themags 0 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio 0 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 VDS's fault tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gram 0 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Van Der Saar had a shocker. What the fuck he was doing when Rio knocked the ball back is anyones guess. He palmed the ball away like a schoolboy keeper too often and the first goal came from that. Never really rated VDS and todays performance was appalling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gejon 2 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Van Der Saar had a shocker. What the fuck he was doing when Rio knocked the ball back is anyones guess. He palmed the ball away like a schoolboy keeper too often and the first goal came from that. Never really rated VDS and todays performance was appalling. Hugely overrated since he moved there, didn't get half the praise when he was at Fulham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Totally Van Der Sarr's fault in my opinion. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1nicm_po...td-20-ferdinand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM4 0 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Well we can't know for sure... whether or not VdS called it or called for it to be left is the key here. Anyway concerning Rio, I thought he was more at fault for the first goal!! just got totally bullied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@yourservice 67 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 VdS looks like a lanky streak of screech on that pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capo 0 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Would be fair to say that he got rather Merked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Would be fair to say that he got rather Merked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 17026 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Fucking hate duck lip, always the quickest to the goalscorer etc and in the cameras face twat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatful Of Hollow 0 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Ferdinand's reaction would suggest there was no call from VDS like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Whether it was Ferdinands fault or not, his ott girly strop reaction was fuckin priceless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 ferdinand was far too casual - he didn't look up to see where the keeper was and just played it without looking - Mind I'm trying to get Mad Sir Alex's face at that moment as a screen saver........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 1 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Fucking hate duck lip, always the quickest to the goalscorer etc and in the cameras face twat! Big believer in his own hype, the wanker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinofbeans 87 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 exactly right luke. not in the same class as john terry for my money. overpaid thick as theives ponce tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 1 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 exactly right luke. not in the same class as john terry for my money. overpaid thick as theives ponce tbh. You could apply the same to Terry IMO, neither are fit to lace Woodgate's boots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 (edited) exactly right luke. not in the same class as john terry for my money. overpaid thick as theives ponce tbh. You could apply the same to Terry IMO, neither are fit to lace Woodgate's boots. Terry is absolutely top drawer and you know it, although Woody's been playing quality for Burra he's now susceptible to a turn of pace something which he never was while playing for us. Edited April 8, 2007 by Jonny2J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinofbeans 87 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 (edited) which begs the question, what would boro be like without him. and why did we not re sign him. i can testify what jonny says because i've had a similar thigh injury to woodgate and your initial accelleration is lessened greatly by this kind of thing. Edited April 9, 2007 by canofbeans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 we didn't sign him because a) he didn't want to come we already have a team of crocks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 exactly right luke. not in the same class as john terry for my money. overpaid thick as theives ponce tbh. You could apply the same to Terry IMO, neither are fit to lace Woodgate's boots. Yes, you could, but you'd be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 1 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 exactly right luke. not in the same class as john terry for my money. overpaid thick as theives ponce tbh. You could apply the same to Terry IMO, neither are fit to lace Woodgate's boots. Yes, you could, but you'd be wrong. He's overpaid and a big believer in his own hype, but he's still very good. Not as good as Woodgate though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now