manc-mag

Notice periods are pretty simple. Both sides can sue on them in the event of a breach but that means little on its own, you have to ask what the respective remedies would be. Obviously if it was the employer not honouring it then it would automatically entitle you as employee to three months wages. If it was you not honouring it however then you dont owe them wages (obviously) as you don't contract to pay them wages. They could argue that you owe them the equivalent of what they would have paid you in wages because that is what they deem you are worth, but then that doesnt really stack up because you would be right to ask, have they actually lost this sum? ie they would obviously just be paying that to someone else anyway if they were to get someone in to do your job. The damage to an employer caused by breaking a long notice period is usually (ie unless you're absolutely pivotal to an organisation and there are lucrative contracts depending on you alone), the inconvenience to re-recruitment etc. and being able to plan to bring someone else in to do your job. If just about anyone can do your job (like say, Gemmill), then you can see that the notice period isn't actually anything much apart from a convenience to your employer to re-recruit, and usually the way it is enforced is the threat of not providing a reference if it is broken. Negotiation is always the best course though if possible and everything I've said above is subject to the actual terms of your contract. So if it says specifically what will happen to you if you breach it then you have your answer there already.

I think it isn't the racism it's the bullying aspect with all the white girls picking on the coloured one. This may be just a coincedence. But jade has been sacked in absentia from her post as patron of an anti bullying charity. Jesus wept! *hangs head*

Adopts Peter Kay voxpop refrain: Anyone remember those chocolate flavour crisps? And spacehoppers? Garlic bread. Garlic....BREAD?

Ali (Happy) Bomaye!

Unlike Danielle I think she's intelligent enough and I think some of the stuff she says, (while not overtly racist) is probably motivated in part by racism. I have to say it is mainly bitching though generally. On a separate note, Jo is utterly rancid. I haven't watched it tbh, just heard about the furore - on the news ffs! Anyway, always thought she was hard faced and I reckon she was only in S-Club because she can sing. What's all that about? Definite man-head.

On that note, 'Waterloo' was a bold choice by that Swedish four piece that history seems to have forgotten.

Or his grilling machines for that matter. That's George Formby man! Turned out nice again! MUTHERRRRRRRR!!!

Unlike Danielle I think she's intelligent enough and I think some of the stuff she says, (while not overtly racist) is probably motivated in part by racism. I have to say it is mainly bitching though generally. On a separate note, Jo is utterly rancid.

Or his grilling machines for that matter.

To be honest I get the impression that Jo is racist. The dirty gypsy that she is.

I believe it may have been me and my twitchy finger can't find the thread tho ? Ah yes, the twitchy finger thread. Has that been resolved or do you consider it a nice bonus now? it "comes and goes" now so it can come in quite handy in a crisis !! When the rabbit's batteries go flat? Never mind the batteries, she's worn the end of it flat.

history 1 a record or account of past events, developments etc. 2 all that is preserved of the past, esp. in written form 3 the discipline of recording and interpreting past events The emphasis is on the recording (in some way) of past events which therefore allows for the interpretation of that information at a later time. It can be used to just refer to 'the past', but this is a secondary usage and is arguably sloppy as it implies more.

History will judge that Alex is seething

Glad someone understood that. Textbook case of Alex throwing just about enough theories out there that one inadvertantly hits the mark tbh.

Anyone know where Alex was born? You, calling me ugly? Have a word pigface Feet growing as far away from his face as they can tbh.

It's hardly pedantic. Thats the essential difference is it not? One is history and one is pre-history. Correctamundo. ayethangyew History A-Level Grade A to back that shit up. And thats when A-Levels were still hard!

It's hardly pedantic. Thats the essential difference is it not? One is history and one is pre-history. Well, there is that, but I was also making the distinction between history and everyday life (especially hundreds of years ago) that went completely unrecorded. History then tended to about big events. Perhaps I am being pedantic For a change Alex exposed as having bluffed his way through the thread there.

Joan Armatrading?

It's hardly pedantic. Thats the essential difference is it not? One is history and one is pre-history.

No, thanks. I just have amazing taste in music. Edit: if you can be bothered searching I even started a thread somewhere about having sex with a girl - that's quite hetero tbh. Yeah but SMO does that regularly. I was gonna post that but I'd already made one joke about him being in the closet. No prizes for guessing why they call Wacky the straight man.

No, thanks. I just have amazing taste in music. Edit: if you can be bothered searching I even started a thread somewhere about having sex with a girl - that's quite hetero tbh. Yeah but SMO does that regularly.

Obviously, obviously. 3/4. I'm usually good with those but I couldn't get the first word for the life of me. If it wasn't obvious it should have been.

Says the accountant. My degree was boring, but (it wasn't accountancy btw), at least it was mostly numbers and there was a readily attainable right or wrong answer. You're having to wade through stuff about grain collections in 1930s Russia ffs! Besides, I bet accountancy pays better than being a historian......although historians have better beards. Like fuck i'm being a historian! Its not so much about the actual figures, more about the consequences of a few bad years of collections on the peasantry. Its actually quite interesting as history goes, you ignorant git. I'd have to disagree with you there. I think a lot of history is extremely interesting. A lot more of it isn't though. I'd be willing to bet that you're too ignorant re. much of history to make that a valid statement. Actually, you pretentious git, I agree that a lot of history is interesting. But when you consider that history contains everything that has ever happened, a lot more of it will be tedious in the extreme. History is just the past that has been recorded tttt. Point still stands, oypt. O..... You Pedantic Twat????

34 waist Straining to get in those 501's tbh. Thats not the brand name either.

Says the accountant. My degree was boring, but (it wasn't accountancy btw), at least it was mostly numbers and there was a readily attainable right or wrong answer. You're having to wade through stuff about grain collections in 1930s Russia ffs! Besides, I bet accountancy pays better than being a historian......although historians have better beards. Like fuck i'm being a historian! Its not so much about the actual figures, more about the consequences of a few bad years of collections on the peasantry. Its actually quite interesting as history goes, you ignorant git. I'd have to disagree with you there. I think a lot of history is extremely interesting. A lot more of it isn't though. I'd be willing to bet that you're too ignorant re. much of history to make that a valid statement. Actually, you pretentious git, I agree that a lot of history is interesting. But when you consider that history contains everything that has ever happened, a lot more of it will be tedious in the extreme. History is just the past that has been recorded tttt. pwned!