Jump to content

ChocChip

Members
  • Content Count

    547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ChocChip

  1. ChocChip

    'Types'

    I've heard there are some women out there who don't like giving head. I find this difficult to believe, surely natural selection would have weened them out by now... It's a strange world.
  2. ChocChip

    'Types'

    White women.......
  3. Good call all those who answered my questions about the board .... Which was, eerrr....nobody except pp, mancmag and chocchip....even though we couldn't agree completely, they answered 108015[/snapback] We shouldn't confuse ability with ambition though.
  4. He's sh*t at football though, which i see as a disadvantage.
  5. the voters ? poor comparison mind ...... 106720[/snapback] Aye fair enough...who then turn on her* as she is no longer perceived to be making the right decisions to take the country in the right direction and so she resigns. Whats the difference? You're seriously deluded. By the way re the question why I chose Liverpool as opposed to another club. They're a comparable size to us and they win stuff. Thats what I want us to do. I want us to be mre like them than Everton. You're content to just be 'better than Everton'. Which is part of the problem. *Thatcher/Maj
  6. the voters ? poor comparison mind ...... 106720[/snapback] Aye fair enough...who then turn on her* as she is no longer perceived to be making the right decisions to take the country in the right direction and so she resigns. Whats the difference? You're seriously deluded. By the way re the question why I chose Liverpool as opposed to another club. They're a comparable size to us and they win stuff. Thats what I want us to do. I want us to be mre like them than Everton. You're content to just be 'better than Everton'. Which is part of the problem. *Thatcher/Maj
  7. You can't have done much. Lamont was the chancellor under John Major. 106699[/snapback] Errrrr, i'm a lot better at comparitive religion
  8. Ramage will only be decent if he plays very intelligently imo. This is because he's slow, not very strong, not a great jumper (decent timing though), not a great tackler and seriously average at football. To make up for this he must play with great awareness and excellent decision making becasue he has no physical attributes to rely on to get him out of trouble.
  9. I've done a bit of political histroy lately so i'll attempt to draw a comparison. Thatcher - Primeminister Lamont - Chancellor Economy f**ks up big time, Lamont takes the fall, but who is ultimately responsible?
  10. LM, i'm quite aware that i'm loading these questions in my favour and as you disagree i can understand your reluctance to give me satisfaction on this issue, but to pursue my point further: Do YOU think Dalgleish was a sucees ? YES/NO Do YOU think Gullit was a succes ? YES/NO Do YOU think Robson was a succes ? YES/NO Do YOU think Souness was a success ? YES/NO Ideally i would like you to answer yes or by your own criteria, though of course you quite free to answer in any way you see fit. I just feel a direct yes or no to each of these would be a good spring board for ongoi
  11. Regardless of foresight and hindsight, which of the 4 managers FS has appointed do you think has bought success to the club? Just give me a number, not an explanation for his choices, i've read them already.
  12. I have it on pretty good authority Daglish didn't rate Ferdinand, there were others players he could have sold first, if he wished. EDIT: Incidentally, I hope you aren't insinuating the chairman sells players at NUFC 102498[/snapback] Maybe not. But he had to recuperate money and Ferdinand was the prize asset. Shear bad luck that our other star striker was seriously injured preseason (pun intended), leaving a kid by himself. 102510[/snapback] Did Souness suffer from the same bas luck then?
  13. FAO: Renton. Sorry, don't want to use up bandwidth. Personally i feel Given has been more important. If an employer gets 1 appoinment right out of 4, is he a good recruiter?
  14. The point about his record of managerial appoints chocchip, and I'm answering you as at least you answer questions with common sense and factual info rather than just ducking them, is as I have said all along which is that no-one, absolutely no one, could have forseen a manager, ie Dalglish we are talking about, who had won 4 league titles and 3 FA Cups and 3 manager of the years as being anything other than a top quality, high level appointment of the highest standing. So, what else do you expect Fred / the board, to do ? Reasonable question yes ? I'm sorry but just to say with hindsight
  15. Me too, what a time to blank me
  16. Took me ages to write as well
  17. In my most humble and blackest of opinions Shepherd appears to be doing pretty well with the financial side of things. However, i'm curious to see how our recent spending spree has affected how standing. If the money spent in the close season puts us in serious financial trouble then Shepherd's actions are indefensible. He will have gambled NUFC's fortune on a manager no one important except FS thought capable. However, my guess is that FS is a bit cleverer than that and that we could afford it, just. It is fundamental to point out though that FS only makes money available that the club
  18. ChocChip

    Luque

    One of my criteria would be that the manager would be very satisfied with the squad as it is because i don't think we can afford wholesale changes. It happens too often at NUFC, new manager, new first 11. We need someone who can bring the potential out of the squad while strengthening on the cheap. I guess the criteria people look for is track record, status, etc. I can see that, but my above point is essential imo. Souness clearly didn't like the squad which i think causes a lot of problems. Players get a new boss and the first thing he does is try to replace him, that would make me moody
  19. Most clubs have a reserve side and, failing that, a youth system. Why haven't we?
  20. Bolton probably couldn't afford the weight penalty for taking him.
  21. I'd play Luque instead of Dyer, he needs a rest i reckon. I'd have Chopra on the bench if Shearer's not fit. Charlton are pretty awful tbh.
  22. I think Elliott will do fine against S'Hampton but if Charlton play Rommerdahl they're gonna get a lot of joy down the right wing.
  23. On MOTD, Roeder seemed to hint that Southampton may be his last game if he takes it. I reckon he know's something is close. Also, why has a call for Hitzfeld been deemed puzzling? Is it because he's not Oliver's choice?
×
×
  • Create New...