NJS

Just read that the person who compared Israel to Nazis at Corbyn's "conference" was an Auschwitz survivor whose parents died there.

There are displaced "tribes" who've been shit upon and usurped from their natural territories all around the world. I think the Jews think they have a special case due to their "divine right" definition. I have no problem in saying that makes their case less viable in my opinion but its their treatment of Palestinians even to this day that should make people more courageous in speaking out against them. I also think considering what happened to them, such an easy attitude to oppression is hard to take as well. Of course making that allusion isnt allowed either.

But without the Schar and Muto signings naysayer

I caught a brief bit of an interview with one of the editors of the Jewish newspapers who stated that criticism of the new law was antisemitic as far as he was concerned.

One of the guidelines is that it's antisemitic to call Israel a racist state. They just passed a law that states that Israel is a Jewish state for Jews which would have the south African apartheid regime nodding approvingly. If you point this out you break those guidelines. As I've said before some people's support and sympathy for Palestinians has gone too far but this is an attempt to ensure that the slightest criticism of Israel is a disciplinary matter in order to get at Corbyn. All the other governments and organisations that agree to those guidelines are ones that wouldn't dream of saying anything against Israel so its a no brainer for them.

The standards that stop any debate on Israel?

Isn't this just numbers? Four or five rebels aside, if they can't beat the number of tory MPs with all their MPs voting- especially when their so called rebels don't actually rebel - what can they actually do?

Probably part of the group that tweeted that the Palestinians who were massacred a couple of months ago asked for it then deleted it. THing is if they sign up to this standard definition, the second someone say's anything against Israel no matter how justified they're fucked. (In reply to CT's shit stirring)

Even tonight he said "it was Russia, could have been others as well though" i know we haven't got the right to talk when it comes to constitutions but they seem over proud of theirs with this "checks and balances" thing - he's appointed one, possibly two supreme court judges and with both houses being Republican, those checks and balances are pretty much void. Even if the senate went say 55-45 to the Democrats in November which is a huge stretch they'd still be short of the impeachment figure and there's no way the cunt would be as "honourable" as Nixon and resign even if Mueller has him cold.

No one would like to see them jailed more than me but it isn't going to happen and fining rich people the amounts they can is pointless too. Declaring the result void is a non-starter on the money question. I get the impression the commission isnt really valid in the 21st century.

I know the overspending thing is against the rules but I'm not that bothered by a couple of hundred grand. The Russian / Cambridge Analtyica stuff on the other had should be investigated to fuck.

I'm starting to think no deal might be better for a decent future - no flights, food shortages, factory shutdowns and gridlocked Kent might have the effect of waking people up from this imbecilic stupor.

Saw his helicopter convoy pass a little while ago - had a moment's fantasy of Ashley defying the no fly and a beautiful, fiery meeting taking place.

Loftus-Cheek did well when he came on - I couldn't see why he preferred Alli who was carrying an injury in the subsequent games.

They were very reliant on set pieces it has to be said. Nowt wrong with that as such but it underlines how there was a lack of traditional creativity in midfield.

His midfield game changer was Eric fucking Dier. Alli, Lingard and Kane could all easily have been replaced. Croatia played football so good luck to them.

There's one with a load of cunts on an ambulance car in London which I can't be arsed to find - have a look at the one with a fattish lass flashing her bra/tits - there's a lad next to a lad in a black t-shirt who has a look on his face like he's never seen a pair before. Summed it up for me.

Not pc I know but blokes who identify as women so they can use their cocks on reluctant lesbians does sound dodgy to me.

I agree with HF's tweet implying Kane was clever for the pen as well - he deliberately set off stumbling, inviting the player to fall on him. Bloke was daft and it was a foul but still iffy. Not surprised to see Neville encouraging "cleverness" either.

Didn't see the game this afternoon - were Sweden any good?

Funny how the government's understanding of the EU is just as much fucked up by 40 years of propaganda as the general moron in the street.

I thought Ronaldo flung an elbow but not full tilt. Interesting that that's a yellow though as I can't recall any similar downgrades. Unbelievable play acting all round again - they must start giving cards for it.

I know we're all supposed to have warned Germany to fail but I couldn't see past that cunt Larsson.

Doing the VAR sign is going to be the new John Terry imaginary card brandish.

There should definitely be more cards for cheating like.