ChezGiven

At least he's not called Mardy Fish.

Marvellous.

If the centre bottom picture is him looking at porn, it summarise my day perfectly.

The latter definitely.

Faked.

only happened once the I recall, spare is kept within arms reach in that case it was just to jump right into the shower Yeah i've emergency douched a couple of times.

Face wipes! I think I've used a magazine once in desperation like. Nasty. Celebrity face?

When you've not got tissues or baby wipes either, you must have been caught short at least once?

A far more interesting question is how you wipe up when you've run out of bog paper?

I used to think your main hobby was wanking in the mirror while posting on here. Now I realise it's wanking in the mirror with a DS9 DVD on in the background. This post didn't get anywhere near enough love. I had no idea what DS9 was.

It was all in the best possible taste. The insane war-mongering US general in the tank slightly passed me by as a kid. Looking back you realise how political some of the characters were. Obviously not the tranny chat-show host.

How about if they'd just rounded them all up and imprisoned them all for a couple of years? He'd have just forgiven them. So what do you think should done then? Who? When? If they have firm intelligence of a Taliban commander's position, what should be done about it? So this exact scenario? In Pakistan? In a civillian area? I think it's pretty clear from my earlier posts that I'd prefer the approach espoused by General McChrystal. How about you? He seems to be mostly talking about air strikes in firefights, that's not the same thing as knowing exactly where a Taliban leader will be, and if it it were it's not said what would be done. So like Fop said if they know exactly where a Taliban leader will be - what do you think they should do about it? "Round them up in a field and bomb the bastards" Prize to the poster who gets the reference. Kenny Everett? Pair of fake boobs and giant pointy finger on its way in the post.

How about if they'd just rounded them all up and imprisoned them all for a couple of years? He'd have just forgiven them. So what do you think should done then? Who? When? If they have firm intelligence of a Taliban commander's position, what should be done about it? So this exact scenario? In Pakistan? In a civillian area? I think it's pretty clear from my earlier posts that I'd prefer the approach espoused by General McChrystal. How about you? He seems to be mostly talking about air strikes in firefights, that's not the same thing as knowing exactly where a Taliban leader will be, and if it it were it's not said what would be done. So like Fop said if they know exactly where a Taliban leader will be - what do you think they should do about it? "Round them up in a field and bomb the bastards" Prize to the poster who gets the reference.

Only thing i can see on page 5 is fop calling HF, stupid, a moron, a coward and a fascist. Think you picked the wrong page fop.

Good plan, think about the profits. Or the relevance of the debate to the posters in this thread. And the profits. I dont think me posting on here will have an impact on profitability. Can you walk me through how that might work?

Good plan, think about the profits. Or the relevance of the debate to the posters in this thread.

Apparently we are going to be sponsored by Tampax next season, a company spokesman said that supporting a bunch of cunts going through a bad period was what their company was all about.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8117561.stm We should keep this about the NHS HF, not the problems in the US.

Aye, thats the one.

A clock is right twice a day.

Yes.

Gave up what? Fop is immune to choking out since the kevlar windpipe upgrade. Love the way Alex is trying to change sides this morning. He was always going to in the end "right" vs."an argument" = he just can't resist an argument in the end (especially when he is hot and grumpy). Just a bit ironic you calling HF for being argumentative when you refuse to address what he says but insist on your own straw-man interpretation. I agree with your view, as i've already said, that doesnt give you carte blanche to misrepresent someone's views just because they dont fit exactly with your own. To Parky's point, balanced minds dont take sides and they also play fair too.

A bit like the Islamic revolutionaries then.