis are at least honest, apparently). The Nazis are intentionally destructive and the Communists are unintentionally destructive. That said, in terms of tactics being used on the ground, ideologies to one side, they're equivalent right up to the point where that nutter killed a woman. That puts the Nazis ahead in the violence stakes, but it's not for want of trying by Antifa. Both sides believe in violence as a political solution, both sides want to shut down debate, and both sides believe there is a civil war coming and are agitating for it. But look, this isn't actually my main problem here. Antifa can do whatever they like as long as we're not thinking that they're the heroes of this whole affair and thus inadvertently leave the door open for absolute chaos as with when we allied with Stalin to beat the Nazis last time..! The main problem I have here is that the rhetoric being used by Antifa and the SJWs is driving more and more people to the Nazis. Simply put, the 'Nazi high command' must fucking love them. We need to look compassionately at the problem of young white men being radicalised into this, and look at all component factors. Some of those factors absolutely are that these men are very insecure, and that university Professors calling for 'white genocide' and such like are not helping to de-escalate the problem. The reason a sensible conversation on this isn't being had, is that the SJWs and those sympathetic to them know they can't have an honest one which their ideological positions would survive. So they're betting the farm on being able to stop the nazis by force, rather than accept that their ideology, while not as harmful as nazism, is exclusionary and problematic with respect of certain demographics, and that this needs to change.

Antifa.

Well he's fucked Alt Left for me now anyway, he may as well take it.

Not comfortable with Antifa getting the label "Alt Left". I wanted that for when a rational left wing movement was able to develop from the ashes of progressivism and identity politics Also they already have a label. They self identify as anarcho-communists.

I'd be great at that tbf. I should stress that my feelings on this have little to do with Trump though, and everything to do with wanting the increasing tensions to stop.

Yeah but Alex Jones is a bonafide crazy person.

I know, what am I like.

He does seem well suited to the place tbh.

Is that the same Sima from RTG? How comes he only posts there these days

I missed this before, when did I stop liking Jews? I was once subjected to abuse for being Jewish on a train in Bradford. I'm not Jewish of course, but it was an interesting experience.

Good. If they can just do the same with the Daily Stormer we might be getting somewhere.

Troops mate, I hate to say it but if people on here are a typical representation of our support base (and I include myself in this), there's not going to be a vociferous reaction beyond people just giving it up. It's all happened too many times now.

Hard not to pick up defences such as that when exposed to the sort of content I am

I think I left some room for people who use it for things like that I'm aware many people on here use it, I didn't mean you lot unless you're all out there issuing death threats left, right and centre.

@The Fish Who is that baked alaska guy you mentioned? Is he a nazi? His twitter account states that he disavows white supremacists and nazis alike, but I'm guessing he travels in the same circles to a degree. Antifa have permanently blinded him at those protests and it seems to be building up a kick back in the online right wing movement. I also find it depressing that we have 'left wingers' on the SJW side sending him death threats and revelling in his blindness, but then it's twitter, and the vast majority of people who use that platform are beyond saving in an intellectual or compassionate sense. Hate and violence on both sides, it seems.

Not too bad in the end. Annoying but I was worried we'd lost Lejeune for a couple of months initially.

In fairness I wrote that a week ago. Agree that the situation appears to have deteriorated since, although I'm still not convinced he'll just walk away.

Looks to me like he's trying to reposition so that the US are the aggressors by suggesting that the joint military exercise between US and SK will be a provocation but CNN's article was so full of waffle that I might have missed some details. If he's backed down for sure then it's quite a victory for Trump.

I've never even heard of that guy. Would imagine his impact is highly limited.

agreed on both counts.

Yeah I doubt that's too far wrong tbh. Either way though, if he makes a point that actually holds water, it's a good point irrespective of his background. I find it useful to listen to all sides.

Not one of his bigger topics tbh, but I think they get damned by association with intersectional feminism. Having said that, he brought up some manner of manifesto they issued demanding reparations from all white people along with what sounded disconcertingly like the establishment of a 'black state' within the US that governed itself independently from the rest of it. I'm sure they were just some fringe elements within the movement though. What is most annoying about him is that he commits many of the same sins that the 'biased' media he criticises does. Cherry picks examples and draws sweeping conclusions from them.