Craig 6307 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Got a copy of the full list if anyone wants it,PM me. some very interesting ones. Any left wing model makers in Shields might be interested The one I found bizare was an this is 100% true, John Kennedy the ex Celtic player in on there, Carfin, Motherwell, and there's two more SPL players on as well. With all due respect Stevie you're hollering that it's a disgrace that the list was made public and you're guilty of naming names here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6307 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 It is fair to say that a lot of people confuse nationlism with racism mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 70 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 It is fair to say that a lot of people confuse nationlism with racism mind. Do they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6307 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 It is fair to say that a lot of people confuse nationlism with racism mind. Do they? Certain posts within this thread prove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 70 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 It is fair to say that a lot of people confuse nationlism with racism mind. Do they? Certain posts within this thread prove it. Ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8870 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 It is fair to say that a lot of people confuse nationlism with racism mind. Or patriotism with nationalism for that matter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 9 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 70 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 (edited) http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Good. That's prime McCarthyism though. (which is ironic as they have an interview with Gerald McCarthy. ) Edited November 19, 2008 by Fop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 70 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Good. That's prime McCarthyism though. We need more of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spongebob toonpants 3603 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 It is fair to say that a lot of people confuse nationlism with racism mind. Do they? Certain posts within this thread prove it. Jingoism iyam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6307 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Fucking idiocy IYAM And no, I'm not pro-BNP... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 70 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Fucking idiocy IYAM And no, I'm not pro-BNP... Explain why it's idiocy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6307 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Fucking idiocy IYAM And no, I'm not pro-BNP... Explain why it's idiocy? They're choosing to end his employment on the grounds of something that they have learned about him, not what he has actually done!! If he'd used his position as a platform to air his views and breach broadcasting code then I agree - he would have to go! Sacking him because of his political conurtations alone is prejudice of the highest order. I can understand the practicalities of why it's not suitable for party members to be employed by the police or in teaching but a radio DJ? Jesus - strong case for unfair dismissal tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Fucking idiocy IYAM And no, I'm not pro-BNP... Explain why it's idiocy? They're choosing to end his employment on the grounds of something that they have learned about him, not what he has actually done!! If he'd used his position as a platform to air his views and breach broadcasting code then I agree - he would have to go! Sacking him because of his political conurtations alone is prejudice of the highest order. I can understand the practicalities of why it's not suitable for party members to be employed by the police or in teaching but a radio DJ? Jesus - strong case for unfair dismissal tbh I absolutely can't see how it's legal, but then I don't see how it's legal in the police either - or at least without banning all political party members as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 70 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Fucking idiocy IYAM And no, I'm not pro-BNP... Explain why it's idiocy? They're choosing to end his employment on the grounds of something that they have learned about him, not what he has actually done!! If he'd used his position as a platform to air his views and breach broadcasting code then I agree - he would have to go! Sacking him because of his political conurtations alone is prejudice of the highest order. I can understand the practicalities of why it's not suitable for party members to be employed by the police or in teaching but a radio DJ? Jesus - strong case for unfair dismissal tbh The quote actually says they have no plans of using him in the near future. Not sure he's been sacked as such although mileage will be in sensationalising it. I think listeners from diverse racial backrounds would be uncomfortable if they knew the iffy leanings of a presenter. The likes of James Whale and whatnot are great for radio, but I think being a memener of a quasi-right wing group is crossing the line for a broadcaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a...revelation.html First major casualty by the looks of it. Fucking idiocy IYAM And no, I'm not pro-BNP... Explain why it's idiocy? They're choosing to end his employment on the grounds of something that they have learned about him, not what he has actually done!! If he'd used his position as a platform to air his views and breach broadcasting code then I agree - he would have to go! Sacking him because of his political conurtations alone is prejudice of the highest order. I can understand the practicalities of why it's not suitable for party members to be employed by the police or in teaching but a radio DJ? Jesus - strong case for unfair dismissal tbh The quote actually says they have no plans of using him in the near future. Not sure he's been sacked as such although mileage will be in sensationalising it. I think listeners from diverse racial backrounds would be uncomfortable if they knew the iffy leanings of a presenter. The likes of James Whale and whatnot are great for radio, but I think being a memener of a quasi-right wing group is crossing the line for a broadcaster. The thing is (and it's an irony perhaps lost on the BNP, but never the less it still can't be ignored) a society can't start discriminating just on the basis of like or dislike, or at least if they do then how can they say anything about the BNP? Basically the BNP should be deemed illegal if that is what is needed, but if there's no case for it to be deemed illegal, then it should be treated in exactly the same way as every other political party. Anything else is just lip-service to freedom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Im back from work so I can finally voice my views on some of the shit written on here. Does supporting the BNP, make you any less able to do your job? No. Does supporting the BNP make you racist? Does it bollox. If you are worried immigration, crime and positive descrimination, who else are you go to be a member of? I DO NOT SUPPORT THE BNP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Im back from work so I can finally voice my views on some of the shit written on here. Does supporting the BNP, make you any less able to do your job? No. Does supporting the BNP make you racist? Does it bollox. If you are worried immigration, crime and positive descrimination, who else are you go to be a member of? I DO NOT SUPPORT THE BNP. All of the above yes. **stands shoulder to shoulder with Danny B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusoda Kid 1 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Im back from work so I can finally voice my views on some of the shit written on here. Does supporting the BNP, make you any less able to do your job? No. Does supporting the BNP make you racist? Does it bollox. If you are worried immigration, crime and positive descrimination, who else are you go to be a member of? I DO NOT SUPPORT THE BNP. All of the above yes. **stands shoulder to shoulder with Danny B. Stands shoulder to waist with Stevie and DannyB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 time those fascist swine were outed - if they have nothing to hide why are they all so upset? They KNOW they're unpleasant violent sociopaths - to me they are in the same class as paedophiles yet you're happy to allow terrorists and all sorts of arseholes loose on the streets as you've said on many occasions - so long as they don't live next to you. You're happy with terrorists, so called "reformed" criminals who have "done their time", and unpleasant foreigners who have no intention of integrating into this culture, with little or no regard for life, to roam around the streets - are they not "unpleasant violent sociopaths". Its this anti British attitude shown by you and others which these fuckers are feeding from and the naive left wing wankers are telling us that we have to put up with it, or we are racists. What a load of shite. Stevie is right, under the current direction, this country will become a muslim country, there is no other possible ending. The only question is how long it will take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Whether you agree about their ideologies or not, everyone has the right to their own political opinion and what's more, they reserve the right not to disclose it if they wish. The fact that the membership has been disclosed in full to the public is a disgrace. The fact that addresses and telephone numbers have been included is absolutely astonishing and IMO, grounds for sueing. I don't subscribe to the views of the BNP, but this is wrong. It's an invasion of privacy and breach of human rights. Being posted on the internet, the source should be quickly traced and if the some of the people 'named' are police, I expect this to be indentified pretty damned quick. Incidentally I find it ironically hilarious that Griffin wants to use the human rights act to protect the identity of the members despite the fact he's vehementally against the legislation absolutely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 It's blatently clear members of the BNP feel stigmatised like, why is that? If it's just a normal political party, why object to the public knowing you belong to it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Gold already btw Says a lot that they feel the need to keep their membership quiet imo. Because they're probably embarrassed by it and because of society's reactions. Also highlights for me again you can't have anything approaching a reasonable debate on immigration etc. without people being branded racists left, right and centre. Not a lot of sympathy for those who've had their identities revealed at the same time though. 100% yes, but its only the rabid left wingers who call anybody racist that doesn't agree with their own "intelligent" opinion. Lots of them being barely out of college, and/or brainwashed by an ex hippy masquerading as a teacher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 I knew this thread would go mental, what with all the sandal wearers who frequent this place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now