Dr Gloom

He's got a bigger female following than you though. at least i've got your mam cooking me breakfast 37 year old reaching her sexual peak tbh Makes no difference to you though when you look like Alan Beith. i have don't have a comeback to match that one

the adenture game. anybody remember that? that bit with the vortex at the end used to look state of the art - http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/classic/adventuregame/trivia.shtml chockablock and let's pretend - they don't make kid's tv like that anymore giant refreshers and wham bars at the school tuck shop watching grandstand climax with des lynham reading the results coming in on the state of the art viddy printer saint and greavsie on a saturday afternoon. bullseye on a sunday afternoon

He's got a bigger female following than you though. at least i've got your mam cooking me breakfast 37 year old reaching her sexual peak tbh

He's got a bigger female following than you though. at least i've got your mam cooking me breakfast

cordon's main source of humour is that he's fat. soon gets tired. male version of dawn french tbh

it's the yin to islamophobia's yan; i felt obliged

this cat could propbably manage it

the whole episode seems purractically impawsable (sorry)

Mrs Maddison bitch gave me a predicted grade of a U in Psychology - totally fucked up my UCAS form. no matter how crap she thought I was, surely she should have predicted me the lowest pass going? i think she wanted me to quit the class so i wouldn't pull her average grade down. ended up getting a C. Silly cow wouldn't even congratulate me when we went into school to collect the results. she was so bitter, was like she wanted me to fail.

obviously a dog person

on the subject of porn, i miss the old vintage stuff from the 80s and 90s when they actually went at it like normal people. today's it all seems to be this gonzo stuff which seems to cater for people who get off on seeing how far the filmmakers will go in their quest to find new ways to degrade the female porn stars. it's like they're all trying to outdo each other with the number of things they can stick in any of number of orifices at any one time. and that bukkake shit? gross - who gets off on that? not really the kind of thing to watch with the mrs when you're trying to get her in the mood.

seems like this thread has ben going on for arfa lifetime

we need a flair player though. bad attitude or not, we're desparately short of pace and guile in attack.

this thread aint arfa dragging on

santa cruz would be canny but it would be a throwback to shearer and ferguson if we played him up front alongside carrol. two big battering rams leading the line.

The previous system still had a deadline during the season, that's what it should go back to imo. wasn't it in march or something? you basically had the majority of the season to get your hosue in order. i never really understood what was wrong with the old system or why fifa felt the need to change it. can't see how the transfer window has improved the game in any way

i don't get it. is he trying to be funny?

i don't get the whole transfer window full stop. should be put back to open season for transfers all year around if you ask me.

difficult to say as i don't think that our team overall is as good now as it was the summer we signed bellamy and robert. i'm pretty sure a player with bellamy's pace and movement woud have a similar impact though. we're crying out for a pacey front man in the bellamy/agbonlahor mould to play off carroll. nolan did well yesterday but i doubt he'll maintain that level of performance across a season. pace and mobility up front is massively important at this level. Which Agbonlahor most certainly doesn't have. well he's a willing runner with pace, who is happy to work the channels. there aren't many like that on our books at the moment

i have strong feelings about people who blow planes into buildings, yeah. i think the reaction of the people in new york is easier to understand than the decision by the muslim community in manhattan to commission a mosque to be built so close to ground zero. you'd think they'd have a bit of common sense. why not build one a little further uptown instead? At least Leazes has the intellectual honesty to say what he believes and defend it, this half arsed they should build it further away argument is even more offensive to me i don't agree with leazes. he's tarnishing all muslims with the same brush. i'm not. there are plenty of moderate average joe muslims out there. i don't get why they couldn't see that this move would open a can of worms. This Imam is a moderate who has long tried to reach out to other faiths http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archiv...been-one/61761/ 'Ground Zero' Imam: 'I Am a Jew, I Have Always Been One' In 2003, Imam Rauf was invited to speak at a memorial service for Daniel Pearl, the journalist murdered by Islamist terrorists in Pakistan. The service was held at B'nai Jeshurun, a prominent synagogue in Manhattan, and in the audience was Judea Pearl, Daniel Pearl's father. In his remarks, Rauf identified absolutely with Pearl, and identified himself absolutely with the ethical tradition of Judaism. "I am a Jew," he said. He wants to build this outreach centre to promote understanding and reconcilliation. People ar ealways asking for moderate Muslims to come forward - one has and look at the response As I said at least Leazes is honest i'm being honest too. the reference to sep 11 was an attempt to demonstrate that i have some compassion for the people in new york who are objecting to this. september 11 2001 isn't that long ago. i have nothing against the people behind the new mosque and despite their intentions, which look good enough, they should have predicted that this would turn out the way it has. they should have known better. america is a very conservative place by european standards. the reaction there has been overblown but very predictable. The people who are objecting to this are, in the same way that you are, conflating the muslim religion with terrorism. Being outraged by the building of a muslim centre is to say that all muslims support terrorism. This view should be opposed i'm not saying the people behind the mosque are terrorists. but if the moderates want to restore the faith lost in them by many americans post- 9/11, they'd do their cause no harm by rethinking this move. look, there's no law saying that what they're doing is wrong they're doing. it just strikes me as being more than a tad insensitive. Your argument that its insensitive to promote understanding between peace loving religions is nonsensical that's all very well in theory but in reality, all they're doing is drawing attention to an atrocity that new yorkers are still sensitive about.

It's not all about the goals - which is my point. Bellamy's general play and footballing intelligence has always been vastly superior to Agbonlahor's. it is now - he's a class player now and has added a lot to his all round game over the years - finishing and use of the ball. i'm not sure he was that much better than agbonlahor when he joined tbh. he was young and raw too. i'd argue it was his willingess to take players on and stretch defences that gave us a different dimension and gave shearer a new lease of life.

difficult to say as i don't think that our team overall is as good now as it was the summer we signed bellamy and robert. i'm pretty sure a player with bellamy's pace and movement woud have a similar impact though. we're crying out for a pacey front man in the bellamy/agbonlahor mould to play off carroll. nolan did well yesterday but i doubt he'll maintain that level of performance across a season. pace and mobility up front is massively important at this level.

i have strong feelings about people who blow planes into buildings, yeah. i think the reaction of the people in new york is easier to understand than the decision by the muslim community in manhattan to commission a mosque to be built so close to ground zero. you'd think they'd have a bit of common sense. why not build one a little further uptown instead? At least Leazes has the intellectual honesty to say what he believes and defend it, this half arsed they should build it further away argument is even more offensive to me i don't agree with leazes. he's tarnishing all muslims with the same brush. i'm not. there are plenty of moderate average joe muslims out there. i don't get why they couldn't see that this move would open a can of worms. This Imam is a moderate who has long tried to reach out to other faiths http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archiv...been-one/61761/ 'Ground Zero' Imam: 'I Am a Jew, I Have Always Been One' In 2003, Imam Rauf was invited to speak at a memorial service for Daniel Pearl, the journalist murdered by Islamist terrorists in Pakistan. The service was held at B'nai Jeshurun, a prominent synagogue in Manhattan, and in the audience was Judea Pearl, Daniel Pearl's father. In his remarks, Rauf identified absolutely with Pearl, and identified himself absolutely with the ethical tradition of Judaism. "I am a Jew," he said. He wants to build this outreach centre to promote understanding and reconcilliation. People ar ealways asking for moderate Muslims to come forward - one has and look at the response As I said at least Leazes is honest i'm being honest too. the reference to sep 11 was an attempt to demonstrate that i have some compassion for the people in new york who are objecting to this. september 11 2001 isn't that long ago. i have nothing against the people behind the new mosque and despite their intentions, which look good enough, they should have predicted that this would turn out the way it has. they should have known better. america is a very conservative place by european standards. the reaction there has been overblown but very predictable. The people who are objecting to this are, in the same way that you are, conflating the muslim religion with terrorism. Being outraged by the building of a muslim centre is to say that all muslims support terrorism. This view should be opposed i'm not saying the people behind the mosque are terrorists. but if the moderates want to restore the faith lost in them by many americans post- 9/11, they'd do their cause no harm by rethinking this move. look, there's no law saying that what they're doing is wrong they're doing. it just strikes me as being more than a tad insensitive.

sure, there's no legal argument to stop it. doesn't mean that the mosque commissioner is any less of a moron than charlton heston though does it? there's constitional rights then there's common sense.