Neville Neville Neville

Parky a year ahead on predictions yet again. you're at least 10 years ahead with your newcastle = 7th prediction tbh

amazing. rtaylor has been here a month and can still take a corner/cross. must be the no-kinnear effect

i think its 442 with rtayllor doing his phil neville 'jack of all trades' impression. at least he'll be more mobile than butt

*awaits LeazesMag* but freddie must be loving the fact that ashley in general is making him look the perfect chairman when he was far from it

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/200...15875-21162409/

There was a fat man called Ashley Who wore his Newcastle shirt quite bashly He was having loads of fun Till he said goodbye to Keegan Now he wishes he hadn't paid up so rashly

It's about time Labour banned snow, the UK just can't take it. Yes, but year on year snow is down from 1997, what did the Tories ever do about it? (end avoiding the issue a la PMQs)

exactly - we don't want another Energizer Bunny but someone with skill, vision and foresight Joe Kinnear to return from the hospital bed as cente mid/captain/manager

dun dun DUN http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/17766...o-prove-it.html *eastenders drums play, and roll credits*

Butt is shit, simple as that. KD you talk some shit like...Nolan 4th choice? Hahahaha honestly you couldnt make it up Nolan and Guthrie to run the season in....Nolan and Barton to start next season, unless we get a real gem of a creative midfielder then id let Barton go. Butt like Geremi and Cacapa should be NOWHERE near the 1st team unless its an emergency. I have NO faith in any of them three. I wasn't saying Butt isn't shit. You missed Steven Taylor off your list btw. I was agreeing with you alex, more so aimed at KD. NNN i dont talk shite tho mate, i just have a contrasting opinion to others! 52,386 others, tbh

Butt is shit, simple as that. KD you talk some shit like...Nolan 4th choice? Hahahaha honestly you couldnt make it up Nolan and Guthrie to run the season in....Nolan and Barton to start next season, unless we get a real gem of a creative midfielder then id let Barton go. Butt like Geremi and Cacapa should be NOWHERE near the 1st team unless its an emergency. I have NO faith in any of them three. Its like a pot calling a kettle "a pot" However, GL is right to say that Butt should be ahead of Nolan. Butt has proven himself to be below average for most of the season (i'm mincing my words here), whilst Nolan has had 2 OK games against pretty shite midfield opposition. Nolan is unlikely to be a world beater, but is yet to blot his copybook to the level Nicky Butt has (to be fair, Butt's copybook is probably all blotted ink and no paper by now) and deserves the benefit of the doubt. I think considering our dire midfield when fit, and the fact that we're missing barton makes it even more dire, Nolan was a decent signing for the money and position our club is in. I wouldn't have had him 2 seasons ago, but things have gone backwards since then Also, the only play Nicky breaks up is ours

and imo the greatest ever spoof newspaper report http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/busines...ek-20080125680/

not as funny as this tbh imo http://www.theonion.com/content/video/appl...s_revolutionary its funny because its possible

not really related, but not worth its own topic anyone see this? http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2229774.ece bloody ridiculous

Can this be the last time for that joke now please. OK. But still think Glenn would be better (well, in a realistic way) than Sven

Unlucky i guess mate...sorry well, you're lucky as you often won't have your undivided attention for Newcastle on saturdays

This is the bit that resonates with me But it is a bit sad that this (or something similar) isn't seen as the norm

what's particularly good about this friday and weekend, is that Newcastle would have to work really hard to ruin it for once.... although i won't rule that out just yet

I know you're jesting but it sort of brings up another thing. It bothers me that so many people worry about something that doesn't either exist or that they have no control over. It would be a much better world if people concentrated on stuff they can actually influence and improve the world / make it a more pleasant place. Who was it said people should worship people? Come join the Humanist revolution. First we'll kill the Jews, then the Muslims, then the Pope, and then we'll force the remaining world to convert to Humanism, build massive "places of worship" to reaffirm our love of Humanism, set out a strict code that all Humanists must follow or they'll be screwed at the end, and make sure that large amounts of money are donated to some sort of Central Humanist building which obviously needs a leader, who doesn't really need to follow the underlying Humanist values.... and then the world will be a much better pla......... oh crap its happened again!!

Encouraging quotes from GR (source www.glennroeder.co.glennroeder/glennroeder/glennroederquotes) "Glenn Roeder does not understand why Glenn Roeder has not been approached for the job. Glenn Roeder has kept Newcastle up before. Glenn Roeder has premiership experience. Glenn Roeder will not require compensation and would work for a pittance. Glenn Roeder doesn't care about Dennis Wise. Glenn Roeder doesn't make excuses for Glenn Roeder's previous failings when Glenn Roeder was in charge of Glenn Roeder's Newcastle United. Glenn Roeder can teach Jonas the Roeder....uh humm.. i mean the Glenn Roeder shuffle. Glenn Roeder.... Glenn Roeder...... GLENN ROEDER!!!!!! GLENN ROEDER!!!!"

Is it "Give the blind shirt designers a go" month or something?

Also, if there is a God, I'd love for him to sit down and explain Newcastle United Football Club to me.... tbh That's surely manifest, undeniable proof that He doesn't exist

and yet man could wipe out the most of the worlds suffering. If man looked at itself as one being, one thing, it could share wealth, make everyone equal, forget about personal gain or satisfaction and help those is need. Of course, there is as much chance of seeing a God than this actually happening. but, fact remains, why would a God help if we cannot help ourself? Mind, Im thinking on the grander scale here. Wars, starvation etc man has a hand in. a tsunami that wipes out thousands is a different arguement Many might argue that mans constant neglect and misuse of life brings this on himself. God, supposedly, created man in his own image. I don't believe in God anyway though. But, due to that bitch Eve, we chose to have our eyes opened and eat the apple. Still, I like apples and I like the freewill it brought. Aledgedly. I'd rather get back to the idea of only humanity being able to save itself. Not God, no Jesus or any other mumbo jumbo. It's just lazy thinking imo. Religion that is. Well, I agree. As I said at the start, I dont think any God can influence day to day things, only bring comfort or help someone deal with something in their own mind. But, my point was more to why doesnt God (any God) stop suffering. If there was a God and he had such power, it would be a bit rich us asking when we do fuck all about it ourselves. I think that's the problem with organised religion though. It propagates the idea that there is an omniscient, omnipotent being which, imo, allows people to negate responsibilty - i.e. it's 'God's will'. Especially the salvationist aspect of christianity. I have been assured by a christian friend I will burn in hell for all eternity because of my beliefs (cheers God), but Hitler would have been saved if he chose to believe on his deathbed. Canny. One of the arguments I have used when discussing with my family is: If "God" exists and I was "God," surely I would be more impressed with the person who didn't believe in me but lived a good life, doing good things, for the sake of doing good things rather than the person who lives their life with the end goal of getting 70 virgins in heaven/ all your desires in paradise for eternity / come back reincarnated as something better (delete as per religious beliefs, and I'm deliberately being slightly silly). And, if God would prefer to bestow his praise on the latter individual whose good actions were (in some way) due to their own personal later gain (far outweighing the sacrifice they are making on this world/this life), then He's a bit rubbish really, and not deserving of praise Non??

you've got it wrong Tom. Its the shop socks which are very very very very very very dark blue, priest socks are the only one that are actually black I Father Ted

I was brought up reasonably religiously, and I think that has had a positive impact on me becoming the (hopefully, good) person that I am today. I would never have a go at someone for being religious, because we need a coping system for the horrible things that happen with the world, and if religion helps people cope just a little bit better, then it can't be a bad thing. I also think that religion still has an important role in bringing up children, and guiding them into learning whats right and wrong. And this may be reflected by the increased deterioration in English society as society generally becomes less religious. However, as I've grown up, I've moved towards the important thing being whether at the end of the day you feel that you have generally had a positive influence on society and done what you can to make your little bit of the world a better place. A sort of personal judgement day as compared to the more extreme religious End of World, Judgement Day. There is no Heaven or Hell reward/punishment for having lived a good life, you are just being good because you should be. I don't know when I stopped believing in a 'God' per se, but I have only relatively recently began to stop associating myself with religion. I think thats come from a realisation that most of the good things to do with religion are mainly done on an individual basis, whilst the corruption, stupid (in my opinion obviously) and barbaric things practised tend to be more in the name of the religion. Basically, if all religion was abolished, I feel that a large amount of good done by religious people would carry on, whereas quite a lot of bad done would no longer happen. BTW, I think culture is more important than religion, and I've kept on quite a few bits and pieces that are from religion, not for religious reasons but to remain embracing my culture I've moved more to a humanist stance.... although knowing the way people are, that will become a religion one day, and wars will be fought in the name of humanism (as parodied by the cracking South Park Episode 'Go God Go XII' with the warring Allied Atheist Alliance, United Atheist Alliance, and the United Atheist League) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanism