ChezGiven

Don't know, I could easily earn double the money I earn now taking a job at a huge law firm. Though, I would hardly find much time to spend the money and probably suffer from a stroke or burn out syndrome in about ten years time. No thanks. I suppose the assumption was you were good enough to do the high paying job

You can take pride in any job you do. Ultimately all jobs become boring (unless you are very lucky) so one that pays a lot is best.

I disagree, personally. Having said that, Slowdive uber alles. Anyone remember Spacemen 3? Shoe-gaze-tastic. Druggy druggy music. Like that's a bad thing? Well, see, when some people get high, the things that sound really good to them involve the same chord for several hours. Like The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Hendrix, The Doors and all the rest of that druggy shite? Spacemen 3 were a bit dull like. Anticipated that response. Different people different drugs different reactions different times. Doors were naff too, to be fair. You anticipated the response because you knew you were talking shite tbh Spacemen 3 took acid. What were the Stones on? Crack?

I disagree, personally. Having said that, Slowdive uber alles. Anyone remember Spacemen 3? Shoe-gaze-tastic. Druggy druggy music. Like that's a bad thing? Well, see, when some people get high, the things that sound really good to them involve the same chord for several hours. Like The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Hendrix, The Doors and all the rest of that druggy shite? Spacemen 3 were a bit dull like.

Might find this an interesting read. This theory of the origin of AIDS would mean it was the fault of the Belgians. An attractive theory. The gist is that the disease jumped across species as infected monkey tissue was used in the development of an experimental Polio vaccine that was tested in the 50's in Rwanda/Congo, the epicentre of the epidemic. http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dis...er/NYTimes.html

Why not? Or wear the armbands?

Renton nails it. You cant argue with The Professionals.

selfish how ??? At the end of the day, ultimately, who do you think ends up compromising the most times on most things? By definition both people have to compromise? I know what you mean though. Aye, I know my use of language was sloppy there and my inner lawyer is hanging his head in shame. You still got my point though. and couldnt agree more.

selfish how ??? At the end of the day, ultimately, who do you think ends up compromising the most times on most things? By definition both people have to compromise? I know what you mean though.

Quite.

*saying nowt* I'm DESPERATE to argue with you about this but I'm not going to! You like Porn? Preferably lesbian oooh you've started it now .... see...Jimbos got his screenwipes out already Thought they were for me.

*saying nowt* I'm DESPERATE to argue with you about this but I'm not going to! You like Porn?

The call anything they want AIDS these days. As a diesease it is FINISHED IN EUROPE look at the stats... http://www.avert.org/eurosum.htm This part is still unproven Chex and you of all people should know that. HIV infections has so many contradictions. Clinical trials show what? That Azt kills t-cells faster than aids??!! What is one of the definitions for aids and I challenge you not to laugh? pneumonia = pneumonia pmeumonia + hiv presence = aids Bollocks. If HIV is present and the pneumonia is picked up by a patient who you wouldnt normally expect to get it, then that is probably a clinical symptom associated with immune deficiency. Its the start of the syndrome tbh. Causality Parky, its the cornerstone of medical research. So how does one account for the thousands with HIV presence and no illness of any kind ever? Causality my dear.....Poppycock. Getting back to your earlier point. Flooding a person with retro-virals which as you know are generally broad band in their targetting (not protein inhibitors) will stop all the viruses in their tracks not just HIV. The downside is you can't keep it up for more than a few years due to the side effects. The dissentors aren't arguing that AIDS is brought on by a virus of some kind, they are questioning whether it is the HIV virus. You see the differance. IMO the widespread over use of anti-biotics in the West is part of the picture. They are well know the fuck up the immune system as most people are well aware. Because 'protease' inhibitors (and the rest) suppress viral load so your immune system continues to work. The reason why you cant keep giving people the same drug is because the virus mutates and finds ways to replicate that the inhibition strategy cant stop. There is a section in 'Almost like a Whale' that describes the number of genetic mutations that the virus has gone through in 30 years is in fact more than the human genome has 'ever' gone through.

The call anything they want AIDS these days. As a diesease it is FINISHED IN EUROPE look at the stats... http://www.avert.org/eurosum.htm This part is still unproven Chex and you of all people should know that. HIV infections has so many contradictions. Clinical trials show what? That Azt kills t-cells faster than aids??!! What is one of the definitions for aids and I challenge you not to laugh? pneumonia = pneumonia pmeumonia + hiv presence = aids Bollocks. If HIV is present and the pneumonia is picked up by a patient who you wouldnt normally expect to get it, then that is probably a clinical symptom associated with immune deficiency. Its the start of the syndrome tbh. Causality Parky, its the cornerstone of medical research.

Utter cobblers Parky. This duesberg bloke might be good with a microscope but he doesnt understand evidence based medicine. If clinical trials show survival benefits from drugs designed to stop the virus spreading then thats good enough for me to end the debate. AIDS is just a failure of the immune system brought on a by a retrovirus. Its not really a seperate thing, the mark of the disease is defined by observable clinical symptoms which in turn is associated with higher viral loads. As Renton said

No there isnt.

London or Amsterdam for me.

Does he play no. 9? If he does he looked good last night.

I watched that shambles tonight too and yet again Duff was utter cack. How lucky though? 94.40 on the clock when they got that winner. I've seen blind peole with a better eye for goal. That team had no plan it seemed, Staunton must've just told them to just show up and we'll win. Everything about the FAI stinks, from the top right down to the current manager. BBC called him a 'livewire' Not sure Staunton is up to the job, certainly no more clue how to get the best out of Duff than Roeder.

Take away pizza in a box The clue was in Wacky's post like.

Scousers laptop

I watched that shambles tonight too and yet again Duff was utter cack. How lucky though? 94.40 on the clock when they got that winner.

Schwarz und Weiss by the 1954 world cup winning side is a highlight of the first page. Released in 1973 too, the year i was born.

As a regular reader of Brooker i find him a readable but contrary twat. He is right about Games on PC's but only children play games. I find the 'define yourself through technology' line retarded since billions of drivers all over the world either do that or would love to do that every day. He talks shit for the most part. I recently went back to PC too.

Looking like a pumpkin? Yep and feeling like a plum too.