Toonpack

Willock and I think big Joe is next on the chopping block (not imminently but he's moving up the queue).

No I'm not sure but I think it's a plausible reason, you've got to be able to prove loss in court. The stadium sponsorship will be waiting on the City case IMO, no point signing something for £10 Mill/year when you could maybe get five times that, sure you could sign something with escalators built in but those would be subject the fmv test and likely binned off, better to wait to see what happens with City's challenge. PSR is shite but for as long as it gets voted for by the clubs can't see it changing, the 6 vote for it to protect themselves and they get support from those owners who just want to remain on the gravy train without being financially exposed to having to put in really big wedge to stay in the game. PSR should be about making sure owners don't milk a club to death but it does none of that.

Thought the free kick/set pieces looked interesting yesterday, poor execution (corners still shit) but some interesting wrinkles, be good to see that develop. A lot more nuanced than Arsenal's 8 men around the goalkeeper at corners bollocks.

That bit, I think there's little we could do outside of voting against the rules, we don't have legal recourse because we haven't suffered a material loss that we can argue. That's why we're supporting City in their case as they did have a contract knocked back so can demonstrate/substantiate a loss. That and the fact City's case is years ahead of any case we could start, even if we could.

Stole that ring, didn't you ?

I actually think (hope) if we don't get offered top dollar that the owners will make him sweat, am sure he won't get reintegrated unless the group are OK with it and if they're not, he will remain isolated.

Based on what I'd been told and the comments from those teammates today (Burn/Gordon), they heartily endorse that sentiment.

Given today's evidence they're relegation material WITH them two.

A point and clean sheet away at the beige, that's fine.

And we all know what that means 😱

The bits were flung in the Wear, whisht lad had yer gob.

Tielemans has done 4 fouls, nowt.

Nor water for that matter, apart from the well bit.

On closer inspection it's Sir Jeremy Beadle and the sea serpent, got a tiny little left hand.

What the actual fuck is that, St George and the sea serpent 🤷‍♂️😂😂😂

Not anywhere else that I've seen, smells like bullshit. The Italian shill's not even mentioned it.

We're not coming off 3 games in a week, or whatever it was, like the last time so defence should at least be more cohesive.

Is that a comment on the state of the female adults only "talent" or is it the drink?

Scouser in a wheelchair, very high risk of him blagging, he probably could have ran away.

Murderers club statement "alleged this allegedly that" cunts.

Fuck me 🙄 😂😂😂😂😂

Aye, you did

You posed a hypothetical question, if Isak was back in training would he be selected to play. Obviously for him to be back in training something significant would have had to change and also Eddie would have to be satisfied that change crossed all the t's and dotted all the i's of what he Eddie would accept to allow him back into aforementioned training. If THAT hypothetical situation existed and the standard was met, of course he'd be selected.

As a positive, that Argie cunt Martinez is suspended.

You're interpreting what I said as something you want to think I said, but I didn't. It's not the reality anyway, so feel free, chortle away.